1. Corporate Finance Flashcards

1
Q

Modigliani Miler Proposition #1

A

No Tax: Capital Structure does not affect the Value of the Firm (Vlev = V unlev)

Tax: 100% Debt is NICE (Vlev = Vunlev + tD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Modigliani Miller Assumption

A
  • Homogeneous Expectations
  • Perfect Capital Markets (no tax, no bankruptcy)
  • Risk Free Rate
  • No Agency Costs (monitoring, bonding)
  • Independent Decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Modigliani Miller Proposition #2

A

No Tax: Higher Leverage increases Ke and offsets any debt effect. WACC not affected.
- Equation: Re = Ro + [(Ro - Rd) * D/E] and WACC is constant

W/ Tax: WACC is minimized @ 100% debt, even though more leverage increases Ke
Equation: Re = Ro + [(Ro - Rd) * D/E] * (1-t)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Modigliani Miller w/ Taxes

A

Equation: V(lev) = Vunlev + tD - FD

Equation 2: Re = Ro + [(Ro - Rd)*(1-t)] * D/E

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Agency Costs

A
  • Managers v. Shareholders
    1) Monitoring (Auditor, BoD, Watching)
    2) Bonding (Non-compete, Insurances Performance)
  • Residual Losses (Since 1 & 2 are not perfect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Static Trade-Off Theory

A

From a certain point, adding debt will increase WACC, despite the tax shield provided by debt

Equation: V(lev) = Vunlev + tD - FD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Common Law

A
  • Less Debt, More Equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Civil Law

A
  • More Debt, Less Equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consequences (Inflation, GDP)

A
  • High inflation and low GDP worsen long-term investments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dividend Types

A

1) Regular (may include DRP)
2) Extra / Special
3) Liquidating
3) Stock Dividend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DRP (Div Type)

A
  • Div Cash -> Reinvestment
  • Do NOT dilute EPS (if bought @ market price)
  • Issuance
  • Pros: empowerment of minorities, cheaper (no flotation), no transaction costs for participants
  • Cons: more work record keeping, cash is STILL taxed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dividend Impact in Balance Sheet

A
  • Lower Cash

- Higher Leverage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stock Split (Impacts)

A
  • More qtd of shares

- Lower EPS and Dividend per Share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Equation V(unlev)

A

Equation: V(unlev) = EBT (1-t) / WACC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Calculate Re (cost of equity) after buyback

A

Re = Ro + [(Ro-Rd)*(1-t)] * Debt / Equity after Buyabck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stock Dividend (Div Type)

A
  • NO chg in value
  • NO chg in % ownership
  • NO chg in leverage because mkt value of equity does not change
  • Cost PER share will be lower (but TOTAL cost remains flat)
  • MORE liquidity
  • LESS volatility
  • ↓ Price
  • ↓ Retained Earnings
  • ↑ Contributed Capital
  • ↓ EPS = ↑ Qt of Shares
  • PRICE drops by [D*(1-td)]/(1-tcg)]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Stock Split (Div Type)

A
  • Similar to stock dividend (non-cash)

- Does not affect P/E (double qtd of shares, so half of price, but also half of EPS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Dividend Irrelevance

A
  • If no tax, no transaction costs, no agency costs, no info assymetry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Bird in Hand Theory

A
  • Investors prefer money in hand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Tax Aversion in Dividends (Implications)

A
  • If Tcapgains < Tdiv, prefer capgains
  • If Tcapgains > Tdiv, prefers CASH
  • If Tcapgains = Tdiv, prefers CASH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Dividend Signs

A
  • Dividend Initiation: ambiguous
  • Unexpected Dividend Increase: revenues are strong
  • Dividend Decrease: revenues are bad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Agency Costs

A
  • Shareholders v. Mgrs: over or underinvestments due to preferences over less/more payout
  • Shareholder v. Bondholder: Fight for CASH (payout, interest payment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Factors affecting dividend policy

A
  • Investment Opportunities
  • Volatility of future earnings
  • Financial flexibility (need for cash)
  • Tax considerations
  • Flotation costs
  • Legal (covenants etc)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Tax Systems (Types)

