1. Arson Flashcards

1
Q

What are the elements of section 267(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • Intentionally or recklessly
  • damages by fire or by means of any explosive
  • any property
  • if he or she knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the penalty for offences related to section 267(1) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

maximum of 14 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the elements of section 267(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally or recklessly
  • and without claim of right
  • damages by fire or by means of explosive
  • any immovable property, or any vehicle, ship or aircraft
  • in which that person has no interest.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the elements of section 267(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally
  • damages by fire or means of explosive
  • any immovable property, or any vehicle, ship or aircraft,
  • with intent to obtain any benefit or to cause loss to any other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the elements of section 267(2)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally or recklessly
  • and without claim of right
  • damages by fire or means of any explosive
  • any property
  • in which that person has no interest
  • other than the property referred to in subsection (1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the elements of section 267(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally or recklessly
  • damages by fire or means of any explosive
  • any property
  • other that the property referred to in subsection (1)
  • with intent to obtain any benefit or cause any loss
  • to any other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the penalty for offences related to section 267(2) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

maximum of 7 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the elements of section 267(3) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • Intentionally
  • damages by fire or means of any explosive
  • any property
  • with reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the penalty for section 267(3) of the crimes act 1961?

A

maximum of 5 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is intent?

A

Intent is the intention to commit an act with the intention to get a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does benefit mean under section 267(4) of the Crimes Act 1961? BPPPSV

A

In this section and section 269, benefit means any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service or valuable consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does ‘R v Collister’ say about Intent?

A

Circumstantial evidence from which an offenders intent may be inferred can include:
- the offenders action and words before, during and after the event
- the surrounding circumstances
- the nature of the act itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does acting ‘recklessly’ involve?

A

Acting ‘recklessly’ involves consciously and deliberately taking an unjustifiable risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is said in ‘Cameron v R’ in regards to establishing recklessness? (EPRCU)

A

Recklessness is established if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In ‘Cameron v R’ “a real possibility’ means substantively the same as what?

A

“a real possibility” means substantively the same as “could well happen”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an example of no social utility?

A

Russian Roulette or personal violence with a risk of serious injury or death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is an example of high social utility?

A

A surgeon undertaking a risky but potentially lifesaving surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What must be shown to prove recklessness?

A

When recklessness is an element in an offence the following must be proved:
1. That the defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk (a subjective test)
2. That the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were known to the defendant (objective test - based on whether a reasonable person would have taken the risk)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the objective test that must be shown to prove recklessness?

A
  1. That the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were known to the defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the subjective test that must be shown to prove recklessness?

A

That the defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What was held in ‘R v Archer’ regarding property damage?

A

Property may be damaged if it suffers:
- permanent or temporary physical harm or
- permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the three components required for fire to start or continue?

A

Fuel, Oxygen and Heat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is an ‘Explosive’ under section 2 of the Arms Act 1983?

A

Explosive means
- any substance, mixture or composition of substances
- which in its normal state
- is capable either of decomposition at such rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What must a device, contrivance or article be to be considered an explosive?

A

an integral part of the explosive for the purpose of producing an explosion or a ballistic or pyrotechnic effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are 5 examples of Explosives under the Arms Act 1983?

A

Gunpowder,
Nitroglycerine,
dynamite,
detonators,
cartridges and ammunition of all descriptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is not included in the definition of explosives under the Arms Act 1983?

A
  • Firearms
  • Fireworks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

When does the definition of explosives under Arms Act 1983 include a device, contrivance or articles?

A
  • when it uses any substance or mixture or combination of substances to which the definition of explosive applies and
  • is an integral part of the explosive for the purpose of producing an explosion or a ballistic or pyrotechnic effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is property under the Crimes Act 1961? R.P.D.O

A

Property includes:
- real and personal property and
- any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity and
- any debt and any thing in action and
- any other right or interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What does ‘Life’ mean in ‘Danger to Life’ in Section 267(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961

A

“Life” in this context means human life and the danger must be to the life of someone other than the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What does Simester and Brookbanks suggest about knowing?

A

Knowing means ‘knowing or correctly believing. The defendant may believe something wrongly but cannot ‘know’ something that is false’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

In relation to the tests for ‘knows or ought to know’ what questions are asked for the subjective test?

A
  • what was the defendant thinking at the time?
  • Did the defendant know that human life was likely to be endangered by his actions?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

In relation for the tests for ‘knows or ought to know’ what questions are asked for the objective test?

A
  • What would a reasonable person have thought in the same circumstances?
  • Would a reasonable person have recognised the risk?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Under the Crimes Act what is a claim of right?

