league of nations and international peace Flashcards
who were the members of the league of nations?
britain, france,italy, japan
america was missing because the senate believed in isolationism.
russia wasn’t allowed to join because the lon(league of nations) was scared of communism.
germany left once hitler came into power
what were the league’s aims?
to stop war from breaking out again
to encourage disarmament
to improve working conditions
to tackle deadly diseases
what was the covenant?
set up what the league was and what members could expect to happen under it and dealt with aggression.
how did the league plan to keep peace?
collective security and international laws
what was collective security?
collective security was the idea that if all countries worked together they could make sure peace was kept and that the interests of other nations were looked after
what was the role of the usa?
senate refused to agree, Wilson tried to convince people that it was good idea, however American shad seen a lot of young americans die so they wanted to isolate themselves.
how did the league deal with aggression?
mitigation(talking it out) moral condemnation(telling off) economic sanctions(not trading with that country)
what were britain’s and france’s thoughts on the league?
at the paris peace conference,lloyd George was very critical however he then issued the fountainbleau memorandum
it helped final peace treaties and allowed germany’s colonies to be given away as mandates
lon would run countries until they were able to be independent, more colonies for the british empire
france was happy to be protected from invasion
america should’ve been allowed to join lon-reasons to agree
yes because Woodrow Wilson had the idea to bring the world together for peace and prevent future war
they would’ve had better trade deals with other countries
america was also the most powerful country at the time ,so could’ve been used to threaten countries during small disputes
america should’ve been allowed to join the lon-reasons to disagree
they wanted to stay out of future wars and disputes, americans were appalled by the carnage of ww1
they believed in freedom and opposed colonies and empires, didn’t want to add to britain and france’s empires
what was the council?
42 countries met once a year and wasn’t enough to ensure the league ran smoothly
too large to act in an emergency
4 permanent members
what was the assembly?
international parliament unanimous vote(what was the assembly in charge of)
what was the assembly in charge of?
the assembly was in charge of the elections to permanent court of justice
voting for non-permanent members of the council
deciding how the league’s money was spent
what was the permanent court of justice?
court of law which would settle international arguments
11 judges, 4 deputy judges
hard to get countries to follow advice, no army to force people to do things they wanted
the court was elected by the assembly and council
judges were prominent for 11 years
what was the secrectarient?
it was a civil service in charge of administration and organising any action that the league wanted to take
body of experts from different areas eg finance
responsible for carrying out any decisions taken bythe league,except for military issues
what was special commissions?
special groups put together to tackle issues that the league was worried about
helped underdeveloped countries with economic issues
supported underrepresented or minority groups such as women and supervised the mandates
aims of the league-mnemonic
D-disarmament(discourage aggression)
I-improve peoples lives and working conditions
E-encourage cooperation and trade
S-stop war (collective security)
what were the strengths of league of nations?
written into all the peace treaties, so all nations who signed recognised the organisation
vast membership
so many members that economic sanctions were daunting for small countries
what were the weaknesses of the league of nations?
many important countries didn’t or wouldn’t join the league, which undermined it as a ‘global’ organisation it meant that if a country got a sanction, they could trade with countries that weren’t part of the league eg america
league had no army so they couldn’t force people to take their advice
structure was very complicated, confused others and slowed action
decision making was unanimous, so it was slow
what were the border disputes?
vilna 1920(failure)[austria and lithuania]
upper silesia 1921(success)[poland and germany]
aaland islands 1921 (success)[sweden and finland]
corfu 1923(failure)[greece and albania]
bulgaria 1925(success)[greece and bulgaria]
the great depression 1929(failure)[worldwide]
what was the problem in the vilna border dispute in 1920?
austria-hungary empire given independence
poland and lithuania were created
people in vilna(lithuania’s capital) wanted to be polish
polish army took control of vilna
lithuania asked lon for help
what did the lon do about the vilna border dispute in 1921?
france needed poland as ally to help, and poland ultimately didn’t want to give it’s support
britain didn’t wanted to send troops without support from france
poland consequently took vilna
what was the problem in the upper silesia border dispute in 1921?
poland and germany both wanted it as there was iron and steel production
germany has 60% of votes to get upper silesia during the plebiscite , however poland said that people who voted lived in upper silesia
poles were sad because they lost half of their population and a third of its land.
500,000 poles were in german territory
germany was upset because they lost three quest terms if their coal which meant they lost income as well
coal agreement ended in 1923, and this worsened the conflict between germany and poland
what did the lon do about the upper silesia border dispute in 1921?
they conducted a plebiscite(a vote) and britain and france sent their troops to authorise it
plot upper silesia into regions depending on how people voted,so poland had the industry and germany got rural areas
outcome accepted by both parties and ensured that everything was in the right place
what was the problem in the aaland island border dispute in 1921?
sweden and finland both wanted the aaland islands and claimed it
both threatened war on each other
what did the lon do about the aaland island border dispute in 1921?
they investigated both country’s claim
island was to be finland’s however finland was not allowed to build forts, so they didn’t have a base to threaten or attack sweden
successfully avoided war
what was the problem about the corfu border dispute in 1923?
mussolini(italian dictator) found a tellini(one of his detectives) had been mrudered in corfu
he blamed the greece government and demanded compensation
invaded and occupied corfu, killed 15 people
greece appealed to lon who condemned mussolini as he acted with aggression, he agreed that greece should pay compensation