Multi Choice Flashcards

1
Q
  1. Where the onus falls on the defence to prove a particular element, the standard of proof required is:
    a. on the balance of probabilities
    b. no more than to raise a doubt
    c. beyond reasonable doubt
    d. beyond a shadow of a doubt
A

a. on the balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Circumstantial evidence has been defined as:
    a. a fact always in issue that needs to be proved
    b. a fact that directly or indirectly tends to prove or disprove a fact in issue
    c. a fact that by inference can prove another fact in issue
    d. a fact that is admissible in evidence if it can be legally received by the court
A

c. a fact that by inference can prove another fact in issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Once the judge has granted an application to treat a witness as hostile, that witness may be:
  2. asked leading questions
  3. questions as to prior inconsistent statements
  4. asked any question whatsoever whether relevant to the matter under inquiry or not
  5. tested on such matters as the accuracy of his/her memory and perception
    a. 1,2,3, and 4 are correct
    b. 1,2 and 3 only are correct
    c. 1 and 2 are correct
    d. 1, 2 and 4 only are correct
A

d. 1, 2 and 4 only are correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. What is the meaning of veracity?
    a. a tendency to act in a particular way
    b. a disposition to refrain from lying
    c. the ability to record a statement accurately
    d. a tendency to exaggerate facts
A

b. a disposition to refrain from lying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. The general purpose of the examination-in-chief is to:
    a. Weaken, qualify or destroy the opponents case
    b. Elicit testimony that supports the case of the party calling that witness
    c. Elicit new facts arising out of the cross-examination of the defence witnesses
    d. Establish the prosecution case through the defence witnesses
A

b. Elicit testimony that supports the case of the party calling that witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Corroboration of a complainants statement is not necessary in a criminal proceeding except for the following offence:
    a. sexual violation by rape
    b. false oaths
    c. blackmail
    d. deception
A

b. false oaths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. A witness is eligible to give evidence if:
    a. they can be required to give evidence against their will for the prosecution
    b. they are not married to the defendant
    c. they are lawfully able to give evidence on behalf of both prosecution and defence
    d. they can be required to give evidence against their will for the defence
A

c. they are lawfully able to give evidence on behalf of both prosecution and defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Which is not an example where judicial notice can be taken?
    a. the date of birth of a complainant under 16
    b. Unknown
    c. Unknown
    d. Unknown
A

a. the date of birth of a complainant under 16

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. An oath and affirmation may be taken by:
    a. all witnesses involved in a proceeding
    b. only witness under 65 years of age involved in a proceeding
    c. any witness 16 years and over involved in a proceeding
    d. any witness 12 years and over involved in a proceeding
A

d. any witness 12 years and over involved in a proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Where an expert is called to give specialised evidence:
    a. the judge may take judicial notice of the experts qualifications
    b. the judge may take judicial notice of the experts qualifications only where the witness has appeared before them previously
    c. the expert must demonstrate to the court that he/she has the qualifications to be deemed an expert
    d. the expert must prove that he/she acquired their specialised knowledge professionally
A

c. the expert must demonstrate to the court that he/she has the qualifications to be deemed an expert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Before giving evidence in court, witnesses may refresh their memory from:
    a. Their original statement
    b. Their deposition
    c. Either of the above
    d. None of the above
A

c. Either of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Which of these statements is correct regarding the eligibility and compellability of a witness in a proceeding?
    a. Any person who is eligible to give evidence is compellable
    b. a married person whilst eligible is not compelled to give evidence against their spouse
    c. any person who is eligible may not be compellable
    d. a 12 year old child is eligible but not compellable to give evidence in a proceeding
A

a. Any person who is eligible to give evidence is compellable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. A person is unavailable as a witness when:
    a. The person is overseas and can’t be contacted
    b. The person was not at work when the police went to pick the person up
    c. The phone number used to contact the person is no longer in service
    d. The person refuses to go to court
A

a. The person is overseas and can’t be contacted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. A presumption of law:
    a. Is always rebuttable
    b. May be rebuttable or irrebuttable
    c. Is always rebuttable or irrebuttable
    d. May be subject to judicial notice
A

b. May be rebuttable or irrebuttable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. When giving evidence in court, you should address the judge as:
    a. Your worship
    b. Using the judges title and surname, e.g. Judge Smith
    c. Your honour or Sir/Ma’am
    d. Your worship or Sir/Ma’am
A

c. Your honour or Sir/Ma’am

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. The Court has a discretion to include propensity evidence against a defendant, if:
    a. The prejudicial effect of the evidence outweighs its probative value
    b. It shows that the accused is of a criminal disposition and so more likely to have committed the crime
    c. It will dispose the jury against the accused
    d. The probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect
A

