chapter 2 (criminal courts/lay people) Flashcards
criminal courts/ lay people (67 cards)
What is the Magistrates Court?
There are about 160 Magistrates’ courts in England and Wales. They were established as local courts and deal with cases that have a connection with their geographical area.
Cases are heard by magistrates, who may either be legally qualified District judges or non- legally qualified lay magistrates.
What is the jurisdiction for the Magistrates Court?
- To try all Summary cases
- To try any triable either way cases that can be dealt with in the Magistrates court
- To deal with the first hearing of all indictable offences
- To deal with all preliminary matters connected to criminal cases, such as issuing warrants for arrest and deciding bail applications
5.To try cases in the Youth Court where defendants are aged 10-17 inclusive.
What is the jurisdiction for the Crown Court?
The Crown Court currently sits in about 84 different locations throughout England and Wales. Each year the Crown Court deals with about 80,000 cases
The Crown Court deals with all indictable, or serious offences. It also deals with any triable either way offences that are sent for trial from the Magistrates Court.
A judge sits alone to hear pre- trial matters in cases at the Crown court and where a defendant pleads guilty.
However, when a defendant pleads not guilty, a jury will be used to decide the verdict. The judge will..
-Control the court
-rule on relevant issues of law
-direct the jury on the law and evidence
-impose a sentence if the defendant is found guilty
What are summary offences?
These are the least serious criminal offences and have to be tried in the Magistrates’’ Courts. They are subdivided into offences of different ‘levels’ which carry maximum fines.
Examples of summary offences include driving while disqualified, common assault, being drunk and disorderly in a public place and theft from a shop where the value of goods stolen is less than £200.
What are Triable either way offences?
These offences can be tried in either the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court . If it is decided that the case will be dealt with in the Magistrates’ court, then the procedure is the same as for trial of a summary offence. The only difference is that, if the defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty , the Magistrates have the power to send the defendant to the crown court for sentencing. The magistrates can only do this if they think that they cannot impose an adequate sentence.
If the case is tried in the Crown Court, the trial will proceed in the same way as an indictable offence. If the defendant pleads or is found guilty, the judge can impose any sentence up to the maximum for that offence.
Triable either way offences include assault causing ABH and theft of property over £200
What are Indictable offences?
These are the most serious offences and can only be tried in the Crown Court. The first preliminary hearing to establish the defendants identity will take place in the Magistrates’ court.
If the defendant pleads not guilty, a jury will decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty after hearing all the evidence
If the defendant pleads guilty, the judge will impose a sentence.
Examples of indictable offences include murder, manslaughter and robbery.
What are the Pre- trial procedures for summary offences?
-There is a case management system which aims to complete the case at the earliest opportunity. At the first hearing, the clerk of the court will check the defendants name and address and take the plea. Over 90% of defendants in the Magistrates’ Court plead guilty.
-Whether or not the defendant has legal representation, the magistrates will proceed to consider a sentence if the defendant has pleaded guilty. A sentencing hearing will hear the brief facts of the offence from the prosecution and any statements the defendant wishes to make. The magistrates will then decide on and announce their sentence.
-In some minor driving offences, the defendant can plead guilty by post, so that attendance at court is not necessary.
- If the defendant pleads not guilty, the magistrates will try discover the issues involved and then set a date for trial.
What are the pre-trial procedures for Triable either way offences?
- The procedure is set out in the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980
-Plea before venue: The defendant will be asked to plead. If the plea is guilty, the matter is automatically heard by the magistrates court and a sentence hearing will take place in the same way as a summary offence. The magistrates will hear the facts of the case and decide if their sentencing powers are sufficient. If sufficient they will sentence but if insufficient, they will send to the crown court for sentencing.
- If the defendant pleads not guilty, the magistrates’ must decide where the case will be tried and a mode of trial procedure will take place. If the magistrates’ accept jurisdiction than the defendant decides where they want the trial heard. If they reject jurisdiction then the defendant is sent to the crown court for trial.
