Negligence Practice Questions Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the three key aspects of the law on negligence

A

Duty of care
Breach of duty of care
Breach of duty of care has caused damage and the damage is not too remote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which case laid down the three stage test

A

Caparo v Dickman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three stages to establish duty of care

A

Reasonable foresight
Proximity
Is it fair, just and reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What principle was established in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson

A

The neighbour principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case stated is it reasonably foreseeable that a person in the claimants position would suffer damage as a result of the defendants acts or omissions

A

Kent v griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why was the claimant not proximate in Bourhill v Young

A

She took herself to the accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the full rule stated in the case of Hill v CCWYP

A

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care. Public policy argument to avoid opening floodgates to multiple claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why were the police responsible in Robinson v WYP

A

Police not always immune from liability in negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In regard to breach of duty of care, what is the definition from Baron Anderson in Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks

A

‘failing to do something which a reasonable person would do or doing something which reasonable person would not do’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the bolam test

A

Does the conduct fall below the standard of a reasonable, competent professional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which case stated that learners will be held to the same standard as the competent person

A

Nettleship v Weston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which risk factor is supported by the case of bolton v stone

A

The degree and probability that harm will be done - the reasonable man does not take care against minute risks but does against big risks. The likelihood of injury determines if the reasonable man failed to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which case supports the rule ‘the magnitude of likely harm, courts consider not only the risk but how serious the injury could foreseeably be. The standards of a reasonable person will in certain circumstances be higher. Higher standards of care expected when the defendant knows the claimant is vulnerable’.

A

Paris v Stepney Borough Council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What rule is supported by the case of Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington HMC

A

‘But for’ the defendants breach of duty would the claimant have suffered the harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the latin for new and intervening acts

A

Novus actus interveniens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give a case example for new and intervening acts

A

Knightly v Johns or Robinson v PO

17
Q

Describe the rules on remoteness? Which case supports the rule on remoteness?

A

Only damage that is reasonably foreseeable can be claimed for Wagon Mound

18
Q

What is the exception to the rule on remoteness

A

Thin skull test: you take the claimant as you find them including anything that makes them more vulnerable and suffer more harm