1. Democracy and Participation - 1.1. Representative democracy and direct democracy Flashcards

1
Q

DEMOCRACY

What are the features of a ‘liberal democracy’?

A
  • free and fair elections
  • belief in human rights and civic rights
    e. g. freedom of speech and expression
  • extended right to vote
  • greater transparency
  • representation
  • accountability
  • power dispersal
  • legitimacy
  • education
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DEMOCRACY

What, essentially, is a democracy?

A

rule by the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DEMOCRACY

What is a direct democracy?

A

a system where decisions are made directly by the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DEMOCRACY

What are the features of a direct democracy?

A
  • participation is continuous and perpetual
  • direct participation where citizens make the decisions/policies themselves
  • no formal distinction between people and the government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DEMOCRACY

What examples are there of direct democracy?

A

Switzerland
has incorporated elements of direct democracy into its political system

e. g. citizens vote directly on important issues at the annual Landesgemeinde
e. g. Swiss constitution requires a frequent use of referenda

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DEMOCRACY

What is a representative democracy?

A

where people elect representatives who take decisions on their behalf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DEMOCRACY

What are the features of a representative democracy?

A
  • participation is indirect and infrequent
  • professionals act on behalf of the public
  • regular, free, fair elections
  • universal suffrage
  • representatives are accountable
  • political parties representing differing policies
  • parliament in the heart of majority decision making
  • representatives use their own judgement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DEMOCRACY

What are 6 advantages of direct democracy?

A
  1. more democratic
  2. citizens views, will and preferences are not distorted by middleman
  3. enhances political participation
  4. enhances political education
  5. may increase levels of satisfaction and support for political system
  6. citizens can vote on a single issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of direct democracy:
View 1: How is it more democratic?

A

power remains in hands of people
policies are precise and true to view of people
communities have control over important affairs that directly affect their lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of direct democracy:
View 2: How are views NOT distorted?

A

GM crops example:
Switzerland - people voted for 2005 ban on use of GM corps
UK - gov decided for the people that Gm crops should be given go ahead despite popular opposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of direct democracy:
View 3: How does it enhance political participation?

A

people encouraged to participate in political because citizens are constantly expected to take important decisions and govern the country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of direct democracy:
View 4: How does it enhance political education?

A

citizens are less likely to be ignorant/apathetic since they are regularly consulted on issues that affect them

having to participate in decision making encourages citizens to learn more about political issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of direct democracy:
View 5: How does it increase levels of satisfaction and support?

A

when people have a say they are more likely to support the system
they feel influential
increases legitimacy and stability
e.g. the UK is currently in a time of extreme distrust of political (since expenses scandal of 2009 and Brexit), DD would remove this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DEMOCRACY

What are 5 weaknesses of direct democracy?

A
  1. impractial/utopian
  2. most citizens lack sufficient political and technical knowledge to govern wisely
  3. may produce ‘tyranny of the majority’
  4. constant participation may over-strain public desire for participation
  5. in the UK, DD may undermine parliamentary sovereignty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DEMOCRACY
Weaknesses of direct democracy
View 1: How is it impractical/utopian?

A

impractical in bigger communities
mass societies of millions with sustained involvement in decision making is almost impossible
decisions would be very slow to react to situations that need swift action

e.g. referendums are time-consuming
e.g. DD may have worked in 40,000 citizens in ancient Athens
it is unlikely to work in modern Britain with almost 45 million citizens eligible to vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DEMOCRACY
Weaknesses of direct democracy
View 2: How do citizens lack sufficient political and technical knowledge?

A

they insufficiently informed to vote on issues
this limits ability to take informed vote on issues
govern in their own interest
e.g. can UK public provide an informed decision on the economic benefits of the Euro?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

DEMOCRACY
Weaknesses of direct democracy
View 3: How may it produce ‘tyranny of the majority’? What is the CA to this?

A

TotM - where minorities are placed at a disadvantage with either discrimination or possible restriction on their freedom
insufficiently responsible ot protect minorities

California, 2008:
heterosexual majority decided to outlaw gay marriage

Switzerland, 2009:
Roman Catholic majority banned construction of new minarets

CA - some insist that people can actually be trusted to care about minority rights
Maine, Maryland, Washington, 2012:
approved same-sex marriages
Ireland, 2015: legalised same-sex marriages through referendum
Ireland, 2018: legalised abortion through referendum

HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT INEVITABLE SO TOTM IS STILL A LARGE POSSIBILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

DEMOCRACY
Weaknesses of direct democracy
View 4: How may constant participation over-strain the public’s desire for political participation?