-The defendant has no right to request a hearing at the crown court but the case can be sent there by the magistrates if they consider they have insufficient sentencing powers.
-Mode of trial procedure- this procedure is to decide the most appropriate court for the case to be dealt with. Under the Magistrate’s Courts Act 1989 the magistrates’ must consider the nature and seriousness of the case, their own powers of punishment and any representation of the prosecution and defence.
What are pre-trial procedures for Indictable offences?
- First hearing: The first hearing will be in the Magistrates’ Court shortly after the defendant is charged. The magistrates’ will deal with:
-establishing the defendants identity
-whether bail or custody should be ordered
-whether the defendant should receive legal aid for representation
all further pre-trial matters will then be dealt with in the crown court, by a crown court judge, sitting alone
2.Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing (PTPH):
This takes place in the Crown Court as son as possible after the case has been sent there from the Magistrates’ Court. An effective PTPH will..
-Arraign the defendant (take Ds plea)
-set a trial date
-Identify the issues for trial, so far as they are known at that stage
-Provide a timetable for pre-trial preparation and give appropriate directions for an effective trial.
- Make provision for any Further Case Management Hearing that may be required to take place.
3.The Indictment: This document will be prepared before trial and formally sets out the charges against the defendant. Although the defendant will have been sent to trial with specific crimes, the indictment can be drawn up for any further offences that the evidence reveals. In more complicated cases, the indictment may have several charges each relating to a different offence.
- Disclosure by Prosecution and Defence:
Both prosecution and defence have to make certain points known to the other before trial. The prosecution must set out all the evidence they propose to use at the trial. They must also disclose previously undisclosed material.
The defence must give a written statement to the prosecution that includes:
- the nature of the accused’s defence, including any legal defences intended to be relied on
-any matters of fact on which issue is taken with the prosecution
-any point of law to be argued, and the case authority in support
-any alibi and the witness to support the alibi- this information allows the prosecution to run police checks on the alibi witnesses.
Appeals from the Magistrates’ Courts to the Crown courts
There are two different routes of appeal from the Magistrates’ Court. The route used will depend on whether the appeal is only on a point of law or whether it is for other reasons.
Appeals from Magistrates’ courts to Crown court: This appeal is only available to the defence. If the defendant pleaded guilty at the Magistrates’ court, then an appeal can only be made against sentence. The crown court can confirm the sentence, increase or decrease it. However, any increase can only be up to the magistrates’ maximum powers for the case.
If the defendant pleaded not guilty and was convicted, an appeal can be made against conviction and/ or sentence. The crown court, consisting of a judge sitting with two lay magistrates’ will hold a complete rehearing of the case including any evidence that was not available in the Magistrates’ court. They can confirm or vary the conviction and/or sentence or find the defendant guilty of a lesser offence.
What are Case- stated appeals?
These are appeals on a point of law that go to the Kings Bench Divisional Court, either directly from the Magistrates’ Court or following an appeal to the crown court. Both prosecution and defence can use this appeal route.
The magistrates’ or the crown court are asked to state the case by setting out their findings of fact and their decision. The appeal is made on a point of law, no witnesses are called. The appeal is usually heard by a panel of two or three judges.
The approach will be that the magistrates came to a wrong decision because they made a mistake about the law. The Divisional Court may confirm, vary or reverse the decision or send the case back for the magistrates’ to implement the decision on the law.
There is a possibility of a further appeal to the Supreme Court such as in C v DPP (1994)
Appeals from the Crown Court by the defence
If a defendant has been found guilty following a Crown Court trial, they should be advised by their lawyers on the possibility of an appeal. An appeal can be made against conviction and/ or sentence. to the Court of Appeal (criminal division)
Leave to appeal: The Criminal Appeal Act 1995 requires that the defendant must obtain leave (permission) to appeal, decided by a single judge of the Court of Appeal. The aim is to filter out cases without merit and save the courts time.
