04 POST-EMPLOYMENT Flashcards
Who is an employee?
An employee includes:
1. Any person in the employ of an emplyer;
2. Any individual whose work has ceased as a reuslt of or in connection with any current labor dispute or because of any unfair labor practice if he has not obtained any other substantially equivalent and regular employment (LC Art 219f)
3. One who has been dismissed from work, but the legality of the dismissal is being contested in a forum of appropriate jurisdiction (DO No 40-03 as amended by A-1 Rule 1 Sec (s))
Who is an employer?
An employer includes:
1. One who employs the services of others, one for whom employees work and who pays their wages or salaries; or
2. Any person acting in the interest of an employer (DO No. 40-03 as amended by A-1 Rule I Sec. 1(f))
What are the tests to determine the existence of employer-employee relationship?
In determining the existence of employer-employee relationship, the following tests may be applied:
1. Four-fold test (Phil. Global Communications, Inc. v. De Vera, GR 157214)
2. Two-tiered test (Francisco v. NLRC GR 170087)
What is the four-fold test?
SPa-Dic
The four-fold test is a test to determine the existence of employer-employee relationship by considering the following factors:
1. Selection and engagement of the employee;
2. Payment of wages;
3. Power of Dismissal; and
4. Power to Control the employee’s conduct
What is the control test?
The control test, or means-and-method control test determines whether the employer controls or has reserved the right to control the employee not only as to the result of the work to be done but also as to the means and methods by which the same is to be accomplished. The greater the supervision and control the hirer exercises, the more likley the worker is deemed an employee (Sonza v. ABS CBN)
How can the elements of the four-fold test and the control test be established to prove employer-employee relationship?
There is no hard and fast rule designed to establish the aforesaid elements. Any competent and relevant evidence to prove the relationship may be admitted. Identification cards, cash vouchers, social security registration, appointment letters or employment contracts, payrolls, organization charts and personnel lists serve and evidence of employee status (Tenazas v. R Villegas GR 192998)
Note; To operate against an employer, proof of existence of such power is enough. The power of control need not have been actually exercised. The control test calls merely for the existence of the right to control the manner of doing the work not the acutal exercise of the right.
When does the two-tiered test apply in determining the existence of employer-employee relationship?
In certian cases, the control test is not sufficient to give a complete picture of the relatinoship between the parties, owing to the complexity of such a relationship where several positions have een held by the worker and where there is no written agreement or terms of reference to base the relationship on. The better approach would therefore be to adopt a two-tiered test involving:
1. The putative employe’s power to control the employee with respect to the means and methods by which the work is to be accomplished; and
2. The underlying economic realities of the activity or relationship. The proper standard of economic dependence which is an aspect to be considered under economic realities is whethr the worker is dependent on the alleged employer for his continued employment in that line of business.
What is the relationship between jeepney and taxi drivers and their operators under the boundary system?
The relationship between jeepney owners/operators on one hand and jeepney and taxi drivers on the other under the boundary system is that of an ee-er relationship and not of lessor-lessee.
In the case of jeepney owenrs/operators and jeepney drivers, the former exercise supervision and control over the latter. The owner as holder of the certificate of public convenience must see to it that the driver follows the route prescribed by the franchising authority and the rules promulgated as regards its operation. The fact that the drivers do not receive fixed wages but get only taht in excess of the so-called “boundary” they pay to the owner/operator is not sufficient to withdraw the relationship between them from thatof employer and employee.
The existence of a vendor-vendee relationship between the operator and the dirver under a boundary-hulog system which is essentially a contract to sell does not negate the existence of an employer-employee relationship.
What is the difference between employees and contractors?
Contractors often present themselves to possess unique skills, expertise or talent to distinguish them from ordinary employees.
The control test is the most important test our courts apply in distinguishin an employee from a contractor. This test is based on the extent of control the hirer exercises over a worker. The greater the supervision and control the hirer exercises, the more likely the worker is deemed an employee. The converse holds true as well - the less control the hirer exercises, the more likely the worker is considered a contractor. (Sonza v. ABS CBN)
The presumption is that when the work done is an integral part of the regular business of the employer and when the worker, rleative to the employer, does not furnish an independent business or professional service, such work is a regular employment of such employee and not an independent contracto (Begino v. ABSCBN)
What are the different kinds of employees?
RCP2-SF
1. Regular employees
2. Casual employees
3. Probationary employees
4. Project employees
5. Seasonal employees
6. Fixed-term employees
Who is a regular employee?
An employee is deemed regualr when:
1. The employee has been engaged to perform activities which are usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade of the employer (LC Art. 295)
2. A casual employee is allowed to work for at least 1 year, whether the same is continuous or broken, with respect to the activity in which he is employed and while such activity exists (LC Art. 295); and
3. An employee is allowed to work after the lapse of the probationary period (LC Art. 296)
What is the primary standard in determinig regular employment?
The primary standard in determining a regular employment is the reasonable connection between the particualr activity performed by the employee in relation to the usual business or trade of the employer. The test is whether the former is usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade of the employer.
Also, if the employer has been performing the job for at least 1 year, even if the performance is not continuous or merely intermittent, the law deems the reported and continuing need for its performance as sufficient evidence of the necessity if not indispensability of that activity to the business (De Leon v. NLRC 70705)
NOTE: The phrase “to perform activities which are usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade of the employer” includes performance of peripheral jobs indirectly related to the principal business of employer (Romares v NLRC 122927)
q
May a part-time employee be deemed regular?
Yes. One’s regularity of employment is not determined by the number of hours one works but by the nature and by the length of time one has been in that particualr job (Perpetual Help Credit Coop Inc. v. Faburada)
When shall a security guard be considered as a regular employee?
A security guard shall be considered as a regular employee when:
1. He/she is allowed to work after probationary period;
2. There is an absence of a valid probationary contract; or
3. He/she is affected by repeated hiring-firing-rehiring scheme for short periods of time, the aggregate duration of which is at least 6 months (DO No. 150-16, Sec. 3.3)
What is a casual employment?
Casual employees - those who are not regular, project or seasonal aemployees (LC Art. 295); generally those performing activities not usually necessary or desribale in the employer’s usual business or trade are casual employees (GMA Network v. Pabriga)
LC IRR - There is casual employment where an employee is engaged to perform a job work or service which is merely incidental to the business of the empl;oyer, and usch job, work or service is for a definit period made known to the employee at the time of the engagement
What is probationary employment?
A probationary employment is where the employee, upon his engagement, is made to undergo a trial period during which the employer determines his fitness to qualify for regular employment based on reasonable standards made known to him at the time of his engagement (Robinsons Galeria v. Ranchez).
A probationary employment gives the employer an opportunity to observe the fitness of a probationer while at work, and to ascertain whether he would be a proper and efficient employee (Canadian Opportunities Unlimited v. Dalanging)
What is the duration of probationary employment?
Probationary employment shall not exceed 6 months from the date the employee started working (LC Art. 296). The computation of the 6-month probationary period is reckoned from the date of appointment up to the same calendar date of the 6th month following (Cebu Royal Plant v. Dep. Minister of Labor)
NOTE: In the case of Alcira v. NLRC, the SC ruled that 6-month period is reckoned form the date of appointment up to the same calendar date of hte 6th month following. However in Mitsubishi Motors Phils. Corp. v. Chrysler, the SC consttrued the 6-month period as 180 days applying Article 13 of the NCC.