A

places heavy burden on ordinary citizens
could lead to apathy and ‘voter fatigue’ instead of greater interest
people do have the time

Switzerland: low turnouts in referendums and elections
UK: low turnouts in 2012 mayoral referendums

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

DEMOCRACY
Weaknesses of direct democracy
View 5: How might DD undermine UK parliamentary sovereignty?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

DEMOCRACY

What are 6 advantages of representative democracy?

A
  1. more practical
  2. representatives have better knowledge, education and experience
  3. politicians may be more rational than the emotional majority
  4. representatives can provide protection of minority groups
  5. relieves public burden
  6. still ensures some level of participation
  7. ensures high level of public accountability
  8. pragmatic and can accommodation elements of DD within it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 1: How is it practical?

A

works in mass societies
because political participation in infrequent
decisions can be taken swiftly

USA:
has a eligible population of 220 million citizens who can vote
yet the democratic process is manageable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 2: How do representatives have better knowledge, education and experience?

A

government is of experts and specialists
government posts are filled with people who possess detailed knowledge int eh areas o law, finance, medicine and economics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 3: How may politicians be more rational than the emotional majority? What is the CA to this?

A

they are less likely to be swayed by the media
they may make anti-humanitarian decisions or undermine civil liberties
Majority of population supported the death penalty, complete halt to immigration and restriction gay rights

CA - MPs voted in 1960s to legalise abortions, same-sex relations and abolish death penalty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 4: How many representatives provide better protection of minorities?

A

they may weigh up demands of minorities against the majority
they may prevent ToTM

UK, 2014:
the UK parliament legislated in 2014 to allow same-sex marriage

Slovenia, 2015:
Parliament passed marriage equality
however when the matter went to referendum, the Slovenian people vote to reject same-sex marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 5: How does it relieve the burden on the public?

A

the representatives have to deal with the day-to-day decision making
they are professional and have more time to deal with it
they can devote much of their time to learn about policies, problems and alternatives

Switzerland:
frequent referenda have caused fatigue across some of the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 6: How does it ensure some level of participation?

A
regular elections
referendums
pressure groups and protests
all take part in framework of RD
it enables significant levels of participation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 7: How does it enable high levels of public accountability?

A

they can hold representatives to account who fail to represent the will of the people properly
this is through elections and free speech

Labour premiership, 2010:
UK public held Labour to account
it was replaced as electorate was dissatisfied

Lib Dem, 2015:
made to pay for having let some of their voters down

28
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 8: How is it pragmatic?

A

it can include some forms/elements of DD within it

UK:
adapted to use of referendums
could easily adapt to use of initiatives and power of recall of representatives

29
Q

DEMOCRACY

What are 6 weaknesses of representative democracy?

A
  1. levels of participation are low
  2. power is taken away from citizens
  3. can rarely vote on single issues
  4. party discipline compromises will of the people
  5. does not necessarily guarantee against authoritarianism
  6. representatives rarely reflect the social make up of the population
30
Q

DEMOCRACY
Weaknesses of representative democracy
View 1: How are levels of participation low?

A

citizens are encouraged to vote once every 4-5 years only
even if turnouts are high (they are not) such participation is not as frequent and as meaningful as one finds in DD
this calls into question the legitimacy of the system

31
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 2: How is power transferred/taken away from citizens?

A

citizens relinquish their power shortly after the election become dis-empowered
they do not make decisions
this could frustrate or anger citizens
could lead to apathy or growing appeal of radical/populist parties

UK:
the UK public seemed opposed to the Iraq war (2003), the Lisbon Treaty (2009) and dramatic increase in university tuition fees (2010)

32
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 3: How does it mean citizens can rarely vote on single issues?

A

they vote for a package of many policies

UK:
people may want a say on direct issues such as immigration, taxation, austerity and privatisation and international affairs
however, in UK’s representative democracy, all they can do is vote for a party and accept its entire manifesto

33
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 4: How does party discipline compromise the will of the people?

A

MPs are committed to their party’s leadership rather than teh people who put them in power
they must toe the party-line
it is party eladership that controls their promotion, demotion or re-election

Lib Dem:
many MPs voted for a substantial increase of university tuition fees because their party, not their voters, expected them to do so

Labour:
many Labour MPs voted for the Iraq war against the will of the constituents due to party discipline

Conservative:
many have been forced to vote for austerity measures despite own personal preferences

34
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 5: How does RD not necessarily guarantee against authoritarianism?

A

it does not guarantee the protection of civil liberties
elected representatives may support an undemocratic leader or regime

UK, 2007:
the majority of MPs voted to extend detention without charge to 42 days

35
Q

DEMOCRACY
Advantages of representative democracy
View 6: How do representatives rarely reflect the social makeup of the population?

A
representatives rarely reflect the societal makeup of gender, class, ethnic and age composition
they tend to be white, middle-class and middle-age men

UK:
most MPs and cabinet members in UK parliament are white, middle class, middle aged, highly educated men

36
Q

DEMOCRACY

Is DD or RD more advantageous?