d. The probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect

17
Q
  1. In relation to privilege of medical practitioners, “protected communication” refers to communication made by the patient to the doctor for him/her to examine, treat or act for the patient:
  2. Who is suffering for a drug dependency
  3. Who has any other condition or behaviour that manifests itself in criminal conduct
  4. Who has provided information concerning their family
  5. Who is suffering from a mental illness
    a. 1 only is correct
    b. 2 and 3 are correct
    c. 3 and 4 are correct
    d. 1 and 2 are correct
A

d. 1 and 2 are correct

18
Q
  1. A witness is deemed to be hostile when:
    a. They give different evidence from what is expected
    b. Refuses to answer questions or deliberately withholds information
    c. They are an “unfavourable witness” to the party calling them
    d. The prosecution provides grounds for disbelieving the witnesses current testimony
A

b. Refuses to answer questions or deliberately withholds information

19
Q
  1. It is not necessary in court to prove “uncontroverted facts.” These are admitted as:
    a. Judicial notice
    b. Presumptions of fact
    c. Admissions for the purpose of trial
    d. Presumptions of law
A

a. Judicial notice

20
Q
  1. Section 25 of the Evidence Act 2006 governs the admissibility of expert evidence. If the evidence lead is opinion evidence, then in order to comply with the section 25 the opinion must…
    a. Be that of an “expert”
    b. Comprise “expert evidence”
    c. Offer substantial help to the fact-finder in understanding other evidence of ascertaining any fact in the proceeding
    d. All of the above
A

d. All of the above

21
Q
  1. The court has discretion to include propensity evidence against a defendant, if:
    a. The prejudicial effect of the evidence outweighs its probative value
    b. It shows that the accused is of a criminal disposition and so more likely to have committed the crime
    c. It will dispose the jury against the accused
    d. The probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect
A

d. The probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect

22
Q
  1. Circumstantial evidence has been defined as:
    a. A fact always in issue that needs to be proved
    b. A fact that by inference can prove another fact in issue
    c. A fact that directly tends to prove or disprove a fact in issue
    d. A fact that is admissible in evidence if it can be legally received by the court
A

b. A fact that by inference can prove another fact in issue

23
Q
  1. A person is unavailable as a witness when:
    a. The person is overseas and can’t be contacted
    b. The person was not at work when the police went to pick the person up
    c. The phone number used to contact the person is no longer in service
    d. The person refuses to go to court
A

a. The person is overseas and can’t be contacted

24
Q
  1. Before giving evidence in court, witnesses may refresh their memory from:
    a. Their original statement
    b. Their deposition
    c. Either of the above
    d. None of the above
A

c. Either of the above

25
Q
  1. A presumption of fact is:
    a. Always rebuttable
    b. May be rebuttable or irrebuttable
    c. Always irrebuttable
    d. May be subject to judicial notice
A

a. Always rebuttable

26
Q
  1. Before giving evidence:
    e. The prejudicial effect of the evidence outweighs its probative value
    f. It shows that the accused is of a criminal disposition and so more likely to have committed the crime
    g. It will dispose the jury against the accused
    h. The probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect
A

h. The probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect

27
Q
  1. The general purpose of the examination-in-chief is to:
    a. Weaken, qualify or destroy the opponents case
    b. Elicit testimony that supports the case of the party calling that witness
    c. Elicit new facts arising out of the cross-examination of the defence witnesses
    d. Establish the prosecution case through the defence witnesses
A

b. Elicit testimony that supports the case of the party calling that witness

28
Q
  1. What is the general rule in relation to ‘establishing facts?’
    a. All facts in issue must be proved by evidence
    b. All facts relevant to the issue must be proved
    c. All facts in issue and facts relevant to the issue must be proved by evidence
    d. All facts in issue and facts that are formally admitted must be proved by the court
A

c. All facts in issue and facts relevant to the issue must be proved by evidence

29
Q
  1. It is not necessary in court to prove facts such as ‘the season of summer in New Zealand is over the period of December to February”, these facts are admitted as:
    a. Presumptions of fact
    b. Admissions for the purpose of trial
    c. Presumptions of law
    d. Judicial notice
A

d. Judicial notice

30
Q
  1. A witness is eligible to give evidence if…
    a. They can be required to give evidence against their will for the prosecution
    b. They are not married to the defendant
    c. They are lawfully able to give evidence on behalf of both prosecution and defence
    d. They can be required to give evidence against their will for the defence.
A

c. They are lawfully able to give evidence on behalf of both prosecution and defence

31
Q
A
32
Q
A