01 Intro to Dispute Resolution Flashcards
What is the Latham Report?
1994 report on issues in the UK construction industry
(Sir Michael Latham)
What is ADR?
(Alternative Dispute Resolution) - all non-court dispute resolution solutions.
Traditional Dispute Resolution is essentially litigation = court
Consensual vs Adjudicative Dispute Resolution
Adjudicative: A decision is imposed on the parties in dispute
Consensual: The parties resolve the dispute by agreement
How many of the seven forms of Adjudicative Dispute Resolution can you name?
Litigation
Arbitration
Statutory Adjudication
Contractual Adjudication
Expert Determination
Binding Reference
Dispute Resolution Boards
Forms of Consensual Dispute Resolution
Negotiation
Mediation
Conciliation
On-site Neutral
Mini-trial
Typical objectives when a dispute arises
A fast resolution?
Maintaining relationships?
Setting a precedent (or not)?
Revenge?
Extract maximum payment?
Avoiding Pyrrhic victories?
Legalistic vs commercial approach
Eight factors in selecting a dispute resolution method
= Speed
= Cost (inc recovery of expense)
= Decision - quality, finality and privacy
= Practical expertise of the decision maker
= Preserving relationships
= Finding creative solutions
= right to appeal
= Points of law
Indicative speed of dispute resolution options
Sheriff court (Scotland) - 2 years?
Commercial court (England and Wales) - 9 months?
Arbitration - 6 months?
Adjudication - 28 days?
Expert decision - 1 week?
Mediation - 2 days?
What factors influence the importance of ‘Quality of decision’ in choosing a DR route?
Is legal correctness a priority?
Who will be the decision maker?
Speed vs understanding (speed of the process vs time needed to understand and consider the issues)
Is ‘rough justice’ sufficient?
Expertise of the decision maker in choosing a DR route
Legal knowledge vs practical experience
A JUDGE knows the law but probably no practical experience of the subject area. Will default to black and white of the law.
For a commercial person, commercial/common sense may prevail.
ARBITRATORS, ADJUDICATORS and EXPERT DETERMINERS will have subject matter knowledge but usually no legal training.
Arbitration is ‘going to a business person for a business decision’
Cost considerations in choosing a DR route
Cost of legal representation - is it compulsory?
Fees to the decision maker? i.e. Arbiter, clerk etc.
Cost of any claims consultants or expert witnesses.
Venue costs?
Recoverability of legal expenses?
‘Finality of decision’ considerations in choosing a DR route
- Is the decision final and binding?
- Is there a right of appeal? If so To whom? Sheriff? Inner house? Supreme court?
- Range of circumstances in which the decision can be challenged?
Privacy considerations in choosing a DR route
confidentiality vs maximum exposure/publicity?
Using publicity (or threat of) as a dispute resolution tool?
In what circumstances might it be prudent to preserve commercial relationships, influencing a DR route?
- Commercial relationship ongoing
- Ongoing contract
- Potential for future contracts
People really don’t like being sued or dragged to court. It is antagonistic.
Creative outcomes in choosing a DR route
Win/lose = winner takes all, determines right and wrong
lose/lose = neither side is happy
Win/win = looking beyond the sum in dispute
Enforceability considerations in choosing a DR route
Automatic?
Enforcement by the courts?
International enforceability?
Litigation - benefits
= Adjudicative
= Long established (one of the longest)
= Decision is imposed strictly under the law
= Decision can be appealed
Litigation - negatives
- Slow (though depends on which court used)
- costly (legal and court fees). 40 - 70% of costs recoverable
- no creative solutions, decision under the law
- unlikely to preserve relationships
- Public decision