voting behaviour and the media Flashcards
psephology
the study of voting behaviour, elections and trends called psephology
partisan dealignment
people leaving the main two parties
what are long term influences on voter behaviour
social factors impacting voter behaviour over a number of elections e.g. class gender age religion ethnicity education
explain historical voting behaviour
Until 1970, Con & Lab averaged 91% of the vote.
By 2010, Con & Lab received only 57%.
2019 this rebounded to 76% again.
Voter Turnout
Falling since mid 20th century. 59% in 2001 but rebounded to mid/high 60’s since 2010.
Partisan dealignment since 1970’s. Falling Turnout.
long term influences on voter behaviour
Social factors that impact voter behaviour over a number of elections.
E.g. Class, Gender, Age, Religion, Ethnicity, Education
short term influences on voter behaviour
Short-term influences: Specific to particular elections.
E.g. Party Leader, Wider Context, Campaign
explain link between ethnicity and voter behaviour
Mass immigration in the 1950s meant more ethnic minorities migrated to inner cities. Fearing loss of ‘culture’, Conservative party became more antagonistic on immigration.
Smethwick (1964) Conservative Party’s infamous racist campaign. (Right)
Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood speech’
e.g. Norman Tebbit MP
Criticised South Asians (Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi for not being loyal to the country.
- Measured loyalty by support for England national cricket team
anomalies in the trends of ethnicity and voter behaviour ? (evaluation)
Ethnic Minorities are not a monolith.
Some ethnic groups are starting to move away from the labour party.
Aspire party (Tower Hamlets 2022 Local Elections) - Bangladeshi
Conservative Party (Harrow 2022 Local Elections) - (Affluent) Indian community.
Conservative Party (2017 GE) Jewish Community voted 67% tory.
explain link between regions and voter behaviour
Different geographical regions tend to have loyalties to different parties.
This can be seen through the urban/rural divide and north/south divide.
explain link between age and voter behaviour
older age ranges tend to vote more for conservatives
examples.
2019 general election- 67 percent voting conservatives
higher voter turnout with age as well- for age range of 70+, 84 percent voted
younger age range - 18 to 24 year olds, 56% voting labour
voter turnout for 18-19 year olds is 57 percent
link between religion and voter behaviour
In 2015, Labour received 74% of votes from British Muslims – in 2017, this had risen to 87%.
Jewish community turned to conservatives in 2017.
(controversy surrounding alleged anti semitism?)
link between education and voter behaviour
those with degrees and above, 43% voting labour and 29% voting tory
those with GCSE or below- 25% voting labour, 58% voting conservatives
short term factors affecting voter behaviour
Short term factors increase electoral volatility, making it harder to predict outcomes of elections
explain how rational choice theory is a short term factor on voter behaviour
Voters act like individual consumers, choosing the most suitable product on offer. Voters consider how they would be affected by having different parties in government, and make their decision based on who will benefit them and their families. Therefore, successful parties able to adapt their policies to ones that are popular with most of the electorate.
Example, Thatcher changed the conservative party’s policy for the 1979 election, as did Blair from New Labour in 1997.
Rational choice theory combines issue voting and valence (trust), which may be seen as a more accurate way of analysing voting behaviour.
how is the voter positioned in the rational choice model
Voters are rational and will vote based on whichever party benefits them the most.
Presumptions about voter. Individuals are comparable to consumers.
Rational
Largely unaligned
Use Manifestos, Party Leaders, Campaign and Past Performance to inform their decision
explain how valence is a short term factor on voter behaviour
Valence is the idea that people support the party best able to deliver on issues they care about. So, valence suggests that voters aren’t solely concerned with policies, but also on how much they trust a party to deliver those policies. This might be summed up with three questions: Which party do I trust?, Which party has been or will be most competent in government?
In 2017, many voters questioned whether the Labour Party could deliver economic prosperity, even though they liked their policies of abolishing tuition fees, re nationalising industries and giving the NHS more funding.
what is valence/ trust
Valence issues are issues where there is universal agreement on an objective.
E.g. Better health care, less crime, economic growth.
Therefore, what is important in deciding how someone votes is ‘trust’ in delivering.
example- Currently people may not trust the tories to reduce immigration as they haven’t done so in 14 years.
what is issue voting as a short term factor on voter behaviour
Voters make decisions on a range of issues by going through several stages
Issue voting is problematic as it relies on a higher level of political engagement from voters. It is also not particularly good in explaining voting patterns. For example, in 1987 and 1992, voters preferred labours policies but conservatives won the elections
explain what positional issues are in issue voting
Divisive issues that people can take different, but legitimate, views on.
Should taxes be increased?
Should welfare be cut?
Is this war justified?
Do people need to be charged for missing GP appointments?
Electorate will seek a party that matches their views.
What are Salient issues?
Salient issues are the most important issues that arise during an election.
(Economy, Healthcare, Immigration, Education, Position on Europe)
What were the salient issues at these elections?
2005, 2010, 2015, 2017, 2019
2005 - Iraq War
2010 - Economy
2015 - Immigration/European Union
2017 - Brexit and Terrorism (Manchester & London)
2019 - Brexit
Identifying Salient issues
how does one identify a salient issue
Butler & Stokes identify 4 conditions of salient issues:
Voters must be aware of an issue
Voters must have an active opinion on an issue
Voters must identify a difference between the parties policy on the issue
Voters must be motivated enough to turnout and vote for a party based on the issue.
examples of current salient issues
Cost of living, Israel-Palestine, Immigration, NHS waiting times, housing and employment.
influence of party leaders on voter behaviour
The charisma and personality of party leaders is now crucial to a party success. They are the brand of their party and are often put in good positions for photo opportunities. For example, in 1997 the young, energetic, family man Blair was seen in stark contrast to Major.
The 2010 televised debates reinforced this view when leaders tried to avoid saying anything controversial, and began to look less human. Voters started to trust them less, being unable to identify with them. Voters seemed willing to vote for an authentic character who would tell the truth in a language they understood, almost irrespective of the policies they stood for.
examples of issue voting
2019 election case study: Issue voting.
Brexit & Labour Failures in 2019
Why did Labour do poorly in the 2019 election?
Were inconsistent in their view on brexit.
Leaver voters Supported Tories ‘Get Brexit Done’
Remain voters Supported Liberal Democrats ‘Revoke article 50’
problems with issue voting
Issue voting is problematic as it relies on a higher level of political engagement from voters. It is also not particularly good in explaining voting patterns. For example, in 1987 and 1992, voters preferred Labours policies but Conservatives won the elections.
what is an electoral asset
A leader with a strong strength/charisma can attract potential voters
what is electoral liability
A boring, weird, or divisive leader can put voters off
failure of party leaders- case study, Ed Miliband
2010 to 2015
Viewed as weird, weak and unable to control ‘Blairite’ faction of his party.
Evidence:
Sun headline ‘Save Our Bacon’
During Interview W/ Jeremy Paxman, he was ridiculed for saying ‘Hell yeah, I’m tough enough’
Failure with Voters:
Loss to David Cameron in 2015 (232 Seats)
case study- Boris Johnson
Viewed as charismatic and relatable.
‘Sunny Politics’
Evidence:
London Zip-Wire Incident in 2012
‘Get Brexit Done’ - Seen as trustworthy.
Success with Voters:
Won 80 seat majority (365 seats) in 2019 GE