1. Conspiracy Flashcards

1
Q

What are the elements of conspiracy - s310(1)?

A
  • Conspires
  • With any person
  • To commit an offence or
  • to do or omit, in any part of the world,
  • Anything of which the doing or omission in New Zealand would be an offence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a conspiracy?

A

It is two or more people forming an agreement to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means.
(where there is only the intention to commit the offence without an agreement, then no offence is committed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the case law regarding a conspiracy intention vs agreement?

A

a conspiracy consists not merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. So long as such a design rests in intention only it is not indictable. When two agree to carry it into effect, the very plot is an act in itself.
- Mulcahy v R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is held regarding someone withdrawing from a conspiracy?

A

a person withdrawing from the agreement is still guilty of conspiracy as are those people who become party to the agreement after it has been made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When is the offence of conspiracy complete?

A

the offence is complete on the agreement being made with the required intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the case law regarding the ending of a conspiracy?

A

a conspiracy does not end with the making of the agreement. The conspiratorial agreement continues in operation and therefore in existence until it is ended by completion of its performance or abandonment or in any other manner by which agreements are discharged.
- R v Sanders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the actus rea of a conspiracy?

A

it is the actual agreement by two or more people to carry out the illegal conduct.
(Mere passive presence or knowledge of an intention does not amount to being a party to the conspiracy).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the mens rea for a conspiracy?

A

the offenders mental intent must be to commit the full offence. Where this intent does not exist no crime has been committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How are the parties in a conspiracy proven?

A

this is proven circumstantially. A person cannot conspire alone, there must be another conspirator for an offence to be committed. This may include a person who is unable to carry out the substantive offence themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the case law regarding suspects for a conspiracy?

A

Where you can prove that a suspect conspired with other parties (one or more people) whose identities are unknown, that suspect can still be convicted even if the identity of the other parties is never established and remains unknown.
- R v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an offence?

A

any act or omission that is punishable on conviction under any enactment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is held regarding conspiring with a spouse or partner?

A

A person is capable of conspiring with their spouse, civil union partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is held regarding jurisdiction?

A

a person charged with conspiracy need not have been in NZ at the time of the act, omission or event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is a defence to conspiracy?

A

if it can be proved that the act or omission was not an offence under the law of the place where it was intended to be carried out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is held regarding admissibility of evidence for conspiracy?

A

anything a conspirator or party to a joint charge says or does to further the common purpose is admissible against the others involved, this being an exception to the hearsay rule and as such conspirators should be jointly charged.
(this does not include explanations made after the common purpose is carried out. Then, the explanation is evidence only against the person making it).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are there specific provisions for conspiracy to commit certain offences?

A
  • treason
  • piracy
  • making false accusations
  • defeating justice
  • murder
17
Q

what info should be obtained from witnesses?

A
  • Identity of people present at time of agreement
  • With whom the agreement was made
  • What offence was planned
  • Any acts carried out to further the common purpose
18
Q

what info should be sought from suspects?

A
  • Existence of an agreement to commit an offence or omit to do something that would be an offence
  • Intent of those involved in the agreement
  • Identity of those involved
  • Whether anything was written, said or done to further the common purpose
19
Q

What should be considered for laying of charges for conspiracy?

A

where the substantive charge can be proved you should avoid laying a conspiracy charge, unless the substantive charge fails to adequately represent the total criminality of the offending encountered.

20
Q

What is the punishment for conspiracy?

A
  • 7 years if the max punishment for that offence exceeds 7 years imprisonment
  • otherwise the same punishment as if he had committed that offence.
21
Q

Laying both a substantive charge and a related conspiracy charge is often desirable because?

A
  • the evidence admissable only on the conspiracy charge may be prejudicial to the other charges
  • the judge may disallow the evidence as it will be too prejudicial
  • the addition of a conspiracy charge may unnecessarily complicate and prolong a trial
  • where the charge of conspiracy is not founded on evidence or is an abuse of process, it may be quashed
  • severance may be ordered