Psy 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Prelinguistic Communication

A
  • Vocalizations, crying, cooing, babbling
  • Anything before producing communicative intent
  • 8 months: gesturing is intentional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DeCasper and Spence (1986): prenatal learning

A

• Mothers-to-be who were read Dr. Seuss aloud - infants hearing the familiar story increased sucking rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Child-directed speech

A
  • “Motherese” – to get and maintain the attention of children
  • Higher in pitch, more variable, more exaggerated, concrete referents, directive utterances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Development of Communicative Intent

A

Waiting –> persistence –> development of alternative plans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fis phenomenon (Berko and Brown)

A
  • Children at 12 months can make more phonetic distinctions than they can produce
  • Reading during pregnancy: prenatal learning and retention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Categorical perception in infants

A

• Infants able to perceive phonetic differences between phonemes from ANY language : until ~12 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Werker and Tees (1984)

• Study of phonemic distinction during infancy

A

o 1 month: the developmental decline in ability to distinguish between different phonemes in all languages
o 6-8 months: highly sensitive to phonemic distinctions
o 8-10 months: considerable decline
o 10-12 months: essentially unable to perceive non-native phonemic contrasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Development of phonemic and word boundaries, Saffran et al. (1996) , Marcus et al. (1999)

A

• Saffron – evidence of statistical learning

  • infants were given string of nonsense syllables “Bidakupadotigolabubidaku” with some syllables being more likely to coincide than others
  • infants used transitional probabilities to detect statistical irregularities in syllable order in only two minutes of speech
  • Transition from /pre/ to /ty/ > /ty/ to /ba/

• Marcus: rule learning

  • infants demonstrated evidence of learning the rule (ABA vs. ABB pattern) even when training stimuli were based on different phonemes
  • applied the concept (RULE) to new sequences
  • ABA: /wo/fe/wo/
  • ABB: /wo/fe/fe/
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Statistical vs rule learning

A
  • Statistical: certain sounds more likely to occur together – infants sensitive to these probabilities
  • Rule: infants use statistical learning to form an understanding of underlying grammatical rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Babbling

A
  • 4-6 mo: infant spontaneously utters intentional but nonsense sounds (“bah” “dah” “pah”)
  • Deaf babies sign babble (!)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re-duplicated babbling

A

• 6-10 mo: same syllable repeated (“bababababa”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Variegated babbling

A

• 11-12 months: sequences of varying consonants and vowels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Idiomorphs

A

• Invented “words” that children use to refer to familiar things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fast mapping

A

• Infants are able to learn new words very quick (single exposure); rapid word acquisition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Over/Underextensions

A

• Overextensions: including too many words in word classes (anything 4-legged = dogs, all round objects = moon)

  • Context bound – specific action/situation (only say “duck” when hitting toy duck off bathtub)
  • Referential – certain subset (clock when referring to wall clock)
  • Occur in 1/3 of first 75 words

• Underextensions: using word in more restrictive way (“where’s the shoes?” – only referring to mother’s shoes)

  • Categorical – higher order category (“dada” for mother, “truck” for bus)
  • Analogical – no clear categorical relation
  • – Perceptual – “tick tok” for sound of water
  • – Functional – “hat” for basket on head
  • – Affective – “hot” for object that’s forbidden to touch
  • Less frequent / harder to detect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Holophrase

A

• Single word that’s used to express complete, meaningful thought (juice, go, food)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Syntactic growth, MLU

A
  • MLU (mean length of utterance): average number of morphemes per sentence
  • 2 year old: important to get their attention
  • Production reflects Behavior, which can be measured “relatively” easily
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Speech production stages

A

• STAGE 1: 0-2 mo.
Reflexive vocalizations, crying

• STAGE 2: 2-4 mo
Cooing (oooo, ahhhhhh)

• STAGE 3: 4-6 mo
Babbling (bah, dah, pah)
No meaning, phonetic info
Deaf infants – sign language babble

• STAGE 4: 6-10 mo
Reduplicative babbling (bababababa)

• STAGE 5: 10-14 mo
Non-reduplicative babbling (oollaaaa, bida)
Diff syllables combined
Sounds language-like

• STAGE 6: 1st birthday 
First words (Dada, mama, go)