A
  • Double Taxation (@ corporate + @ individual)
  • Split Rate (different rates for retained or distributed). Divs still taxed twice, but @ lower levels in comparison to Double
  • Imputation (pay @ corporate, but due @ individual)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Stable Dividend
- Changes are only allowed when SUSTAINED earnings increased
26
Target Payout Adjustment Model
Δ Increase = [(Lucro t1*Payout Novo) - Atual Div] * (1 / n)
27
Share Repurchase Methods
- Open mkt (vai a mercado e já era) - Fixed price tender offer (Banco Inter) - Dutch Auction (selects range, bids until all order is cleared @ higher price for all) - Direct negotiation
28
Wealth for Shareholders from Cash Dividend (Formula)
Equation: (mkt value - cash)/#shares + div/#shares
29
EPS effect from repurchase
EPS dps = NI antes - cash / #qtd menor shares
30
Repurchase / Buyback Effects
Internal Funds = ↑ EPS (NI/#menos shares) External Funds = ↑ EPS if Kd after-tax < E/P Effect BVPS: If Precompra > Pbefore = ↓ BVPS If Precompra < Pbefore = ↑ BVPS
31
Dividend Trends Nowadays
- Adapt to investor preferences - ↓ Cash dividends - ↑ Repurchases (US, Europe)
32
DPR (Payout)
DPR = Div / NI
33
Coverage (DCR)
DCR = NI / Div
34
FCFE Coverage
FCFE Coverage = FCFE / (Div + Repurchase)
35
Dividend Yield
Div Yield = Div / Price
36
Governance: disperse ownership v. disperse voting
- Weak shareholders | - Strong managers
37
Governance: concentrated owner v. concentrated voting
- Strong shareholders | - Weak managers
38
Governance: disperse owner v. concentrated voting
- Weak minorotários
39
Governance: concentrated owner v. disperse voting
- Results from shareholders w/ restrictions
40
Stewardship Codes
Voluntary Codes
41
ESG approach to fixed income v. equity
Fixed Income: worries on the downside risks | Equity: worries on upside/downside risks
42
M&A integration types
- Statutory = (Assets + Liabilities) = Spoonrocket - Subsidiary = Gilette and P&G - Consolidation = ITUB4
43
M&A merger types
- Horizontal (similar businesses) - Vertical (same supply chain, backward supplier or forward distributor) - Conglomerate (diversification)
44
Bootstrap Earnings
- High P/E firm issues shares with low book value but high prices to acquire real book value shares w/ lower prices - ↑ EPS, but should converge to weighted average - Diff stages, diff business (similar sectors trade @ similar stock prices and multiples)
45
M&A buying stocks (advantages)
- Shareholders receive - You can bypass mgmt and directly buy shares - Shareholders pay taxes on the deal liquidation
46
M&A buying assets (advantages)
- If >50% it will need shareholders - If <50% it just needs management - Target pays taxes on the income received
47
Pre-Deal Defense
- Poison pill (flip IN buying target or flip over buying acquirer) - Poison put (cláusula de vencto antecipado) - Restricted vvoting - Supermajority rules - Staggered board - Golden parachutes
48
Post-Deal Defense
- Say no - Litigation - Greenmail (calaboca $) - Repurchase of shares - Recapitalize w/ debt - Crown Jewel (may be subject to litigation) - Pacman (offer to buy acquirer) - Knight (bid war via friend) - Squire (minority stake purchase via friend)
49
Bear Hug
- Go directly to the BoD | - If they refuse,
50
M&A Valuation - DCF (Pros and Cons)
Pros: easy to customize Cons: DCFs may be negative, usual errors, chg of WACC across time brings inconsistency
51
M&A Valuation - Multiples (Pros and Cons)
Pros: data access is easy, similar assets Cons: gives fair price stock but not a fair takeover price - hard to incorporate in the analysis - timing and demand
52
Takeover Premium (Formula)
TP = (DP - SP) / SP
53
Acquirers Gains (Formula)
Gacquires = S - (Pdeal - Pantes)
54
Target Gains (Formula)
Gtarget = (Pdeal - Pantes)
55
Value A+T (Formula)
Vat = Va + Vt + S - Cash
56
Conditions to create value in a M&A
- Strong buyer, low premiums, few bids, good market reaction
57
Target Possibilities
- Carve-out (create new tax ID + IPO in the future) - Spin-off (Getnet) - Split-off (Shareholders may exchange shares in the parent for shares in the Newco) - Liquidation
58
Cashflow Estimations
- Initial Layout = FCInv + NWC Inv - Op. Inflow = [(S - C - D)*(1-t)] + D - TNOCF = Sal(t) + NWC Inv - [t* (lucro na venda)]
59
MACRS 10y (scheme)
Depreciate 10% in Y0,5 | Depreciate higher in volume between (linear, 20%)
60
How to evaluate mutually exclusive projects
- Calculate NPV for MMC | - Find each project NPV and use as PV, find EAA (PMT)
61
Real Options (Types)
- Timing - Sizing - Flexibility (price-setting or production-flexibility) - Fundamental (PETRO)
62
Scenarios
- Scenario (base, best, worst case) - Sensitivity (chg one input) - Monte Carlo (distribution of NPV outcomes)