1.2 Cognitivism: Ethical Naturalism Flashcards
Describe the branch of meta-ethics
Primary: Meta-ethics
Secondary: Cognitivists & Non-cognitivists
- within cognitivists: ethical naturalists + institutionists
- within non-cognitivists: emotivists + prescriptivism
Define ethical naturalism
the argument that ‘good’ is a natural property in the world that can be discovered empirically
Define empiricism
the theory that all knowledge is based on sense-experience
Explain the argument of ethical naturalism
- ethical naturalism is the idea that moral truths exist & can be discovered in the same way as scientific facts - through observation and experience
- it suggests that what is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ can be understood by looking at the natural world, including human nature & society
- for example, ethical naturalists might say that kindness is good because it helps people live together peacefully, & on the other hand cruelty is bad because it causes harm
- they believe moral rules, like scientific laws, are based on real, natural facts about how people & the world work
- simply put, ethical naturalism covers morality that is based on facts about the world rather than just feelings or opinions
What is the main difference between ethical naturalism & personal opinions about right & wrong?
ethical naturalism deduces morality through the visual & physical benefits of an action whereas personal opinions are based on thinking; a sort of spiritual or intuitive sense
How can we figure out what is right or wrong using ethical naturalism? Give an example
- naturalists believe that moral conclusions can be deduced from non-moral premises i.e. one can conclude that something is wrong from observation & analysis
- in this way, if one witnesses a murder of an innocent person, the wrongness of the murder is as much a fact of the universe as the fact that stabbing the knife into the heart will stop it
Ethical naturalism: 3 strengths
- moral truths are real, not just personal opinions, & are based on facts like happiness & well-being
- morality is grounded in science & observable facts about human nature, biology, & psychology
- it argues that moral facts exist independently of individual or cultural beliefs, countering moral relativism