section numbers and cases Flashcards
s9 WA - formalities for a will
- in writing
- signed by the testator in front of both witnesses
- signed by each witness in front of the testator, but not necessarily in each other’s presence
s15 WA
if beneficiary or spouse of beneficiary witnesses the will, the gift will fail UNLESS:
- there are two additional witnesses not caught by s15 WA, or
- will is subsequently republished by a properly executed codicil with different witnesses, or
- professional executor is a witness (s15 WA won’t invalidate their remuneration)
further:
- the will remains valid
- beneficiary’s appointment as executor remains valid
s28(4)(a) Trustee Act 2000
confirms s15 WA will not apply to the remuneration the professional executor will receive for acting in this role
Banks v Goodfellow
a testator will have testamentary capacity if they:
- Understand the nature of the act
- Appreciate the extent of their property
- Are aware of the moral claims they ought to consider, and
- No disorder of the mind
Parker v Felgate
exception to the rule that a testator should have capacity on execution of the will.
- testator must have had capacity when giving instructions
- testator must have known they were making a will in line with will instructions they had given previously
Golden rule in Kenward v Adams
when taking instructions from a client who is elderly or seriously ill, A medical practitioner should be instructed to make an assessment of the testator’s capacity, and a contemporaneous record of the assessment and conclusion should be made.
Wharton v Bancroft
Acknowledges that it can be challenging to find a practitioner willing to carry out the assessment
A failure to comply will not automatically demonstrate poor practice
s18(1) MCA
statutory wills
authorises a court to make a will on behalf of someone who does not have the capacity to make one themselves
s33 AEA
the PRs of an intestate deceased hold the undisposed of property on trust with power to sell
s46 AEA
statutory order of entitlement:
- surviving spouse/CP (by 28 days) and/or issue (lineal descendants - grandkids, legit, illegit, adopted, conceived but unborn)
- parents
- whole-blood siblings on the statutory trusts
- half-blood siblings (share one parent) on the statutory trusts
- grandparents
- whole-blood uncles and aunts on the statutory trusts
- half-blood uncles and aunts (shares one grandparent) on the statutory trusts
- the Crown as bona vacantia
s 46(2A) AEA
spouse’s entitlement under the intestacy rules depends on whether they survive the deceased by 28 days
s 21 WA - manuscript alterations
no obliteration, interlineation, or other alteration made…after the execution…shall be valid or have any effect…except so far as the words…before such alteration shall not be apparent, unless the alterations shall be executed in like manner as…required for the execution of a will
Cooper v Bockett
rebuttable presumption that unattested manuscript alterations were made after execution (and is therefore invalid) unless evidence is produced to rebut this
invalid»_space; original wording is effective
Lemage v Goodban
If there are no express words of revocation, there is a rebuttable presumption that the terms of the original will remain where possible
The codicil will only revoke an earlier will to the extent there is inconsistency between them
How can a codicil correct problems with an earlier will/codicil?
- s15 WA effects can be avoided if codicil is witnessed by different witnesses who are also not beneficiaries or spouses of beneficiaries
- s21 WA effects on unattested alterations can be avoided, provided these are made before the codicil is executed, and the codicil must expressly refer to the alterations it confirms
- if due execution had not originally taken place, due execution of a codicil will validate the original will or previous codicil for s9 WA purposes