module 8 Flashcards
ethnicity vs race
• While many people use the term ethnicity and race interchangeably, ethnicity actually refers to cultural characteristics
race refers to biological characteristics
describe ethnicity
Ethnicityrefers to cultural differences in food, language, clothing practices, religion, marriage practices, and other traditions.
describe objective ethnicity
• Objective ethnicityis your ancestral lineage (that is, where your parents and grandparents are from).
describe subjective ethnicity
• Subjective ethnicityis how you choose to identify. For example, a person with mixed ethnic ancestry might feel closer and more familiar to the one aspect of their heritage and want to highlight that part of their heritage over others.
describe race
- racerefers to biological differences between racial groups commonly distinguished by skin colour, eye colour and shape, hair colour and texture. While racial differences exist, the meanings these differences come to take on in any given cultural context are social
- “race is a culturally constructed category used to classify humankind”
describe the racialization of aboriginals and define the term
Prior to North American colonization, Aboriginal peoples did not consider themselves part of the same racial (or ethnic) group. . It was only after European colonization that North American Indigenous groups come to be understood as a homogenous group. In fact, many of the common assumptions we have about race are false.
In order to highlight the socially constructed nature of race classifications and categories, the term racialization has recently been introduced.Racializationis the process through which race and racial differences get attributed to a population
racialization deeper meaning
• The concept of racialization moves the category of race from a static, biological-based idea to one that is actively shaped in and through social relations. So, while we can’t ignore biological differences about race, we also can’t overlook the ways in which racial and racialized meanings come to exist. Importantly, if processes of racialization aren’t static, then they are also open to change. The systemic and structural racial hierarchies we see today (unequal distribution of wealth, power, and prestige across racial lines) can be understood through the historical racialization of racial groups, which we will examine in the next section.
describe linneaus’ view on race
18th century
- Carl Linneaus (1707–1778), a Swedish botanist, physician, and zoologist, was considered the father of modern taxonomy. Taxonomy is a system of naming, classification, and categorization that emerged alongside the Enlightenment in an attempt to classify the natural world (Graves, 2002).
- Linneaus categorized humans into four separate species: Europaeus (Europeans), Asiaticus (Asians), Americanus (North American Aboriginals), and Afer (Africans). He not only problematically placed these groups on a hierarchy with Europeans slotted in the highest rank (he himself a European), but he also aligned whole groups of people with Hippocrates’s classification of personality temperaments.
- For Linneaus, Europeans were considered sanguine (meaning passionate), Asians were considered melancholic (meaning sad), Aboriginals were considered choleric (meaning angry), and Africans were considered bilious (meaning lazy). From today’s standards, we see this classification system as inherently racist, but at the time it circulated as “scientific knowledge” and served to justify many early forms of genocide and slavery.
define genocide and canada’s example
Genocideis “the deliberate, systematic killing of an entire people or nation” (Kendall, Nygaard, & Thompson, 2004) and can be seen in the history of Canada through the treatment of Indigenous populations. Slavery was actively practiced in Canada until 1834 when the British Parliament abolished slavery in all its colonies, but it continues to exist—albeit covertly—through practices of migrant labour (Cooper, 2013). Early racial classifications systems like Linneaus’ can be understood as an example ofscientific racism—the use of the scientific method to justify racial hierarchy (Blatt, 2007).
who extended linneaus’ work?
• Extending the work of Carl Linneaus was Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840), a German physiologist who argued that there were five separate races: Caucasians (whom he called the white race), Mongolians (whom he called the yellow race), Malayans (whom he called the brown race), Ethiopians (whom he called the black race), American Indians (whom he called the red race).
Blumenbach’s early work usedcraniometry—the measurement of skull sizes and shapes—to determine racial differences of intelligence (Graves, 2002). From a sociological perspective, his work is not only another example of scientific racism but also an example ofbiological determinism
what is biological determinism?
the assumption that human differences reside in the body (Blatt, 2007). Biological determinisms are dangerous because they fail to take into account social and environmental differences for the causes of racial difference (for example, access to education and literacy).
describe darwin’s view on race. 19th century
harles Darwin (1809–1882) was an English naturalist known for the theory of evolution—the idea that all human organisms on earth share common ancestry (Barkan, 1996). Unlike earlier theories of racial classification, Darwin was amonogenist, upholding the theory that all humans evolved from a single ancestry and that any racial differences were superficial. • He contended that racial differences did exist, but these differences were the result of environmental factors like geography (i.e., amount of exposure to the sun) and diet (i.e., availability of food in particular geographic regions). His theory of evolution explains why northern populations (where there is less exposure to the sun) are fairer skinned and why southern populations (where there is more exposure to the sun) are darker skinned. So, while Darwin moves away from the dangerous biological determinisms seen in earlier racial classifications, he unfortunately supported the scientific racist assumptions that white populations had evolved to a more “civilized” version of the human species, while racialized populations were relegated as “primitive” (once again serving to justify slavery and genocide). While Darwin certainly did not invent racism, parts of his theory of evolution fostered it (Graves, 2002).
what did UNESCO urge people to think about racism? 20th/21st century
After much question on the differences between human races, and the many atrocities that followed the 18th- and 19th-century practices of slavery, colonialism, and genocide, in 1950 the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) made a global public declaration rejecting any scientific basis for theories of racial hierarchy. Morally condemning both racism and racist practices, UNESCO urged people to move towards acolour-blind approach
what is the color blind approach? why is it wrong?
• At face value, this may have seemed like a good strategy to end racial discrimination, but in reality, colour-blindness actually functioned to further mask racial and ethnic inequalities by effectively turning a blind eye to the experiences of racism and racial discrimination. While effective in moving beyond biological determinisms of race, colour-blindness cannot account for the fact that many people of colour still experience racial and ethnic discrimination.
who fought against the color blind theory?
• Franz Fanon was one of the key scholars and activists working against the colour-blind approach. In his important book Black Skin, White Masks (1952/2008), he draws careful attention to the racism and dehumanization inherent in situations of colonial domination, like the one he was living in the United States.
1960’s race
• Critical race theorists of the 1960s offer an important critique of the colour-blind approach by speaking to people’s experiences of racial oppression. At that time in North America much of society was racesegregated. As your text explains, African-Americans and Canadians (as well as Aboriginal groups) were barred from many “white” public places, including res taurants, schools, buses, country clubs, and sports leagues (Symbaluk & Bereska, 2016, p. 181). Moreover, in both Canada and the United States, interracial marriages were banned, andpopulation transferswere actively practiced—“a process whereby minority groups are forcibly expelled or are limited to a specific [geographical] location” (Symbaluk & Bereska, 181)
Why do we see racial quarters of the city?
Part of the reason we see racial and ethnic quarters of the city (e.g., Chinatowns in many Canadian cities or Africville outside of Halifax) is because historically, racial and ethnic minority groups were barred from white spaces (often the centre areas of the city) and therefore created their own areas for living, commerce, and socializing.