Radiology- Questions Flashcards
J
artifact
A, H
BCDEF
no comment on caries because maybe MBE by Amalgam distal 15
Bleaching
Crown or Veneer
B 0.1
C 0.2
E0.5
D0
F0.2
Enostosis
Dense bone island
C, E F
E F G I
C D E
C H
A
C F G
C D E G
prefabricated because the post not bigger at the coronal
tooth numbering
c g
PBL = 1
caires = 0 ( should rignt angle)
52t3
PBL
RO
(caries 27: occlusal & buccal)
Alveolar atrophy
Internal resorption
Calculus?
No comment
Distal caries, defective resto , inaceptable RCT, RO, Inappropriate post
re RCT, post and core; crown lengthening; extrusion
F, G (apical resorption)
Look at 85 roots, not only caries
Pulpectomy and permanent resto
extraction
Impacted or not?
no comment
because not see the root 23
Pathologic bone loss
Ectopic Eruption
Caries
No comment, maybe artifact, not typical direction ( perpendicular to enamel surface)
RO?
No comment because 45,44 have the same
PBL?
No comment, somenthing bw 36&37 and overxeposure
apical resorption and dective resto
E
45,46 = contact haziness
47: pulp calcification?
no isthmus
because no orthers to compare isthmus, 45 wide pulp
ectopic eruption
Recurrent carries ( compared to others)
Overfilled
Apical perforation
RB4:
Recurrent caries:
C, F
A,B,H
should not comment on R. lucency ( too small)
A, D, I
no pbl or no furcation involvement
PBL: 44,45 no PBL, so risky if comment on 46D, especially on periapical radiograph.
how many resorptions?
C,D,E,F
no distal caries
no caries
64M: concavity
RCT evaluation?
Unacceptable RCT (death space)
RO
11: no apical resorption because rotation
Erupting or impacted?
impacted
because: no open apex and pulp calcification all over
enamel or composite?
only Occlusal caries
unable to know enamel or caries; no comment on defective restorations
no overthink or over mark when not clear
caries requiring restorations vs surfaces requiring restorations
C, K
Pulpotomy
No RO (pulp still vital so no apexification)
No temporary fillings, because difficult to remove
Lateral radiolucency: by trauma
C, G, K
Ectopic eruption (13 bigger than 23)
No comment on 35 impacted, too early, root not 75% formed. may be ectopic too
16 M: no contact haziness because no lucency on 15D, open contact,
maybe dentinal caries.
No other better choice than that. better than NOTA
47M= PBL
should not comment
B,L,F
small dumplings
CARIES?
PBL? resto?
PBL= 0.1
PFM = 0.2
A (28M)
, B, D
47: PBL vs colateral damage?
PBL, becasue
- upper PBL (significant. not mild)
- 2 bone levels.(distal: cortiation, lamina dura)
26:RO
Caries???
No; 6, 7 same lucency without gradient=> may be artifacts. so not comment one caires for 8 (no diffuse below line)
impacted for supernumerary tooth and 8. if 8 fully erupt, comment ectopic eruption.
cusps of 8 haziness because of soft tissue overlap
PBL?
should not comment because periapical film and only 11,12 to judge => not enough references
Pulp calcification 15???
No, pulp not recessed away from the resto.
37 caries
mesial
distal ( becaucse 38 impacted; difficult to clean bw 37,38 , no contact haziness/ overlap)
occlusal caries?
55
occlusal caries?
65
Poor contoured?
No comment, contour may be good, just overlap.
Gardner’s Syndrome
44 pulp calcification???
should not comment, others no show calcification, and pulp 44 uncelar
PBL?
yes, 2 bone levels on mesial
26 begins erupting
5-7
pC?
yes
inadequate compaction???
Dead space
External Resorption??
36 ( 2 root different lengths)