•18 mo
15-20 words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Multiword utterances, telegraphic speech

A
  • 2 y/o

* Early speech stage in which a child speaks using mostly nouns and verbs and eliminates function words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Preferential looking and infant sucking procedures

A
  • Preferential fixation task: infants control duration of stimulus presentation by looking at the blinking light more for a novel pattern, suggesting acquisition for the repeated pattern
  • More frequent/intense sucking = recognition of novel stimulus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Overregularizations / overgeneralizations

A

• When a child applies a linguistic rule to cases that are exceptions to the rule (ex. goed and breaked)

22
Q

Assertions/requests

A

assertion: Use of an object as a means of obtaining adult attention

Requests: Use of adult as a means to an object

23
Q

Piaget’s stages of development

A

0-2 y: sensorimotor
Coordination of senses, object permanence (know an object exists even when they can’t see it)

2-7: preoperational
Symbolic thinking, proper syntax and grammar to express full concepts, imagination, conservation developed (water in 2 diff. containers)

7-11: concepts attached to concrete situations, time/space/quantity understood

11+: hypothetical/theoretical thinking, abstract logical and reasoning, concepts learned in one context and applied to others

24
Q

Representation

A

Ability to attach symbols (words) to referents/concepts

25
Q

Categorical perception is ____

A

innate

26
Q

Development of Metalinguistic awareness

A

• Ability to think about language as a system
- Language is tangible thing (words can be studied, not only communication)
- This sentence is grammatically incorrect because this word needs an “s”, etc.
• Kids asked to say a long word: “train”
- Don’t separate word from reference

27
Q

Classroom discourse

A

language that teachers and students use to communicate with each other in the classroom

28
Q

Development of narrative skills

A

total number of cohesive ties increased with age and MLU

29
Q

Cognitive consequences of bilingualism

A

• Heightened (speed up) metalinguistic awareness
- Bilingual children – slower to become fluent, but understand language as a tangible thing than monolinguals
• interference in bilingual children at phonological, syntactic, and lexical levels
• tasks requiring mental or symbolic flexibility SUPERIOR to monolinguals

30
Q

Species Specific Learning Device

A
  • not simply statistical learning – grammar type learning device
  • rule learning
31
Q

Birdsong’s relationship to human language development

A
  • “subsong” is equivalent to human babbling
  • birds in different areas learn different dialects of the same song
  • if bird is deafened after song has developed, it has no effect on motor output
  • left half of brain in bird is more involved in song (connection is IPSILATERAL)
32
Q

Critical period for Language Learning

A

The time during which language develops readily and after which (sometime between age 5 and puberty; age 12 at latest) language acquisition is much more difficult and ultimately less successful

33
Q

Genie

A

• Neglected child – isolated from 20 months – almost 14 y/o
- Extremely impoverished environment, extremely social and physical problems
- No language
• Tried to teach her language – extraordinary rate of vocab acquisition
• Problems w/ syntax (use of auxiliary verbs, passive/active transformations)

34
Q

Genie Dichotic Listening Study

A

• Demonstrated left- ear advantage (better able to understand what’s coming in from the left)
- Linguistic & non-linguistic information
- Language was lateralized in right hemisphere
• Most right-handed people: right-ear advantage (contralateral processing – language: L. hemisphere)

35
Q

Basic neuroanatomy, lobes, hemispheres, gyri, sulci

A

• 2 hemispheres: right & left
• 4 lobes
- Temporal: Perception/recognition of auditory stimuli
- Frontal: Higher thinking & lang production
- Occipital: vision
- Parietal: Least involved in language perception/production
• Corpus callosum: Bundle of nerve fibers connecting the hemispheres
• Cortex: quarter-inch membrane covering the brain; Higher cognition
• Gyri - hills
• Fissures - valleys
- Sylvian Fissure (separates temporal and frontal lobes)

36
Q

Broca’s, Wernicke’s, Arcuate Fasiculus

A

• Broca’s aphasia: impaired speech production with intact language comprehension; due to damage to Broca’s area
• Wernicke’s: impaired language comprehension with intact speech production; due to damage to Wernicke’s area
• Arcuate fasciculus: bundle of axons (white matter) that connects Wernicke’s area with Broca’s area
- Conduction aphasia: impaired ability to repeat words with intact speech production and comprehension; due to damage to arcuate fasciculus

