Section 2 + Midterm Flashcards
Natural selection
How does a species change over time?
- natural selection: process of change
- main process > natural selection: occurs when individuals with certain traits are more likely than individuals with other traits to survive and reproduce and to pass on their traits to the next generation.
- natural selection : is the primary mechanism of biological change over time
According to Darwin definition of natural selection?
- natural selection is differential reproduction: some individuals have more offspring behind than others.
- it operates at level of individual.
Darwin also pointed out that natural selection occurs when 3 conditions are met.
1. Variation in traits among individuals in a species ( need diversity)
2. Heritable: this variation is heritable ( can be passed on genetically)
3. Reproductive success; relationship exist between the traits.
Stier writes;
Behavioural adaptation is sensitive to influence environment, should not be confused with misleading concepts of genetic determinism meaning that behaviour was entirely controlled and predestined by genes. Infact evolutionary theory assumes that behaviour like all other complex traits has both a genotype or genetic component and phenotype which is expression of an individual’s genotype as it affected by environmental influences.
Who survives ? Who doesn’t?
- individual who happen to have the traits/ variation( morphology and behaviour) that helps them survive.
- who doesn’t: individual who happen to have the traits/ variation( morphology and behaviour) that doesn’t helps them survive.
Explanation: the environment selects some variants over others. Natural selection predicts that traits should evolve that provide an advantage ( vs any cost) to individuals who possess the traits
Critics of evolutionary theory challenge implication that ants, baboon even human make conciliatory decision or thought calculations about how their behaviour will affect their fitness
- evolutionary theory decline such untestable assumptions about conscious intentionality underlying the fitness consequences of behaviour. Instead, They believed that strategies as patterns increase fortunes and therefore have functional or adaptive significance and not mental processing of the consequences by organism.
From stier:
No single way rule that makes a particular behaviour idea under all possible circumstances.
Fitness/ reproductive success
- individual ability to reproduce successfully compared to other members of the same species.
- low fitness= low reproductive success
-High fitness = high reproductive success
The traits that are well suited to the environment
-is an advantage for individuals survival and reproductive success
- increase frequency of the future generation ( pass on to generation)
Traits that are not suited to the environment
- is a disadvantages to individual survival and reproductive success
- decrease frequency in future generations
Natural selection and change
- natural selection operates on individual. Individual survive and reproduce or not.
- there is variation
- there is no absolute variant- depend on environments. ( environment only do the selecting)
Recap: change / evolution/ adaptation by natural selection
the differential survival and reproductive success in each parental generation ( natural selection) leads to:
- change in frequency of traits from one generation to next( change/ evolution)
- think of adaptations as having traits that meet the characteristics/challenges of your environment.
Altruism( popular definition ) and biological definition below
- popular definition of altruism: helping and selfless behavior ; opposite to selfish behaviour; recipient benefits , actor/ donor experience a cost( no benefits)
- biological definition; behaviour that potentially improves the reproductive success of the recipient, while costing the actor/donor( but there could be a potential benefit to actor/ donor.
Examples of Altruism
- predator alarm: individual calls when they see predators and attract attention to themselves( cost) to colour, the rest group benefits. Caller attracts predator and got eating.
Stier writes: such individuals that behave in altruistic ways should lose out in the fitness game to others who behave in more selfish ways to enhance their fitness. - defending a group member from a predator: an individual interven in a predator situation ( cost)
- helping another individual in a fight; an individual aggressively intervening in a fight ( cost)
Altruism and group selection
- Originally behaviour was thought to evolve because it was “ for the good of the group”. Eg predators Alarm calls is good for group but the caller make sacrifices for the group by being eating.
- This is called group selection
- Group selection : defined as acting on the group rather than individual; the group is the level of selection, not in individual.
Problem with group selection
- for group selection to work, groups with altruist would have to have higher group fitness that those without altruists.
- according to stiers: difficulties with group selection lies with its mechanisms. For group selection to work, group with altruists would have higher fitness than. Groups without altruist.
Points: group altruist was mostly rejected as an explanation for altruism.
Why altruism hard to explain
- based on natural selection, behaviour that increases the survival rate and reproductive success of the actor/ donor will be passed to higher rate of next generation.
- behaviour that decreases the survival rate and reproductive success of the actor/ donor will not passed on ( this is costly)
The problem isn’t explaining that altruism exists in primates ; but we know it does. It only explaining how it could have evolved via natural selection if it is costly to the donor?
- answer : altruism evolved by Kin ( relatives)selection not by groups selection
- kin selection is an evolutionary strategy that favours altruistic behavior towards your relatives because it ( might) result in an increase in your genetic contribution to the next generations. Kin selection is a subset of natural selection; increase your reproductive success via relatives / the success of your relatives by hamiltion.
- evolutions predicts that individuals should behave in way that not only promotes their reproduction but also that of genetic relatives
Stier write: although behaviour is by definition, an acts has actual or potential cost to an individual own fitness., “these cost may be offset by the benefits to an individual’s relatives”= which results in benefits to that individual inclusive fitness.
Inclusive fitness
- individual fitness / reproductive success + the fittnes / reproductive success of your relatives.
Even if you don’t reproduce, it’s possible the your genetic materials with our relative who reproduce is represented in next generation
Hamilton rule / formula ( equation that predicts when kin selection should occur.
- (C<BxR ) = cost Less than benefits x relativedness
- the cost (c) to the actors/ altruist individual fitness
2.benefits (b) to the recipient individual fitness ( in other words, offspring that would not have been produced without help of actor/ altruist)- The degree of relatedness( r) between the actor/ altruist and the recipient ( the proportion of genes shared by actor and recipient )
- the cost (c) to the actors/ altruist individual fitness
- altruist behaviour is predicted to occur when the cost (c) to the actor is less, than benefits (b) times relatedness (r).
Relatedness will always be a fraction except
In identical twins which is 1 to 0
R is
Coefficient of relatedness
How to calculate relatedness; you share a proportion of your genes with your relatives
- your self and twin = 1%
- you, your siblings, parents and your child = 50%
- full aunt or uncle, grandparents, full niece or nephew, grandchild = 0.25
- great grandchild, great aunt or uncle, great parents, full cousin = 0.125
Evolutionary biologists J. B. S. Haldane said
- I will lay down my life for two brothers or eight cousins 0.5 x 2=1
- it hard to measure Hamilton rules but in reality, we can use proxy of Hamilton rules and look at outcomes; we can look at positive correlation between the coefficient of relatedness between the actor and recipient and tendency to engage in helping behavior
Looking at outcome / correlation between relatedness and helping behaviour
= most altruism in primate does occur between close kin
Kin+ grooming in primates
- kin relationship makes it straightforward why individuals would groom their kin
- close kin are more credential than distance kin
- the limit to preferential treatment = degree of relatedness at which points nepotism appears to drop off = relative with an r< 0.125 tends to be treated as non- kin, not treated preferentially.
Why nepotism drop off?
According to Stier “ the related of threshold for altruism “ by stiers
1. Fail to recognize kin
2. Individual are : unlikely to benefits their inclusive fitness from any preferential kinds of treatment.
How primates recognize kin
- smells
- recognizes their relationship, close associate between infant and mother results in recognition or familiarity with kin( social experience)
Important to figure out , because Hamiltons rule will only work is altruist acts are limited to close kin.
Does altruism ever occur between non- relatives?
- Yes,
- but altruism in non kin cannot be explained by kin selection, but only can be explain by reciprocal Altruism.
Section 3: reciprocal Altruism
- Helping behaviour between non kin
- I will scratch your back if you scratch min( reciprocity between non relatives)
- Stier write; for reciprocal altruism of occur, the cost must be offset by the benefits to be gained when the recipients reciprocates with an altruistic act of his or her own.
Several condition are required for reciprocal offset:
1. Frequent interaction
2. Recognition of individual
3. Remember past interactions
4. Assisting those who provided past assistance
Point to note; when this condition are met, individuals that help others are predicted to get helps in the future. Grooming or support given to an individual will be reciprocated later.
Evidence of reciprocal altruism in primates eg old world monkeys.
- grooming go up in hierarchy ( lower ranking females groom high ranking than visa versa)
- support conflict goes down hierarchy ( higher ranking provides support for lower ranking females than vies versa)
-Points to notes: grooming for support is evidence of reciprocal altruism in primates called grooming for support models
Does helping behaviour ever occur between non- kin without evidence of reciprocal altruism?
- Yes
Thee type of behavior could evolve through mutualism
Mutualism
- Cooperation between two or more individuals where each gains a benefit/ shared advantage eg male to male completion in bonbons where one group trying to take over the other group even though one of the has to be alpha.
- mutualism is not reciprocal altruism.
- mutualism can be selfish behaviour ( there is no cost to the individual in terms of returning/ reciprocating favours.
Survival + reproduction part 2
- survival are not enough alone, but
Surval+ reproductive are the keys to understanding adaptation and evolutionary change over time.
Sexual selection
- some traits possess by individual mostly male were impossible to explain via natural selection.
Instead of aiding individuals in term of survival, these traits could be detrimental to survival which Darwin called Secondary sexual characteristics ( this traits serve no survival purpose nor the mechanical process of reproduction. He attributes this to sexual selection
What are secondary sexual characteristics?
- Traits that appears at sexual maturity ( generally in males)
- Distinction between adult males and females that go beyond basic reproductive differences.which is
- Refers as sexual dimorphism
- Primates examples : sex, size , colouration , weaponry eg teeth etc.
Sexual dimorphism in primates
Cheek phalanges in orangutans males during sexual maturity ( two morphotypes)
- they don’t have cheek pouches
- those male who do not have no phalanges are experiencing “ arrested development “ of their secondary sexual characteristics. ( eg no cheek phalanges, smaller body size than other adult males).female are reluctant ( unwilling ) to mate with these kinds of morphotypes. Thou they are matured and look like adult rather than immature.
Why another mechanism needs to explain secondary sexual characteristics?
they are not easily explained by natural selection;
- costly to produce
- sometime even detrimental to survival ( make individual more obvious to predators; i.e peacock)
Secondary sexual characteristics
- do not provide advantages for survival but for mating advantages for male.
- not evolve by natural selection
How these traits evolve if not by natural selection;
- sexual selection: predicts there is variation in the ability to compete with member of their own sex, to access mates and attracts members of the opposite sex. (competition for mates)
Review ( natural selection vs sexual selection)
- natural selection: involves survival and physical environment. How well you respond to physical environment
- sexual selection: involves reproduction and social environment ( in general, this mean that pressure in acquiring mates if you are a male or choosing mate if you are a females.
Two main mechanisms for sexual competition
- Male - male competition
- Female choices