The Criminal Appeal Act 1995 simplified the grounds under the court can allow an appeal. The defendant can apply to introduce new evidence but:
-it must appear to be capable of belief and afford a ground for an appeal
-It has to be considered whether it would have been admissible at the trial and why it was not produced at that trial.
What are the Court of Appeals power’s ?
The Court of Appeal can:
-allow a defendant’s appeal and quash a conviction or
-vary the conviction to that of a lesser offence of which the defendant could have been convicted and/ or
-decrease , but NOT increase any sentence imposed
-dismiss the appeal
-order that there should be a retrial of the case in front of a new jury.
Appeals from the crown court- appeals by the prosecution against an acquittal
The prosecution has limited rights to appeal against an acquittal as follows:
- Where the acquittal was the result of the jury being nobbled. This is where one or more jurors was bribed or threatened by associates of the defendant
2.Where there is new and compelling evidence of the acquitted persons guilt and it is in the publics interest for the defendant to be retried. This power is given by the Criminal Justice Act 2003. It is known as double jeopardy, since the defendant is being tried twice for the same offence. The director of Public Prosecutions has to consent to the reopening of investigations in the case.
Appeals from Crown Court- Referring to a point of law after an acquittal
Following an acquittal, under S36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1972, the Attorney- General can refer to a point of law to the Court of Appeal in order to get a ruling on the law.
The decision by the Court of Appeal on that point of law does not affect the acquittal but it creates a precedent for any future case involving the same point of law.
Appeals from the Crown court -from prosecution against sentence after conviction
Under S36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 , the Attorney- General can apply for leave to refer an unduly lenient sentence to the Court of Appeal.
Cases are brought to the Attorney- General’s attention by the CPS. It is also possible for a member of the public to contact the Attorney-General’s office if they feel that the original sentence was too lenient.
Further appeals from the Crown Court
Both the prosecution and the defence may appeal from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court but they need to have the case certified as involving a point of law of general public importance and to get leave to appeal from either the Supreme court or the Court of Appeal
An appeal can only be made against conviction or acquittal . The appeal will consist of legal arguments only .
What are factors in sentencing?
-Judges or magistrates will weigh up any aggravating or mitigating factors before sentencing
Aggravating=increases sentence
Mitigating=will reduce the sentence
In order to do this the court must know the details of the offence .
What are the 5 main factors in sentencing?
1.pre-sentence reports
2.medical reports
3.sentencing guidelines
4.guilty plea
5.the offenders background
What are pre-sentence reports?
-Prepared by the probation service for consideration by the court
-mainly relevant for community sentences
-The report will give information about the offenders background suitability for a community sentence
-it will show why they have committed the crime and why the sentence should be positive
What are medical reports?
-Where the offender has medical or psychiatric problems the court will ask for a report to be prepared by an appropriate doctor.
-Medical factors may be important in deciding on a sentence and how to deal with the offender in an appropriate way.
- The courts have special powers when the offender is suffering from a mental illness.
Sentencing guidelines
-The sentencing council was established in 2010 to bring greater consistency and transparency to sentencing practice. It has responsibility for..
1.developing sentencing guidelines and monitoring their use
2.assesing the impact of guidelines on sentencing practice
3.publishing information about sentencing practice in the Magistrates and Crown courts.
Judges and Magistrates are under duty to impose a sentence that follows these guidelines. They should only depart from these guidelines if it will bring better justice. This will help produce more consistent sentencing.
What are some aggravating factors that would increase a sentence?
-previous convictions for offences of a similar nature
-If the offender was on bail when the offence was committed
-Any racial or religious hostility was shown in the offence
-if the offender pleaded not guilty
-group crime
-the value of goods stolen in the case of theft
-in a case of assault whether the victim was young/elderly and if it was planned in advance
Name some Mitigating factors that would reduce a sentence
-No previous convictions
-showing genuine remorse
-Taking a minor part in the offence
-mental illness or a disability
-pleading guilty