Strict Liability Flashcards
Animals
(keep separate from negligence)
A. Trespassing Animals - SL for foreseeable harm caused by animals (other than household pets).
B. Domesticated Animals- no SL, unless know of dangerous propensities
Wild Animals - SL
Abnormally Dangerous Activities: attributes and limitations
Attributes:
- Activity is incapable of being conducted except with high risk (cannot be made safe)
- If harm occurs, it is likely to be severe
- The activity must be uncommon in the community
ex. blasting, toxic chemicals, plutonium, etc.
Limitation: Harm must relate to risk.
Products Liability: Elements
Pay attention to theory, can still apply negligence or warranty to products
- Defendant must be a merchant of type of goods involved
- The product must be defective
- Defect existed when product left seller’s hand
- actual & prox cause (P made a foreseeable use of product)
- damages
Merchant, Defective, when left, P foreseeably used
Defective:
Manufacturing - one product different in dangerous way
Design - Problem to every unit, that could have been eliminated through a “reasonable alternative design”
Existed when left: if moved in ordinary channels, give P benefit of doubt
Products Liability: Defenses
Traditional Jurisdictions
Contributory negligence - careless = recovery
Assumption of Risk - knowing = no recovery
Comparative Fault - simply reduce, but won’t eliminate recovery.
Products Liability: Hints: neg products, warning, feasible alternative, foreseeable use
- When theory for products is neg, let wholesalers and retailers off the hook.
- An adequate warning usually insulates a D from SL
- If ? refers to “feasible alternative” for making product safer, I should find D liable on design defect theory. (regardless of warning)
- Foreseeable use is NOT the same as intended use. ex. use chair as ladder, is foreseeable.
- If product use is merely incidental to performance of service, no SL. (ex. P receives tainted blood from hospital)