Topic 5 Flashcards

1
Q

Define experiment

A

Systematic research study in which investigators directly vary some factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Method of agreement

A

If X is regularly followed by Y, the X is sufficient for Y

  • X could be a cause of Y
  • if X, then Y
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Method of difference

A

Y does not occur when X does not occur
- X is necessary for Y to occur
- if not X, then not Y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Independent variable

A

The factor of interest in a study
- studying to see if it influences behaviour
- must include +2 levels for comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Field experiment

A

Research and experiments done outside of a lab in a more realistic field environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of independent variables

A

Situational - altering the environment or situation between participant groups
Task - giving participant groups different tasks
Instructional - telling participant groups to perform tasks given different instructions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Control group

A

The group of participants with no experimental treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Variables that aren’t of interest but might influence the behaviour of participants if not controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Confound

A

Any extraneous variable that results to a change in the independent variable

Effects cannot be distinguished from IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dependent variable

A

Behaviours that are measured outcomes of the experiment
- the result of the IV changing a factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ceiling vs floor effect

A

Results are all either too high or too low to determine a difference between them

Prevented by assigning moderately difficult tasks determined through previous testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Subject variables

A

Differences between groups other than the IV trying to be studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Conclusions with IV vs. SV

A

IV
- no confounds
- IV causes DV

SV
- groups differ in many ways
- IV may not cause DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Statistical conclusion validity

A

The extent to which the researcher uses statistics to properly draw appropriate conclusions from statistical analysis
- reduced by wrong analysis, violated assumptions, not reporting analyses, unreliable measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Construct validity

A

Whether a test truly measures a construct or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

External validity

A

The degree to which results can be generalized beyond the context of the experiment
- other populations
- other environments
- other times
- not a major concern with specific research
- low external validity does not mean invalid research

17
Q

Ecological validity

A

Relevance to the cognitive daily activities of people trying to adapt to their environments

18
Q

Internal validity

A

The degree to which an experiment is methodologically sound and confound free
- DV is related to the IV
- valid operational definitions

19
Q

Threats to internal validity

A
  • reduced by extraneous factors and comparison between nonequivalent groups
    -studies extending over time (pretest and posttest to reduce threat)
  • history threatens with major events between pre and posttests
  • general maturation causes behavioural changes
  • regression to the mean
  • testing (pretests effect posttest scores)
  • instrumentation

All above can be reduced with control groups

-subject selection effect (subjects choose their groups)
- attrition (participants leaving or not showing up for the second half of an experiment)