A

Representative democracy is mroe advantageous

this is because, while DD provides a more precise version of democracy with increased participation, it is utopian and cannot be applied to any modern day country.
Representative democracy provides the vest system for a large population who do not have time for constant participation.

37
Q

REFERENDUMS

What was the first national referendum in recent history? What was the outcome? What was the turnout?

A

1975 - Should UK remain a member of the European Community?
67% YES
33% NO

64.5% turnout

38
Q

REFERENDUMS

What are the 2 other national referendums, with outcome and turnout?

A
  1. 2011 - Should the UK adopt the alternative vote system for general elections?
    32% YES
    68% NO
    42% turnout
  2. 2016 - Should the EU remain a member of the EU?
    45% YES
    55% NO
    84% turnout
39
Q

REFERENDUMS

What were the 2 Scottish referendums, with outcome and turnout?

A
  1. 1997 - Should additional powers be devolved to Scotland and a Scottish Parliament established?
    72% YES
    26% NO
    60% turnout
  2. 2014 - Should Scotland become a completely independent country?
    45% YES
    55% NO
    85% turnout
40
Q

REFERENDUMS

What was the Ireland referendum?

A

1998 - Should the Belfast Agreement be implemented?
71% YES
29% NO
81% turnout

41
Q

REFERENDUMS

What was the Wales referendum?

A

1997 - Should additional powers be devolved to Wales and a Welsh assembly established?
50.3% YES
49.7% NO
50% turnout

42
Q

REFERENDUMS

What was the Edinburgh referendum?

A

2005 - Should a ‘congestion change’ zone be introduced in Edinburgh?
25% YES
75% NO
62% turnout

43
Q

REFERENDUMS

What was the north-east England referendum?

A

2004 - Should additional powers be devolved to northeast England and a regional assembly established?
22% YES
78% NO
48% turnout

44
Q

REFERENDUMS

What are the features of referendums?

A
  1. popular vote where citizens are asked to determine an issue of policy
  2. device or form of direct democracy
  3. can be on 1 question or more (e.g. Scottish devolution referendum)
  4. held at discretion of the governments and Parliament
  5. answer is always either ‘Yes’ or ‘No’
  6. in UK they are advisory due to Parliamentary Sovereignty
45
Q

REFERENDUMS

What are 6 reasons referendums may be called?

A
  1. to resolve issues of major constitutional reforms
  2. to resolve major political disputes or political deadlocks
  3. to weaken to opposition by demonstrating that their policies are not supported
  4. governments call referendums when they are confident of winning
  5. to overcome internal disputes within party/government
  6. in undemocratic regimes, the government may use referendums to legitimise their power
46
Q

REFERENDUMS

Examples of referendums being used to resolve ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL IMPORTANCE

A
  • devolution in Wales and Scotland
  • 1998, London: new Mayor and Assembly
  • 2016 EU membership
47
Q

REFERENDUMS

Examples of referendums being used to RESOLVE MAJOR POLITICAL DISPUTES

A
  • 1975: should UK remain in EEC?
  • Ireland, 2015: same-sex marriage
  • Ireland, 2018: legalise abortion
48
Q

REFERENDUMS

Examples of referendums being used to WEAKEN OPPOSITION

A
  • devolution in Scotland and Wales

this was opposed by Conservatives, but they were silenced following the resounding ‘Yes’ vote in Scotland

49
Q

REFERENDUMS

Examples of referendums being used by GOVERNMENTS WHEN THEY ARE CONFIDENT OF WINNING

A
  • Scottish devolution

Labour was certain the people will support this idea

50
Q

REFERENDUMS

Examples of referendums being used to OVERCOME INTERNAL DISPUTES

A
  • 1975 EEC membership
    Labour party was divided over the question of Europe
  • 2011 voting system
    supported by Lib Dem and opposed by Conservatives
51
Q

REFERENDUMS

Examples of referendums being used by UNDEMOCRATIC REGIMES TO LEGITIMISE THEIR POWER

A

Egypt

Chile under General Pinochet

52
Q

REFERENDUMS

What are 5 arguments FOR referendums?

A
  1. more democratic
    • direct democracy
    • increase participation
    • check the power of the government
    • legitimacy
  2. resolve big constitutional and moral issues
  3. educate the public
  4. vote on a particular issue
  5. prevent governments from making unpopular decisions
53
Q

REFERENDUMS
Arguments FOR referendum
View 1: How is it more democratic?

