Capital Structure Flashcards
State 5 capital Structure theories
- Modigliani and Miller’s (MM) propositions. - Capital structure with tax considerations: MM’s propositions with corporate taxes. The Miller model with both corporate and personal taxes. Non-debt tax shields.
- Financial distress costs and the trade-off theory.
- Asymmetric information and the pecking order theory.
- Other views of capital structure (e.g., market timing).
What is Modiglian and miller proposition 1
The total value of a firm is equal to the market value of the total cash flows generated by its assets, and is NOT affected by its choice of capital structure.
Assumptions of MM’s Irrelevance propositions
Perfect capital markets without frictions: No taxes, transaction costs and issuance costs.
No agency problems and asymmetric information.
Investors and firms can borrow and lend at the same rate.
Financing decisions do not change the cash flows generated by investments.
No arbitrage
MM’s Proposition II
The cost of equity of a levered
firm increases in proportion to the debt-equity ratio (D/E), expressed in market value terms.
Determinants of Capital structure
Firm size, Tangibility, Profitability, Growth opportunities, Industry capital structure, Taxes, Non-debt tax shields
MM’s (1963) ‘corrected’ Proposition III
Firm value = All-equity Financed Value + PV(DITS)
VL = VU + Tc*D
Assumptions when estimating T*
Interest deductibility is limited by the availability of
positive taxable earnings.
Assumptions when estimating T*:
Investors pay capital gains taxes every year.
Certain tax rates on dividends and capital gains.
However, tax rates vary for individual investors while many
investors face no personal taxes
Which Valution method should be used :
Value a project financed with all equity
Value a project financed with constant leverage
Value a project financed with a fixed level of debt
Value a project with predetermined debt repayments
WACC
WACC
APV
APV
arbitrage in MM model
The existence of an arbitrage opportunity violates the assumption of the MM model. In perfect capital markets, such an opportunity should not exist.
Adjustments will quickly eliminate any arbitrate opportunities and achieve an equilibrium.
implications of MM’s proposition 2
Misconception: increasing the amount of debt reduces the WACC because debt has a lower cost than equity.
MM showed that “any attempt to raise the value of the firm by issuing debt will be exactly offset by the increase in the cost of capital”.
MM’s propositions do not hold in the real world, what is the importance of them
The approach that MM took to derive them. If capital structure matters, it must stem from market imperfections or frictions (e.g., taxes, agency problems, asymmetric information).
MM’s ideas marked the beginning of the modern theory of corporate finance
Summary of MM’s propositions
MM’s (1958) Propositions I and II: capital structure does NOT matter.
MM’s (1963) Proposition III: capital structure is relevant with corporate taxes.
Profitable firms should use more debt. Firms with sufficient EBIT should be 100% debt financed.
These implications are extreme.
Issues to be considered: Personal taxes, Financial distress costs, Agency costs of debt.
Direct costs of Bankruptcy
Incurred to facilitate an orderly bankruptcy process (takes 2 years)
Mainly include costly professional fees (e.g., legal and accounting fees).
Average direct bankruptcy costs represent 4-17% of the pre-bankruptcy firm market value
Costs are higher for firms with more complicated operations or large number of creditors.
Relatively higher for small firms
examples of indirect costs of financial distress
Indirect costs are incurred due to the potential:
Loss of customers, loss of suppliers, loss of employees, loss of receivables, fire sales of assets, and delayed liquidation.
briefly describe the lemons problem
At a price based on average quality, high-quality sellers
have little or no incentive to sell their goods