1-4 Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Lampleigh v Brathwait

A

Exception to past consideration

Act must have been done at promisor’s request

Defendant asked for royal pardon and claimant then offered £100 for trouble

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Roscorla v Thomas

A

Past consideration is not sufficient consideration

Horse free from vice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Entores v Miles Far East

A

ACCEPTANCE must be communicated to the offeror

contract was made when company received acceptance by telex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Chappell v Nestle

A

Consideration need not be adequate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ward v Byham

A

When an existing duty is exceeded

Held mother exceeded legal duty by promising child would be well and happy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Errington v Errington and Woods

A

Revocation of a unilateral contract

Son and daughter in law making mortgage payments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Scotson v Pegg

A

Exception of performance of an existing duty

Where there is an existing contractual duty owed to a third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Williams v Roffey Bros

A

Exception to performance of existing duty

Completed work on time and there was a penalty clause for late completion, so came as a practical benefit to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Byrne + Co v Van Tienhoven

A

REVOCATION must be communicated

Withdrawal of offer was taken effect when received

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Felthouse v Bindley

A

Silence is not acceptance of an offer

Uncle offered to but horse from nephew and said if he doesn’t hear from him, he’ll take it as a yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dunlop v Selfridge

A

Privity of contract

Only parties to a contract can acquire rights and liabilities under it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adams v Lindsell

A

When a letter of acceptance is posted, a contract is formed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Edwards v Skyways

A

Rebuttable presumption that there is an intention to create legal relations in commercial agreements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Merritt v Merritt

A

Rebuttable presumption that there is no intention to create legal relations in social domestic agreements

Rebutted as not living together amicably

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ramsgate v Montefoire

A

An offer may lapse after a period of time, depending on the nature of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Harvey v Facey

A

Statements of price and invitations to treat are not offers capable of acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Hyde v Wrench

A

A counter offer kills the original offer and is a form of rejection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Currie v Misa

A

Definition of consideration

Some detriment to the promisor or some benefit to the promisee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Tweedle v Atkinson

A

Consideration must move from the promisee

20
Q

Glasbrook v Glamorgan

A

Exception to performance of existing duty rule, when a duty is exceeded

Minors asked police for extra protection

21
Q

Hartley v Ponsonby

A

Upward variation

Held more to do more than their existing contractual duty

17 crew jumped ship

22
Q

Combe v Combe

A

Condition for promissory estoppel

Must be used as a shield and not a sword

23
Q

Balfour v Balfour

A

Rebuttable presumption that there’s no intention to create legal relations in social/domestic agreements

No agreement as couple weren’t separated at the time

24
Q

Mountford v Scott

A

Consideration means party will not be able to revoke offer before acceptance

£1 consideration

25
Freeman v Lockyer
Apparent authority Someone acted as managing director of the firm and employed without authority
26
Pao on v Yiu Long
Exceptions to past consideration - Must be done at promisor’s request - Parties expect remuneration - Would be legally binding if first promised
27
Routledge v Grant
An offer can be revoked anytime before acceptance
28
Pinnel’s Case
Payment on due date of a lesser sum is not good consideration
29
Foakes v Beer
Followed pinnel’s case No consideration was given and so promise to take no further action was not legally binding
30
High trees
Promissory estoppel Agreement for reduction of the rent only remained operative as long as the conditions continued to exist
31
Stilk v Myrick
Performance of an existing duty is not consideration 2 sailors jumped ship
32
Hamer v Sidway
Consideration must be sufficient Refraining from doing things you’re legally able to do is consideration for promise to pay
33
White v Bluett
Consideration must be sufficient To stop moaning is not consideration
34
Brogden v Met Railway
Acceptance by conduct
35
Holwell Securities v Hughes
Postal rule can be excluded by the offeror, either expressly or impliedly “Notice in writing”
36
Re Selectmove
Silence is only accepted when the offeree imposes it upon himself
37
Barry v Davies
Auction is “without reserve” so the auctioneer is bound to sell to the highest bidder
38
The Brimnes
Notice will be effective on receipt where it’s reasonable to expect a person to be available to read it
39
Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council
Tenders are when business outsource functions
40
Dickinson v Dodds
Communication of revocation doesn’t have to be by or with authority of offeror, but must be reliable
41
Fisher v Bell
Invitation to treat Display of knife was invitation to treat
42
Boots
Invitation to treat
43
Spencer v Harding
Request for information
44
Carlill v Carbolic
Unilateral contract
45
Smith v Hughes
Intention to create a binding contract Objective approach, so look at what is said from point of view of reasonable person
46
D & C Builders v Rees
Condition for promissory estoppel Must be inequitable for promisor to go back on promise Exception to practical benefit consideration, if made under economic duress
47
Sale of Goods Act 1979, S.57
A sale by auction is complete on the fall of the gavel