A
  • A belief at the time of the act
  • in a proprietary or possessory right in property
  • in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

In relation to a claim of right what may the belief be based on?

A

the belief in a claim of right may be based on:
- ignorance or
- mistake of fact or
- of any matter of law other than the enactment which the offence is alleged to have been committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

In relation to a claim of right, what are the four beliefs required? POTD

A
  • First there must be a belief in a proprietary or possessory right in property
  • Secondly the belief must be about rights to the property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed.
  • Thirdly the belief must be held at the time of the conduct alleged to constitute the offence.
  • Fourthly The belief must actually be held by the defendant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

In relation to claim of right does the defendant have to have a personal proprietary or possessory right in the property?

A

No, the definition of claim of right does not require the defendant to believe that he or she personally has the relevant possessory right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

In Hayes v R the court held that the belief is not required to be reasonable or be reasonably held. How may the reasonableness of the belief be relevant?

A

The reasonableness may be relevant in determining whether the defendants assertion of belief in credible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

When will property be considered ‘immovable’?

A

Property will be considered immovable if it is currently fixed in place and unable to be moved, even though it may be possible to make it movable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What is the definition of a vehicle under the Land Transport Act 1998?

A

A vehicle is a contrivance equipped with wheels, tracks or revolving runners on which it moves or is moved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is included under the definition of a vehicle under the Land Transport Act 1998?

A

A vehicle includes hovercrafts, skateboards, in-line skates and roller skates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What is not included under the definition of a vehicle under the Land Transport Act 1998?

A

A vehicle does not include:
- a perambulator or pushchair
- a shopping or sporting trundler not propelled by mechanical power
- A wheelbarrow or hand trolley
- A pedestrian controlled lawnmower
- A pedestrian-controlled agricultural machine not propelled by mechanical power.
- An article of furniture
- A wheelchair not propelled by mechanical power
- Any other contrivance specified by the rules not to be a vehicle for the purposes of this definition
- any rail vehicle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What is the definition of ship under the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • Ship means every description of vessel used in navigation, however propelled;
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What is included in the definition of a ship?

A
  • any barge, lighter, dinghy, raft or like vessel
  • also includes any ship belonging to or used as a ship of the armed forces of any country
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is the definition of Aircraft under the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • Aircraft has the same meaning as in the Civil Aviation Act 1990 and
  • includes any aircraft for the time being used as an aircraft of the armed forces of any country other than New Zealand.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What is the definition of Aircraft under the Civil Aviation Act 1990?

A

Aircraft means:
- any machine
- that can derive support in the atmosphere from the reactions of the air
- otherwise that by the reactions of the air against the surface of the earth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What has been held by the courts about “interest” and “tenancy”?

A

The courts have held that tenancy of a property constitutes an interest in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What is the definition of “Obtains” under the Crimes Act 1961?

A

Obtain, in relation to any person, means obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person

48
Q

What was held in “R v Morley” in relation to “Loss”

A

Loss is assessed by the extent to which the complainants position prior to the offence has been diminished or impaired.

49
Q

What was held in “R v Morley” in relation to direct and indirect loss?

A
  • The court of appeal reviewed the nature of loss and held that ciminality could only arise from direct loss.
  • indirect losses such as expectation loss (loss of a bargain) and loss of anticipated future profits are not included
50
Q

What is included in the definition of person under the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • Real people
  • Companies and
  • Other organisations
51
Q

Why is it difficult to see how Parliament can have intended to include ‘recklessness’ under section 267(2)(b) of the crimes act?

A

Section 267(2)(b) requires that the offender has damaged property with intent to obtain a benefit or cause loss which follows that the offender caused the damage deliberately for that purpose. It seems inconsistent for a reckless act to intentionally cause loss or benefit.

52
Q

What is the title of section 268 of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

Attempted Arson

53
Q

What are the elements of attempted arson?

A
  • attempts to
  • commit arson
  • in respect of any immovable property or any vehicle, ship or aircraft
54
Q

What is the maximum penalty for attempted arson?

A

10 years imprisonment

55
Q

What is required for a person to be guilty of an attempt to commit an offence? (Intent & Steps)

A

The person must:
- Intent to commit the offence and
- take a real and substantial steps towards achieving that aim.

56
Q

What was held in ‘R v Harpur’?

A
  • The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops
  • the defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety
  • Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinate.
57
Q

What is the title for section 72 of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

Attempts

58
Q

In relation to attempted arson what must the crown prove in relation to intent?

