Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

03-10/05/16 > 04/05/16 > Flashcards

04/05/16 Flashcards

(75 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

Conrad Aim

A

STM coding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conrad Procedure

A

Acoustically similar/ dissimilar lists of letters with an acoustic confusion task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conrad Findings

A

Most made more mistakes on acoustically similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conrad Evaluation

A

Artificial task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Baddeley STM Aim

A

Coding- acoustic or semantic?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Baddeley STM Procedure

A

4 groups of 5 words (acoustically or semantically similar or dissimilar), had to recall in order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Baddeley STM Findings

A

Acoustically similar accuracy= 55%
Acoustically dissimilar accuracy= 75%
Semantic accuracy= similar but worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Baddeley STM Evaluation

A

Artificial task, backed up by Conrad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Baddeley LTM Aim

A

Coding- acoustic or semantic?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Baddeley LTM Procedure

A

4 groups of 5 words (acoustically or semantically similar or dissimilar), had to recall in order after doing a different task for 20 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Baddeley LTM Findings

A

Semantically similar accuracy= 55%
Semantically dissimilar accuracy= 85%
Acoustic accuracy= similar but worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Baddeley LTM Evaluation

A

Artificial task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Jacobs Aim

A

STM capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Jacobs Procedure

A

Serial digit span test, recall in order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jacobs Findings

A 
Digits= 9.3 
Letters= 7.3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Jacobs Evaluation

A

Artificial task,easy to replicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Standing Aim

A

LTM capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Standing Procedure

A

2,560 pictures, shown for 10 seconds each, at the end show new and old pictures and had to say if they’d seen it before

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Standing Findings

A

90% recognised new pictures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Standing Evaluation

A

Artificial task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Peterson and Peterson Aim

A

STM duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Peterson and Peterson Procedure

A

Given a trigram, had to count down from a 3 digit number, recall the trigram. Each trial had to count for longer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Peterson and Peterson Findings

A

76% correct at 3 seconds

10% correct at 18 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Peterson and Peterson Evaluation

A

Artificial task, standardised, alternative explanation= displacement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Bahrick Aim
LTM duration
26
Bahrik Procedure
392 ex-students with a 50 year span shown photos from their yearbook- had to recognise, or recall name
27
Bahrik Findings
Recognise after 15 years or less- 90% Recognise after 48 years or less- 60% Recall after 15 years or less- 60% Recall after 48 years or less- 30%
28
Bahrik Evaluation
Meaningful stimulus, confounding variables
29
CW
Viral infection affected his hippocampus Can't transfer STM to LTM Still understands world and remembers old memories Different memory stores
30
HM
Hippocampus removed due to epilepsy No new memories Still has old memories Different memory stores
31
Tulving Aim
Types of LTM
32
Tulving Procedure
Memory tasks whilst being scanned with a PET scanner
33
Tulving Findings
Episodic and semantic situated in the prefrontal cortex Semantic= left Episodic= right
34
KF
Poor STM, good visual- good procedural
35
Braver
Central executive tasks whilst having a brain scan- electrical activity increased
36
Baddeley
Visuo-spatial sketchpad: track light and class angles in F
37
Henk Schmidt Aim
Influence of retroactive interference
38
Henk Schmidt Procedure
Random 700 names from Dutch elementary school- 211 became participants, ages ranged from 11 to 79 years. Renamed roads in Molenburg with numbers and had to remember names. Also did a questionnaire about how many times they'd moved
39
Henk Schmidt Findings
Number of times moved was proportional to the accuracy of names
40
McGeoch and McDonald Aim
Similarity of memories affects interference
41
McGeoch and McDonald Procedure
Learnt 10 words until 100% accurate recall, then learnt a new list, then had to recall the old list
42
McGeoch and McDonald Findings
Synonyms= lowest recall Antonyms= 2nd lowest recall No relationship= highest recall
43
McGeoch and McDonald Evaluation
Artificial task, standardised
44
Godden and Baddeley Aim
Context dependent forgetting
45
Godden and Baddeley Procedure
Divers learnt and recalled words under water or on land- 4 variations
46
Godden and Baddeley Findings
40% lower in non-matching conditions
47
Carter and Cassidy Aim
State dependent forgetting
48
Carter and Cassidy Procedure
Antihistamine given or not, learnt and recalled words- 4 variations
49
Carter and Cassidy Findings
Worse when mismatched conditions
50
Loftus and Palmer Aim
Effect of leading questions of EWT
51
Loftus and Palmer Procedure
Film of car crash- asked at what speed they think the cars hit/ smashed/ collided/ bumped/ contacted
52
Loftus and Palmer Findings
``` Smashed= 40.8mph Contacted= 31.8mph ```
53
Loftus and Palmer Variation Procedure
Asked if there was any broken glass
54
Loftus and Palmer Variation Findings
Smashed- 32% said yes | Hit- 14% said yes
55
Loftus and Palmer Variation Evaluation
Controlled setting, artificial task
56
Gabbert Aim
Post event discussion
57
Gabbert Procedure
Saw the same crime video from different angles, then discussed it, then took individual recall tests
58
Gabbert Findings
71% mistakenly recalled things they hadn't seen | Control group- 0%
59
Gabbert Evaluation
Controlled, artificial task
60
Johnson and Scott Aim
Weapon effect- anxiety
61
Johnson and Scott Procedure
1. Heard argument when sat in the 'waiting room', a man came out of the next room with a pen and grease on his hands 2. Heard argument when sat in the 'waiting room', a man came out of the next room with a paper knife and blood on his hands
62
Johnson and Scott Findings
1. 49% accurate in identifying the man out of 50 other photos 2. 33% accurate in identifying the man out of 50 other photos
63
Johnson and Scott Evaluation
Natural setting, ethical issues
64
Yuille and Cutshall Aim
Anxiety
65
Yuille and Cutshall Procedure
Gun shop in Vancouver, the owner shot a thief dead 13/21 took part in the study 2-5 months later Rated stress on a 7-point scale
66
Yuille and Cutshall Findings
85% accurate in recall of details in high stress | 75% accurate in recall of details in low stress
67
Yuille and Cutshall Evaulation
No demand characteristics, ethical issues
68
Geiselman Aim
Effectiveness of cognitive interview
69
Geiselman Procedure
Watched police training crime videos | 89 students
70
Geiselman Findings
41. 5 items recalled using cognitive interview | 29. 4 items recalled using normal interview
71
Geiselman Evaulation
Similar error rates
72
Holliday Aim
Cognitive interview on children
73
Holliday Procedure
4-5 year olds and 9-10 year olds watched a 5 minute video of a birthday party
74
Holliday Findings
Cognitive interview= more correct results
75
Holliday Evaluation
Artificial task

03-10/05/16 (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions