1: Intro to French, US and EU Law Flashcards
french court systems
tribunals < judicial/ordinary courts < courts of appeal < Cass/CE
same for administrative courts
then the CC which is not supreme to the CE or Cass but just that it is specialised on specific cases of constitutional review
european court of HR
not the EU so it’s not the ECJ
judicial body of the council of europe
allowed individual applications if you exhaust all recourses in your country
US court systems
federal government so federal courts and state courts
for federal level
- district courts (in all 50 states) < 11 circuit courts/courts of appeal < supreme court
common law
e.g. UK
judge-made law through binding precedents
based on case by case legal system where judges make decisions based on precedent and cases that have already taken place
principle of stare decisis where you are bound by what has been decided
civil law
no judge-made law (made through parliament with statutes or with the executive through regulations)
not bound by precedent but doesn’t mean they don’t use it
- if they want to overturn a precedent, no need for strong reasons
binding precedents
2 kinds
horizontal stare decisis
- court is bound by its own precedent
vertical stare decisis
- lower court is bound by precedent set by higher courts
for both, mandatory for the court to follow precedent in a common law setting
- need compelling reasons like a change of circumstances in law or a change in constitution that means the precedent changed
persuasive precedent
precedent set by courts that are at the same level or lower than you in the hierarchy
not bound but it’s persuasive
superprecedent
something you cannot overturn
precedent so well-settled that it is illegal and impossible for the court to overturn it
- Marbury v. Madison
question of whether it’s a super precedent because calls for overruling stopped or because it has been reaffirmed by the court for over 50 years
types of decisions from the supreme court
majority opinion
dissenting opinion
concurring opinion
decisions from french courts
no separate concurring or dissenting opinion
only one opinion to feel like it is unanimous
decisions from the ECHR
longer opinions with the possibility of dissenting or concurring opinions