A
  • The crown must prove that the defendant intended to commit the full act of arson and
  • acted as he or she did for the purposes of achieving that aim.
59
Q

When is an attempt ‘sufficiently proximate’ to the offence? (prep & commence)

A
  • When the defendant has progressed past the stage of preparation and
  • commenced a process intended to lead to the commission of the full offence
60
Q

What will the court analyse to assess proximity in an attempt? (Conduct, intent & steps)

A
  • the defendants conduct at the relevant time
  • in conjunction with evidence of his intent based on the circumstances and
  • any steps taken leading up to that point
61
Q

What was held in ‘R v Harpur’? (stops, entirety, remains)

A
  • The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops
  • the defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety
  • Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinate.
62
Q

When the courts referred to the American Model Penal Code what were examples of acts that may constitute an attempt?

A
  • lying in wait, searching for or following the contemplated victim
  • enticing the victim to go to the scene of the contemplated crime
  • reconnoitring the scene of the contemplated crime
  • unlawful entry of a structure, vehicle or enclosure in which it is contemplated that the crime will be commited
  • possession, collection or fabrication of materials to be employed in the commission of the crime
  • soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the crime
63
Q

What is the title of section 269 of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

Intentional Damage

64
Q

What are the elements of section 269(1) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally or recklessly
  • destroys or damages
  • any property
  • if he or she knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to result
65
Q

What is the maximum penalty for section 269(1) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

10 years imprisonment

66
Q

What are the elements of section 269(2)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally or recklessly
  • and without claim of right
  • destroys or damages
  • any property
  • in which that person has no interest
67
Q

What are the elements of section 269(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally or recklessly
  • and without claim of right
  • destroys or damages
  • any property
  • with intent to obtain any benefit or with intent to cause loss to any other person
68
Q

What are the elements of section 269(3) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • intentionally
  • destroys or damages
  • any property
  • with reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
69
Q

What is the maximum penalty for section 269(2) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

7 years imprisonment

70
Q

What is the maximum penalty for section 269(2) of the Crimes Act 1961?

A

7 years imprisonment

71
Q

What are the elements of section 272 of the Crimes Act 1961?

A
  • knowingly has in his or her possession or makes
  • any explosive substance or any dangerous engine, instrument or thing
  • with intent to use or enable another person to use
  • the substance, dangerous engine, instrument or thing to commit an offence
72
Q

In ‘R v Hallam’ what was held about ‘knowingly possessing an explosive substance’?

A

the crown must prove that:
- the offender knowingly had the the substance in his possession and
- also that he knew it to be an explosive substance

73
Q

What section is Intentional Damage (Danger to Life)?

A

Section 269(1) of the Crimes Act 1961

74
Q

What section is Intentional Damage (No Interest)?

A

Section 269(2)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961

75
Q

What section is Intentional Damage (Obtain Benefit/Cause Loss)?

A

Section 269(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961

76
Q

What section is Intentional Damage (reckless disregard for safety of other property)?

A

Section 269(3) of the Crimes Act 1961

77
Q

What section is attempts?

A

Section 72 of the Crimes Act 1961

78
Q

What section is attempted arson?

A

Section 268 of the Crimes Act 1961

79
Q

What section is Arson (Reckless disregard for the safety of other proeprty)?

A

Section 267(3) of the Crimes Act 1961

80
Q

What section is Arson (Obtain Benefit/Cause Loss)?

A

Section 267(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961

81
Q

What section is Arson (No Interest)?

A

Section 267(2)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961

82
Q

What section is Arson (Immovable Property, Obtain Benefit/Cause Loss)?

A

Section 267(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1961

83
Q

What section is Arson (Immovable Property, No Interest)?

A

Section 267(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961

84
Q

What section is Arson (Danger to Life)?

A

Section 267(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961

85
Q

What two arson offences do NOT include recklessness as an element?

A
  • Section 267(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1961 (Immovable Property, Obtain Benefit/Cause Loss)
  • Section 267(3) of the Crimes Act 1961 (Reckless Disregard for other Property)
86
Q

Fill in the blank:
Cameron v R held that Recklessness is established if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and
(b) ***

A

having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

87
Q

Fill in the Blanks
Cameron v R held that Recklessness is established if:
(a) ***
(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

A

the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:

88
Q

Fill in the blanks:
Cameron v R held that Recklessness is established if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(i) *** and/or
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

A

his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result;

89
Q

Fill in the Blanks:
Cameron v R held that Recklessness is established if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or
(ii) ******* and
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

A

that the proscribed circumstances existed;

90
Q

Fill in the blanks for R v Harpur:
- ****
- the defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety
- Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinate.

A

The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops

91
Q

Fill in the blanks for R v Harpur:
- The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops
- *******
- Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinate.

A

the defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety

92
Q

Fill in the blanks for R v Harpur:
- The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops
- the defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety
- ****

A

Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinate.