A
  • direct democracy
  • increase participation
    Scottish referendum may have left a long term legacy of participation as 2015 general elections were 71% (average was 66%)
  • check the power of the government
    government controls Parliament through elective dictatorship
    referendums can ensure a government does not act unaccountably
    Ireland, 2013: people defied the government and voted to keep the 2nd chamber (Senate)
  • legitimacy in face of a problematic voting system
    FPTP means a government can be elected on a minority vote - doubting its legitimacy and mandate
    referendums can change this at a local and national level
  • can essentially entrench a policy
54
Q

REFERENDUMS
Arguments FOR referendum
View 2: How can they resolve big constitutional and moral issues?

A

some issues are so important, they require popular support/consent
can unite and heal party divisions

55
Q

REFERENDUMS
Arguments FOR referendum
View 3: How can they have an educative effect? What is the CA to this?

A
  • force gov to explain their proposals to electorate
  • stimulate debate and, therefore, better informed public

2011, AV referendum: enhanced public understanding of different voting systems as did EU 2016

Several campaign groups set to influence opinion with evidence in Brexit:
Britain Stronger in Europe
Vote Leave
Lexit (Left Leave)

CA - Electoral Reform Society reported the EU referendum was characterised by poorly informed debate
e.g. both sides were negative and made false claims

Similarly, NO2AV exaggerated costs of AC and wrongly argued it benefits extreme parties

56
Q

REFERENDUMS
Arguments FOR referendum
View 4: How can they help to vote on a particular isseu?

A

due the features of a referendum (yes or no answer on one question usually)
in elections, the public has no opportunity to express a view on a specific issue.policy
they vote for a manifesto
e.g. none of the main parties ever pledged in its manifesto a Brexit commitment
only a referendum on the matter enabled the public to vote on this issue

57
Q

REFERENDUMS
Arguments FOR referendum
View 5: How do they stop governments from making unpopular decisions?

A

they understand the public consensus by the result and usually adjust their policies accordingly
2004, North-East England: prevented the government to continue with regional devolution programmes

58
Q

REFERENDUMS

What are 5 arguments against referendums?

A
  1. public is poorly qualified
  2. referendums are done to suit political parties, not the public (illusion of choice)
  3. may lead to tyranny of the majority
  4. undermine parliamentary sovereignty
  5. time consuming and costly
  6. may overburden the public (voter’s fatigue/apathy)
  7. there’s a danger that people will use the referendum to express their dissatisfaction with the gov
59
Q

REFERENDUMS
Argument AGAINST referendums
View 1 - How is the public poorly qualified? Example?

A
  • surrender power of experts to the masses
  • media and short term considerations may influence the public’s decisions
  • cannot be trusted to vote on important policy decisions
  • some issues may be too complex
    e. g. Brexit
60
Q

REFERENDUMS
Argument AGAINST referendums
View 2 - How are referendums done to suit political parties rather than the public? Example?

A
  • called at discretion of government
  • only calls them when they think they will increase their legitimacy
  • allow gov to gain greater control over policy decision making
  • gov can repeat the referendum until they get the answer they want
    e. g. Ireland voted on the Lisbon treaty 2 times (2003 and 2009)

e.g. AV referendum
Brexit to stop people voting for UKIP

61
Q

REFERENDUMS
Argument AGAINST referendums
View 3 - How may referendums lead to tyranny of the majority? Example? What is the CA to this?

A
  • referendums are decided by the majority answer
  • the minority loses and is not taken into account

e. g. Scots believe Brexit vote imposed English views on Scots who were majority remain. They got ‘dragged out’
e. g. young people were also forced to accept it

CA - parliamentarians are liekly to be more concerned with the rights of minorities
e.g. legalising gay sex, abortions 1960s
same sex marriage in 2013

62
Q

REFERENDUMS
Argument AGAINST referendums
View 4 - How do referendums undermine parliamentary sovereignty?

A
  • since representatives given consent at elections, they have a mandate and no need for a referendum
  • referendums may lead to a loss of respect for elected representatives
  • excessive use of referendums undermines principle of parl.
63
Q

REFERENDUMS
Argument AGAINST referendums
View 5 - How are referendums time consuming and costly?

A

AV referendum cost nearly £75 million in times of economic recession
Scottish referendum was £13.3 million
Brexit cost £140 million

64
Q

REFERENDUMS
Argument AGAINST referendums
View 6 - How can referendums overburden the public?

A
  • voters show little desire to participate in referendums
    e.g. AV referendum was 41% turnout
  • ## in turn, low turnout may mean the referendums lack credibility
65
Q

REFERENDUMS
Argument AGAINST referendums
View 7 - How can referendums be used to express dissatisfaction with government?

A
  • may ignore issue in question altogether
  • referendums may have become ‘mini elections’ on performance of the current gov

e.g. North-East England 2004 referendum decisive ‘no’ vote was though to been determined by resentment of the Labour gov