Competitive Readiness Flashcards
What does “PAS” stand for?
What does “PAS” stand for?
Post-Approval Study
ACE-PAS – What is the effectiveness objective?
To evaluate shock effectiveness in converting ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF)
ACE-PAS - What is the Primary Endpoint?
Overall shock conversion rate
[percent of spontaneous episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) successfully converted with one or more shocks] =89.0%
ACE-PAS - What is the Secondary Endpoint?
First shock conversion rate
[percent of spontaneous episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) converted with a single shock] (report only)
ACE-PAS - Why did they choose a goal of “89%” as their conversion rate for VT & VF?
The overall performance goal is based on results from LifeVest German Registry data in which the overall shock conversion rate was 94.0% for 163 appropriate shocks delivered in a population of 6,043 patients. Applying a non-inferiority margin of 5% results in a performance goal of 89%.
ACE-PAS - How many shocks do they need to meet their endpoint?
271 Shocks
ACE-PAS - How many patients do they anticipate needing to be enrolled to accomplish their endpoint?
5179 Enrolled Patients
ACE-PAS Progress – “Late Breaking News” - How many patients are actually enrolled vs how many are needed?
9,573 vs need 17,205
Safety Objective of ACE-PAS?
To evaluate the prevalence of inappropriate shocks.
(Think: ACE-PAS, Pass the test)
ACE-PAS Primary Safety Endpoint?
Inappropriate shocks per patient-month of use
[total inappropriate shocks/cumulative months of device use for all patients] = 0.0075
ACE-PAS Secondary Safety Endpoint?
Inappropriate shock rate
[percent of patients who experience at least one inappropriate shock] (report only)
ACE-PAS Rational for Safety Endpoint
Based on results from two registry studies and the manufacturer reported rate which cumulatively report 0.0071 inappropriate shocks per patient month
(1363 inappropriate shocks/191,743 months of cumulative wear time). The upper bound of a two-sided 95% confidence interval around 0.0071 is 0.0075.
What is the LifeVest inappropriate shock rate?
0.9%
from WCD Meta Analysis of 19,882 patients
Response to a Kestra Key selling message,
“Contemporary Garment: Quality, comfort, built-in bra for women”
LifeVest next generation garment
> 1 Million Patients over a 20-year period!!!
Name the 5 aspects of the LifeVest Next Generation Garment (add a WIFM)
- Designed for comfort - lightweight and breathable, following the latest trends in performance wear
- Plastic Snaps - low profile increase comfort
- Strap Materials - softer, more comfortable, double plush material
- Electrode Attachment - 360 degree placement of electrodes for cord management
- Front closure - butterfly clasp for patients with dexterity issues
(Hint: Comfort, Snaps, Straps, Electrodes, Butterfly – “BECSS”
“I provide comfort, yet I hold you tight, With snaps and straps, I fit just right. My electrodes may help in a different way, And a butterfly’s touch can brighten your day. What am I?”)
Response to a Kestra Key selling message,
“Reduction in alarms yields better patient compliance”
Arrythmia alarms both false and positive occurred in 72% of the participants w/ 9.6% of the participants being exposed to more than 100 alarms over the 90 day period
What % of LifeVest treatments occur at a rate less than 170bpm?
11%
What Innovation was added in 2018 to LifeVest?
TruVector
56% relative reduction in total arrythmia alarms
0 median false alarms
AArD was designed to reduce an already low rate of false detections
Describe AArD
AArD is a machine learning classifier that determines if input is noise or artifact
Designed to filter additional false detections
caused by non-physiological signal artifact
and noise
When was AArD introduced vs when was AArD standard in all WCDs?
Introduced in 2018; standard in all LifeVest WCDs since 2019