93
Q

While a fire is being fought all police present must co-operate with who?

A

The person in charge of the Fire Service at a fire, suspected fire or other emergency

94
Q

When will the fire service notify Police of a fire?

A
  • a fire results in serious injury or death
  • a fire is considered suspicious
95
Q

What is a FILO?

A

Fire Investigation Liaison Officer

96
Q

What are 5 responsibilities of a FILO?

A
  • attending every fire that results in death or serious injury
  • co-ordinating fire investigations in their designated area or district
  • arranging police attendance at fire scenes when required
  • maintaining effective working relationships with the relevant FSILO and Fire Service Specialist Fire Investigators
  • assisting areas or districts with fire investigation-related queries
97
Q

What is FSILO?

A

Fire Service Investigation Liaison officer

98
Q

What is a Specialist Fire Investigator?

A
  • An officer employed by FENZ who have received specialised training and assessment in fire investigation techniques.
  • They typically possess experience in firefighting and fire safety
99
Q

List 5 times when Specialist Fire Investigators be called to attend and investigate? FISSS

A
  • Fires were fatalities occur
  • fires where serious (life-threatening) fire-related injury has occurred
  • structure fires where the cause is suspicious or cannot be determined
  • significant fire spread across a property boundary
  • fires in buildings where built-in fire safety features have failed or not performed to known or expected standards
100
Q

How many Specialist Fire Investigators must attend a fire with a fire-related fatality or life-threatening injury

A

A minimum of two

101
Q

What are the two responsibilities of a FSILO?

A
  • arranging fire service specialist fire investigator attendance at fire scenes where requested by Police
  • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with relevant FILOs in the respective police district/areas
102
Q

What is the Polices responsibilities in a Fire Investigation?

A
  • Must conduct the criminal investigation or coronial enquiry
  • Must undertake responsibility for the protection, collection and recording of forensic evidence
103
Q

Who can collect and remove material from a fire scene?

A
  • Police
  • other agencies with the authority to remove items
104
Q

Who is responsible for the preservation, analysis and subsequent disposition of any materials removed from a fire scene?

A
  • Police
  • other agency with the appropriate authority to remove items
105
Q

What are five common injuries received at fire scenes?

A
  • inhalation of toxic substances
  • cut/wounds from sharp objects
  • airborne dusts, particles
  • tripping of fire debris
  • falling down, over, onto or into any obstructions or cavities.
106
Q

What are 5 items of protective clothing at a fire scene?

A
  • a suitable helmet
  • a pair of overalls
  • nose and mouth filter
  • gloves
  • safety glasses
107
Q

What are four fire scene risks?

A
  • Timber
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • Masonry
108
Q

What are 5 common methods of starting fires?

A
  • Candles
  • Chemical Igniters
  • Electrical Apparatus
  • Electric matches
  • Molotov Cocktails
109
Q

What are 3 non-intentional causes of fire?

A
  • Carelessness
  • Faults
  • Nature
110
Q

What are 5 examples of carelessness that can cause fires?

A
  • Misusing electricity
  • Children playing with matches or cigarette lighters
  • burning off paint
  • welding and other industrial processes
  • leaving clothes near heating
111
Q

What are 5 examples of what faults that cause fires can occur in?

A
  • chimneys and flues
  • appliances
  • televisions
  • electrical wiring - shorting/arcing
  • gas pipes and fitting
112
Q

What are 5 examples of fire caused by nature?

A
  • chemical reactions
  • the suns rays
  • lightning
  • static electricity
  • rodents eating through wires or building nests out of flammable material
113
Q

What are the steps to be taken on arrival to a fire scene?

A
  • Briefly interview your informant
  • secure and control the scene
  • Initial interview of Specialist fire investigator and OC of the first fire appliance to attend the scene
  • Interview the incident controller
  • conduct a preliminary examination
  • if suspicious regroup and hold a briefing conference
  • Confer with staff and determine a plan of action
  • Contact ECC and supply a sitrep
114
Q

What are four scene security considerations for Police?

A
  • Ensuring the scene is not interfered with
  • exclusion and control of on-lookers, property owners and other interested parties
  • preserving evidence
  • preventing looting
115
Q

What are the initial actions on fires involving explosives?

A
  • Consider secondary devices. Do not handle or interfere with anything unfamiliar
  • Do not use transmitting devices
  • Evacuate the scene to at least 100m. Take personal possessions with them.
  • If IED located seek help of NZDF
  • SITREP to COMMS
116
Q

What are the characteristics of damage caused by explosives?

A
  • Cratering
  • spread of debris
  • shredding of materials
  • an overlay of dust
  • shrapnel marks