02 - Buy and Sell, Share Buyback Flashcards
Estate Duty Act - sec 3 (3) (a) (i)
Policy payable to child/spouse of decease under duly registered ante/post nuptial contract
Estate Duty Act - sec 3 (3) (a) (iA)
Buy and Sell policies
- Policy must be taken out by a person (both must be persons)
- Partner or Co-shareholder or Co-member in the same entity on date of death
- Purpose of enabling policyholder to acquire part or all of deceased’s shareholding/interest AND any claim by deceased against the company (e.g. shareholders loan)
- No premium was paid or borne by deceased.
Value of the policy must be in line with the actual value of the shareholding/interest.
If all four requirements are met - deemed to be free of estate duty
Estate Duty Act - sec 3 (3) (a) (ii)
Keyman policies
except where the provisions of paragraph (i) or (iA) of this proviso apply, the Commissioner is satisfied and remains satisfied that
(1) Initiated - such policy was not effected by or at the instance of the deceased,
(2) Premium paid - that no premium on such policy was paid or borne by the deceased,
(3) Payment to estate - that no amount due or recoverable under such policy has been or will be paid into the estate of the deceased
(4) Payment to connected parties - and that no such amount has been or will be
- - paid to, or utilized for the benefit of, any relative of the deceased
- - or any person who was wholly or partly dependent for his maintenance upon the deceased
- - or any company which was at any time a family company in relation to the deceased;
If sec. 3(3)(a)(ii) does not apply,
the death claim value of the policy will fall in the estate for estate duty purposes and will potentially cause estate duty.
The level to which provision should be made for estate duty depends on whether the deceased was also a shareholder in the business – Estate Duty Act - sec. 4(p)
Trust - Buy and Sell Agreement
1) Mr A - natural person, Mr B - Trustee A person (Mr B) has transferred their shares into a intervivos trust.
Mr A dies - Sell to Trust B - Estate duty not applicable
(Trust takes out policy on Mr A)
Mr B dies - Sell to Mr A - Estate duty applicable (premiums + 6% interest are deductible from proceeds)
(Mr A takes out policy on Mr B - Trustee)
Where it breaks down is in requirement 2 - both parties must both on shares at date of death - SARS, allows for exception if Trust has policy in natural person.
2) Mr A - Trustee, Mr B - Trustee
Does not meet requirement two.
ITA - Eighth Schedule - Para 55 (1) (a) (i)
A person must disregard any capital gain or capital loss determined in respect of a disposal that resulted in the receipt by or accrual to that person of an amount—
Para 55 (1) (a) (i) If the policy is disposed of by/paid out to the original beneficial owner of the policy then it is exempt from CGT.
ITA - Section 1 - Dividend
Definition of dividend
-includes any amount transferred or applied by a company that is a resident
- for the benefit or on behalf of any person
- in respect of any share in that company,
- whether that amount is transferred and applied as consideration for the acquisition for any share in that company
- BUT does not included any amount so transferred or applied to the extent that the amount so transferred or applied results in a reduction of the contributed tax capital of the company.
Company must make a determination that the portion of the buy back is capital related.
What is Contributed Tax Capital and what is included?
Tax exempt - if payment is related to reduction in tax capital
1973 Act - Share premium = Tax capital
2008 Act - No par value - Therefore all Tax capital
Resident
Non resident
Tax Capital
Dividends and Dividend Tax
Capital Gains/Loss
Upon Death - ITA - Eighth Schedule - Para 40
- Death = Disposal of asset for proceeds at market value.
- Executor sells shares at tax capital value thought it is worth the entire share buy back value and therefore incurs a capital loss
- Executor will be liable for the dividend tax on the dividend portion of the share buyback.
- Capital loss incurred by executor of estate is a clogged loss (ITA - 8th Schedule - para 39; transaction between connected persons)
ITA - Eighth Schedule - Para 40
Death = Disposal of asset for proceeds at market value.
