010 Flashcards
Violence
Liability
Aggravated Wounding
Section 191(1)(a) OR (b) OR (c), Crimes Act 1961 14 years
- (a) With intent to commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence OR
(b) With intent to avoid detection of himself or any other person in the commission of an imprisonable offence OR
(c) With intent to avoid arrest or facilitate flight of himself or any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of an imprisonable offence. - Wounds any person OR
Maims any person OR
Disfigures any person OR
Causes GBH to any person OR
Stupefies any person OR
Renders unconscious any person OR
By any violent means renders any person incapable of resistance
Violence
Liability
Aggravated injuring
Section 191(2), Crimes Act 1961 7 years
- (a) With intent to commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence OR
(b) With intent to avoid detection of himself or any other person in the commission of an imprisonable offence OR
(c) With intent to avoid arrest or facilitate flight of himself or any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of an imprisonable offence. - Injures
- Any person
Violence
Liability
Aggravated Assault
Section 192(1)(a) (b) or (c), Crimes Act 1961 3 years
- (a) With intent to commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence OR
(b) With intent to avoid detection of himself or any other person in the commission of an imprisonable offence OR
(c) With intent to avoid arrest or facilitate flight of himself or any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of an imprisonable offence. - Assaults
- Any person
Violence
Difference between section 188(1) & (2), Intent vs Outcome? #
Under section 188, subsection (1) and (2) both relate to actions that result in wounding, maiming, disfiguring, or GBH to the victim. So the outcome is the same; the distinction between the two subsections is the offender’s intent.
Violence
Proving intent in serious assault cases?
8 Examples #
- Prior threats
- Evidence of premeditation
- The use of a weapon
- Whether are weapon used was opportunistic or purposely brought
- The number of blows
- The degree of forced used
- The body parts targeted by the offender (e.g. the head)
- The degree of resistance or helplessness of the victim (e.g. unconscious)
Violence
R v Taisalika
The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced on the complainant’s head would point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.
Violence
R v Hunt (transferred Malice)
Malice against the person cut is not essential; general malice is sufficient
Violence
Grievous Bodily Harm
Grievous bodily harm can be defined simply as “harm that is really serious”.
Violence
DPP v Smith
“Bodily harm” needs no explanation and “grievous” means no more and no less than “really serious”.
Violence
R v Waters (Wounds)
A wound involves the breaking of the skin and the flowing of blood, either externally or internally.
Violence
Maiming
Will involve mutilating, crippling or disabling part of the body so victim is deprived of the use of a limb or any of the senses. Needs to be some degree of permanence.
Violence
Intent
In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intention in an offence. First there must be an intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result.
Violence
Disfigures
To “disfigure” means “to deform or deface; to mar or alter the figure or appearance of a person”.
Violence
R v Rapana and Murray (Disfigures)
The word ‘disfigures’ covers “not only permanent damage but also temporary damage’.
Violence
Injure – Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
Means to cause actual bodily harm.
Violence
R v Donovan
‘bodily harm’… includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim… it need not be permanent, must be, no doubt, be more than merely transitory and trifling.
Violence
With reckless disregard for the safety of other?
While it is necessary to prove that the defendant foresaw the risk of injury to others, it is not necessary that he recognised the extent of the injury that would result.
Violence
R v Harney #
Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk. In NZ it involves proof that the consequence complained of could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of the risk.
Violence
R v Tihi (Agg wounding)
In addition to one of the specific outlined in paragraph (a) (b) (c) “it must be shown the offender either meant to cause the specified harm or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to risk of suffering it”.
Violence
Sub section (a) Facilitate the commission
To make possible or to make easy or easier.
Under Section 191(1)(a) ‘it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove the intended crime was actually subsequently committed” – R v Strum
Violence
Sub Section (b) Avoid detection
Offences under section 191 (1)(b) arise during the commission of an imprisonable, where the offender causes the specified harm to prevent himself or another person from being “caught in the act”.
Violence
Sub section (c) Facilitate flight
To make possible or to make easy or easier.
The specified harm is caused to enable the offender(s) to more easily effect their escape, or to prevent their capture after the commission or attempted commission of an imprisonable offence.
Violence
Imprisonable offence: section 5, CPA 2011
Imprisonable offence means, in the case of an individual, an offence punishable by imprisonment for life or by term of imprisonment.
Violence
R v Wati (Agg wounding)
There must be proof of the commission or attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault or by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate.