02 Parliament Exam Q Planning Flashcards
Arguments for the House of Lords being an outdated institution and should be abolished?
- would fail to scrutinise legislation
- would fail to hold the government to account
- would be unrepresentative of wider society
Arguments against the House of Lords being an outdated institution that should be abolished?
- would scrutinise legislation
- would hold the government to account
- would represent wider society
Evidence to suggest the House of Lords fails to scrutinise legislation properly?
The EU Future Relations Act 2020
Was proposed to The House on 30th Dec 2020 and was passed on Dec 31st meaning both houses had little time to scrutinise the legislation
Evidence to suggest the House of Lords does scrutinise legislation properly?
The Lords blocked the Internal Markets Bill 433-165 and proposed 2 amendments which didn’t then break international law
Evidence to suggest the Lords can not hold the government to account properly?
Salisbury Convention
–cannot block a manifesto commitment
Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949
Evidence to suggest the House of Lords can effectively hold the government to account?
Lords blocked a trade agreement with genocide China 344-214.
Led to select committees having a say on trade deals with poor human rights records and also led to an amendment to the bill.
In the 2019-2020 Parliamentary session the lords blocked the government 53 times
Evidence to suggest the House of Lords is unrepresentative of wider society?
- 38% of the Lords are educated at Oxbridge compared to less than 1%
- 28% of them are women compared to 50% of society
Arguments to suggest that Parliament is an effective institution?
- holding government to account
- providing democratic legitimacy to decisions
- scrutiny of legislation
- representation
Arguments to suggest that Parliament is an ineffective institution?
- doesn’t hold government to account
- doesn’t provide democratic legitimacy to decisions
- doesn’t scrutinise legislation properly
- isn’t representative of society
Evidence to suggest Parliament is effective at holding the government to account?
-public and departmental select committees.
= 22nd April Health and Social Care Committee investigated govts handling into pandemic
Evidence to suggest that Parliament is ineffective at holding the government to account?
PMQs is an ‘event’
Conservatives created ‘departmental support groups’ under Cameron to launch insults at opposition when they disagreed
Evidence to suggest that Parliament provides democratic legitimacy to decisions?
HoC has the consent of the people
Turnout of 67% in 2019
Evidence to suggest that Parliament is ineffective at providing democratic legitimacy to decisions?
HoL is unelected.
FPTP system creates disproportionate results
No party is elected on more than 50% of the popular vote
Evidence to suggest that Parliament is effective at scrutinising legislation?
Public Bill Committees are set up which all MPs have to be apart of. House of Lords have crossbench MPs which are impartial and therefore make better decisions
Evidence to suggest that Parliament is ineffective at scrutinising legislation?
PBC are whipped to avoid govt embarrassment
Sarah Wollastone who was a former GP was denied access to the Heath and Social Care committee because of her experience in the field and the thought she may embarrass the government
Evidence to suggest that Parliament is representative of wider society?
Geographical. Every citizen in the UK is eligible to vote in UK GE.
Evidence to suggest that Parliament is not representative of wider society?
Socially, in 2019
38% of MPs were women. 50% wider society
29% privately educated. 7% of wider public
Arguments for the House of Commons is a more important institution than the House of Lords?
- it is all elected
- can remove or dismiss a govt or PM
- can control Public Finances
Arguments against the House of Commons being a more important institution than the House of Lords?
- examination of secondary legislation
- delaying primary legislation for up to a year
- as it is unelected, party control is less of an issue so more impartial decisions
Evidence to suggest the House of Commons is elected?
650 MPs
365 seats Conservative
202 seats Labour
Evidence to suggest the House of Commons can remove or dismiss a government or PM?
Theresa May survived a vote of no confidence in early 2019. However, it severely damaged her power and reputation so could be argued it led to her resignation in July 2019
Evidence to suggest the House of Commons can control public finances?
In January of 2021, MPs voted for the government to reduce universal credit by £20
Elected Rishi Sunak gave the Budget in March 2021
Evidence to suggest the House of Lords examines secondary legislation?
Secondary Legislation Scrunity Committee are set up
—- expressed concerns about checks on people not self-isolating after coming back from abroad
Evidence to suggest that the House of Lords can delay legislation for up to a year?
The Lords defeated a bill for the 14th time that would of allowed centralised power to Westminster in terms of trade agreements regarding devolved nations
Evidence to suggest that the current House of Lords remains impartial because of it being unelected?
Lord Dannat (crossbencher) has no party affiliation. He was a former member of the military and now lends his expertise to the House when needed
Arguments to suggest that Parliament is a representative institution?
- geographical representation. Commons
- social representation
- political representation