1. Audit Reports Flashcards
When assessing management’s plans for dealing with the adverse effects of future conditions and events, mitigating factors would include:
- The postponement of expenditures (including Research & Development)
- Plans to dispose of assets,
- Plans to borrow money or restructure debt,
- Plans to increase ownership equity (sell stock).
The auditor’s considerations relating to management’s plans for dealing with the adverse effects of these conditions most likely would include management’s plans to:
Typically, plans to increase ownership equity, to borrow money, to restructure debt, to sell assets, and/or to reduce or delay expenditures might all be considered mitigating factors.
What is a Disclaimer of Opinion?
A disclaimer of opinion means that the auditor was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a reasonable basis for an opinion, thus, no opinion is expressed.
GAAS (insufficient audit evidence)= Very Material Issue
GAAS
What is Emphasis-of-Matter?
- Emphasis-of-Matter and Other Matter Paragraphs
In certain circumstances, the auditor may determine that it is necessary to add additional communications to the auditor’s report WITHOUT MODIFYING THE AUDITOR’S OPINION.
U.S. auditing standards do not require an emphasis-of-matter paragraph when an uncertainty is
properly disclosed.
What is a Qualified Opinion?
A qualified opinion states that except for the effects of the matter(s) to which the qualification relates, the financial statements present fairly, In all material respects, the financial postilion, results of operations, and cash flows of the entity in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework.
GAAP or GAAS = Material Issue
What is an Adverse Opinion?
An adverse opinion states that the financial statements do not present fairly the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the entity In conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework.
GAAP (Materially Misstated)= Very Material Issue
What is a scope limitation?
Occurs when the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement.
An auditor may reasonably issue an "except for" qualified opinion for a(an): Scope limitation Unjustified accounting change a. No No b. Yes Yes c. No Yes d. Yes No
Choice “b” is correct. Yes - Yes.
An “except for” qualified opinion is expressed when the “exceptions to GAAP” or scope restrictions are material but not pervasive.
Choices “d”, “c”, and “a” are incorrect, based on the rule above.
Pell, CPA, decides to serve as group engagement partner in the audit of the financial statements of Tech Consolidated, Inc. Smith, CPA, auditsone of Tech’s subsidiaries. In which situation(s) should Pell make reference to Smith’s audit under U.S. GAAS?
I. Pell reviews Smith’s audit documentation and assumes
responsibility for Smith’s work, but expresses a qualified opinion on Tech’s financial statements.
II. Pell is unable to review Smith’s audit documentation; however, Pell’s inquiries indicate that Smith has an excellent reputation for professional competence and integrity.
II only. Under U.S. GAAS, the group engagement partner
makes reference in the audit report to the work of the component auditor when the group engagement partner is unable to review the component auditor’s audit documentation. This is because the group engagement partner will be unable to be satisfied concerning the work performed by the component auditor. Even though the component auditor has an excellent reputation, the group engagement partner must see the work to be able to assume responsibility for it. Note that under ISAs, no reference is made to the component auditor unless required by law or regulation.
Choice “b” is incorrect. When the group engagement partner decides to assume responsibility for the work of the component auditor, no reference is made to the work of the component auditor.
In the first audit of a new client, an auditor was able to extend auditing procedures to gather sufficient evidence about consistency. Under these circumstances, the auditor should:
a. State that the consistency standard does not apply.
b. Not refer to consistency in the auditor’s report.
c. Not report on the client’s income statement.
d. State that the accounting principles have been applied consistently.
Choice “b” is correct. The auditor’s standard report implies that the auditor is satisfied that the comparability of financial statements between periods has not been materially affected by changes in accounting principles and that such principles have been consistently applied between or among periods. Since the auditor has gathered sufficient evidence about consistency, no reference need be made in the report.
Types of Opinions:
The auditor wishes to emphasize an unusually important subsequent event.
Emphasis of a matter is disclosed in an additional paragraph added to an otherwise unmodified opinion.
Types of Opinions:
Quarterly financial data required by the SEC has been omitted.
Omission of selected quarterly data required by SEC regulations is disclosed in an emphasis-of-matter paragraph added to an otherwise unmodified opinion.
Reference in a group engagement partner’s report to the fact that part of the audit was performed by another auditor most likely would be an indication of the:
a. Different opinions the auditors are expressing on the components of the financial statements that each audited.
b. Group engagement partner’s recognition of the component auditor’s competence, reputation, and professional certification.
c. Lack of materiality of the portion of the financial statements audited by the other auditor.
d. Divided responsibility between the auditors who conducted the audits of the components of the overall financial statements.
Choice “d” is correct. Reference to a component auditor indicates division of responsibility for the audits of the components of the overall financial statements.
When there has been a change in accounting principles, but the effect of the change on the comparability of the financial
statements is not material, the auditor should:
a. Explicitly concur that the change is preferred.
b. Refer to the change in an explanatory paragraph.
c. Not refer to consistency in the auditor’s report.
d. Refer to the change in the opinion paragraph
Choice “c” is correct. If an accounting change has no material effect on the comparability of the financial statements, the auditor does not need to recognize the change in the current year’s audit report.
Which paragraphs of an auditor’s report on financial statements under U.S. auditing standards should refer to generally
accepted auditing standards (GAAS) and generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)?
GAAS GAAP
a. Auditor’s
Responsibility Introductory
b. Auditor’s
Responsibility Opinion
c. Introductory Auditor’s
Responsibility
d. Introductory Introductory
Choice “b” is correct. Under U.S. auditing standards, the auditor states that the audit was conducted in accordance with GAAS in the Auditor’s Responsibility paragraph. The auditor expresses an opinion on the financial statements’ conformity with GAAP in the Opinion paragraph.