37
Q

Auditory Cortex, Motor Cortex

A
  • Auditory: area of temporal lobe responsible for processing sound information
  • Motor: area at rear of frontal lobe controlling voluntary movements
38
Q

Neuroanatomical flow of information in word production

A
  • Wernicke’s : select word from mental lexicon
  • Arcuate fasiculus : send phonetic info to Broca’s area
  • Broca’s : interprets info from AF; sends articulatory info
  • Motor cortex : directs muscles for articulation
39
Q

(Contra) Lateralization

A
  • Specialization of function in one hemisphere of the cerebral cortex or the other
  • Contralateral control: each hemisphere of the brain controls the opposite side of
40
Q

Frontotemporal Dementia

A

• Deficits in executive functions such as planning, problem solving, and goal-directed behavior as well as recognition and comprehension of emotions in others

41
Q

Kim et al., (1997) bilingual imaging study

A

• Broca’s area in late bilingual had two separate areas of activation for each language, but in early bilinguals, the two language areas overlapped

42
Q

Alexia, agraphia

A

alexia: inability to understand written words
agraphia: inability to write

43
Q

Differentiation

A

• Number of words in a given domain in one’s lexicon

44
Q

Sapir-Whorf hypothesis

A
  • Different language shape different thought patterns
  • Whorf argued that while English has one word for snow, Eskimos have multiple
  • Unclear whether Eskimos have a more highly differentiated snow domain than English speakers
45
Q

Linguistic relativity hypotheses

A
  • Linguistic determinism (strong version): language determines the way we think - the presence of linguistic categories creates cognitive categories
  • Linguistic relativity (weak): speakers of different languages think in different ways depending on how the language shapes cognition - presence of linguistic categories influences the ease with which we perform various cognitive operations
46
Q

Color Perception

A

• Basic color terms: consist of only one morpheme (ex. blue vs. blue-green); are not contained within another color (ex. crimson vs. red); are not restricted to a small number of objects (ex. blonde = hair)
• Hierarchy of colors: black/white, red, yellow/green, blue, brown, purple/pink/orange/grey
• Color perception depends on the terms we USE TO IDENTIFY THEM:
- Kay and Kempton (1984): compared performance of English speakers and Tarahumara - Tarahumara did not clearly distinguish between blue and green (they only have a word for our blue-green)

47
Q

Grammatical Gender

A

• Boroditsky: effects of grammatical gender on physical descriptions of different nouns
• bridge = feminine in German, masculine in Spanish
Germans: used stereotypically feminine words “elegant”, “beautiful”
Spanish: used stereotypically male words “strong”, “sturdy”
• key = masculine in German, feminine in Spanish
Germans: used stereotypically masculine words “hard”, “jagged”
Spanish: used stereotypically feminine words “little”, “shiny”

48
Q

Form, Animacy, Discreteness

A

• Form: Carroll and Casagrande (1958): compared Navajo and English children on how they grouped objects together (color vs. form)
- Navajo children grouped objects on the basis of form at an earlier age than English-speaking children
• Animacy: whether the referent of the noun phrase is alive or not
• Discreteness: whether the referent is an object with definite outlines or boundaries

49
Q

Absolute terms

relative

A

absolute: Location of an object in space regardless of location of a person
relative: relationship between object in space and person

50
Q

Space and time representation

A

• English: Time as horizontal
• Mandarin: time as horizontal and vertical
• Boroditsky (2001): English vs. Mandarin speakers were faster to conclude that March comes before April with…
- Mandarin speakers: faster to respond to time question after vertical primes
- English speakers: faster to respond to time question after horizontal primes

51
Q

Counterfactual reasoning

A

• alternative possibilities – “if y has (not) happened, then x would have (not) happened”
- Easier in ENGLISH, less easily marked in Chinese
- Bloom found that Chinese speakers (in Chinese) showed poorer comprehension of counterfactual text than English speakers
- Au reported no findings
- Weird
• ability to theorize about an event that is untrue/contrary to fact

52
Q

Zipf’s law

A

• Length of a word is negatively correlated with its frequency of usage