There base cost of estate = market value
Using a Life policy in the case of a share buyback
- Policy is dutiable (estate).
- Premiums not deductible under Sec 11 (w) (ii)
Share value property in estate
On death, shareholder deemed to have disposed of shares at proceeds equal to MV
The estate will sell the shares back to the company. The base cost will be the MV at date of death and proceeds will exclude the portion of proceeds that is a dividend.
Under which regulations is a company allowed to buy back their own shares?
A company may buy back its own shares.
The company must comply with sec. 46 and sec. 48 of the 2008 Companies Act.
The 2008 Act (sec. 4) stipulates a solvency and liquidity test that must be complied with.
Repurchased shares becomes authorised un- issued shares.
Why would a company buy back its own shares?
- To buy out a troublesome minority shareholder.
- To maintain family control of a private company.
- To facilitate employee share schemes.
- As an alternative to co-shareholders buying the shares from a deceased shareholder’s executor under a buy-and-sell agreement.
The main safeguards against abuse are the solvency and liquidity test and the personal liability directors may incur under sec. 77.
What are the solvency and liquidity tests that must be complied with?
Solvency and liquidity test (s.4) - Companies Act
- Solvency and liquidity test
(1) For any purpose of this Act, a company satisfies the solvency and liquidity test at a particular time if,
considering all reasonably foreseeable financial circumstances of the company at that time—
(a) the assets of the company, as fairly valued, equal or exceed the liabilities of the company, as fairly valued; and
(b) it appears that the company will be able to pay its debts as they become due in the ordinary course of business for a period of—
- (i) 12 months after the date on which the test is considered; or
- (ii) in the case of a distribution contemplated in paragraph (a) of the definition of “distribution” in section 1, 12 months following that distribution.
Is a buy-back a distribution?
ITA - Section 1
“distribution” means a direct or indirect—
(a) transfer by a company of money or other property of the company, other than its own shares,
to or for the benefit of one or more holders of any of the shares, or to the holder of a beneficial interest in any such shares, of that company or of another company within the same group of companies, whether—
(i) … ;
(ii) … ;
(iii) as consideration for the acquisition—
(aa) by the company of any of its shares, as contemplated in section 48;
What is the process for authorising distributions? (Companies Act Sec 46.)
Companies Act sec 46. Distributions must be authorised by board.—
(1) A company must not make any proposed distribution unless—
(a) the distribution—
- (i) is pursuant to an existing legal obligation of the company, or a court order; or
- (ii) the board of the company, by resolution, has authorised the distribution;
(b) it reasonably appears that the company will satisfy the solvency and liquidity test immediately after completing the proposed distribution; and
(c) the board of the company, by resolution, has acknowledged that it has applied the solvency and liquidity test, as set out in section 4, and reasonably concluded that the company will satisfy the solvency and liquidity test immediately after completing the proposed distribution.
(2) When the board of a company has adopted a resolution contemplated in subsection (1) (c), the relevant distribution must be fully carried out, subject only to subsection (3).
(3) If the distribution contemplated in a particular board resolution, court order or existing legal obligation has not been completed within 120 business days after the board made the acknowledgement required by subsection (1) (c), or after a fresh acknowledgement being made in terms of this subsection, as the case may be—
(a) the board must reconsider the solvency and liquidity test with respect to the remaining distribution to be made pursuant to the original resolution, order or obligation; and
(b) despite any law, order or agreement to the contrary, the company must not proceed with or continue with any such distribution unless the board adopts a further resolution as contemplated in subsection (1) (c).
Who can be held liable if a distribution was authorised even though sec 4 requirements (solvency and liquidity) were not met?
Companies Act - Sec46.
(6) A director of a company is liable to the extent set out in section 77 (3) (e) (vi) if the director—
(a) was present at the meeting when the board approved a distribution as contemplated in this section, or participated in the making of such a decision in terms of section 74; and
(b) failed to vote against the distribution, despite knowing that the distribution was contrary to this section.