06. Applications of DCF Techniques Flashcards
What is the NPV decision rule for project acceptance?
Accept all projects with a positive NPV.
Define capital rationing.
Capital rationing is a situation in which there is not enough finance (capital) available to undertake all available positive NPV projects. Therefore, capital has to be rationed.
Differentiate between hard capital rationing and soft capital rationing.
Hard capital rationing - the capital markets impose limits on the amount of finance available.
Soft capital rationing - the company sets internal limits on finance availability.
Differentiate between single-period and multi-period capital rationing.
Single-period capital rationing - capital is in short supply in only one period.
Multi-period capital rationing - capital is rationed in two or more periods
List 4 reasons why capital markets may restrict the funds available to a particular company.
- High business risk (ie the company’s operating cash flows are sensitive to the economic cycle).
- High country/political risk (ie there are concerns about corporate governance or state appropriation of assets).
- High financial risk (ie the company already has high existing levels of debt).
- Lack of reliable independent information available about the company. This is especially relevant to small- and medium- sized entities (SMEs).
What are 4 reasons why company directors or managers might restrict available funds for capital investment?
- A preference for slower organic growth to a sudden increase in size arising from accepting several large investment projects. This particularly applies in a family-owned business that wishes to avoid hiring new managers.
- Managers may wish to avoid raising further equity finance if this will dilute the control of existing shareholders.
- Managers may wish to avoid issuing new debt if their expectations of future economic conditions are such that an increased commitment to fixed interest payments would be unwise.
- To create an internal market for investment funds. This can be seen as a way of reducing the risk and uncertainty associated with investment projects, as it leads to only accepting projects with greater margins of safety.
What is a divisible project?
A project is divisible if the company can make any partial or proportionate investment in it (ie between 0% and 100%). However, the project cannot be repeated.
What is a non-divisible project?
A non-divisible or indivisible project must be done 100% or not at all.
Define equivalent annual cost (EAC). What is the formula for EAC?
The annual cost of owning, operating and maintaining an asset over its entire life.
EAC = NPV/Annuity Factor
Outline 3 limitations of replacement analysis.
- Like-with-like replacement (in perpetuity) is rarely possible even if desirable. Asset requirements may change over time.
- Changing technology may also require earlier replacement (eg of IT equipment) than suggested by the optimal solution.
- Non-financial factors (eg employees may be more satisfied if their company cars are replaced more often).
Outline one situation where using the EAB approach may be applicable.
If faced with mutually exclusive projects, where only one can be accepted and this same situation will be faced repeatedly (in perpetuity) and the projects have different lives, the equivalent annual benefit (EAB) approach can be used.
What two decisions must be made when deciding whether to lease or buy an asset? Outline these decisions.
- Investment decision - does the asset give operational benefits? This decision is made first. Discount cash flows from using the asset (sales, materials, labour, overheads, tax on net cash flows, etc) at the company’s WACC
- Financing decision - is it cheaper to buy or lease? Discount cash flows specific to each financing option at the after-tax cost of debt. The preferred financing option is that either the lowest NPV or cost.
What are some of the relevant cash flows to consider when buying or leasing an asset?
Buy asset
- purchase cost
- tax benefit of TAD
- scrap proceeds
Lease asset
- lease payments (assume all to be tax-allowable deductions)
- tax benefit of lease payments
Other costs maybe relevant depending on the terms of the lease agreement. Eg operational costs associated with the asset eg maintenance and insurance.
Interest payments are not relevant because they are accounted for in discounting the cost of capital.
What are some of the implications for a lease-versus-buy decision when a business is not in a tax paying position?
- There would be no tax benefit from TAD if the asset was bought.
- No tax benefit arises from the lease payments.
- There would be no tax shield on debt (ie interest expense on borrowings would not reduce tax expense). As such the pre-tax of debt should be used.
What is the formula for post-tax cost of debt given the pre-tax figure?
Post-tax cost of debt = pre-tax cost of debt * (1 - tax rate)