JCP Jan-March 2022 Flashcards

1
Q

Demarco et al. 2021

A

NCCLs and Associated Factors - cohort study in Brazil (multilevel analysis)

900 selected for analys

oral health studies followed thousands of people

Associated: Male sex, smoking, frequent tooth brushing, recession present
Lower prevelence if: presence of perio pocket
Highly assiciated with: Recession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Iwasaki et al. 2021

A

Sleep Duration and Severe Perio in Mid-aged Jap Workers

1130 workers (ave age 43)
Oral health exam and Questionaire

Sleep duration on work/off days
number of work/off days/week
12 dentists blinded to questionaire did exam

Shorter Sleep associated with: Advanced age, Current smoking, Later sleep onset time

Sleep <5hrs/day = OR 2.76 vs 7-7.9hrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bertl (Stavrapolous) et al. 2021

A

Impact of Successfully Treated Perio patient status on patient related outome perameters during long term supportive care

Stage III or IV - Mod-high adherence for 7.5yrs at least - 100pts selected
Stage/graded at baseline
Stability diagnosed according to Chappel
Diseased teeth = 4mmPD all around tooth
Check for: Diseased teeth/patient - TLDP - TLDanything else
Initial exam:
Periodontal Risk Assessment (low/mod/high) significantly higher in aherent group! (23/70/7 vs 20/43/0)
More unstable in highly adherent (21 vs 9)
Final Exam:
Only 20% patients stable
Factors associated with increased risk for TLDP and more diseased teeth: More initial diseased teeth, unstable initial status, poor oral hygiene
Tooth loss due to any other reason was 3x more common than TLDP
High compliance mitigated effect of non-stable initial diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Anoixiadou et al. 2021

A

EMD in non-surgical GTR - randomized clinical trial

Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Technique (MINST)

double blinded
G1: MINST + EMD (18pts)
G2: MINST (18pts)
6 and 12mo outcomes

NSSD in clinical and radiographic outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Eeckhout (Cosyn) et al. 2022

A

RCT for Hyaluronic Acid Gel in Socket Preservation

Changes in wound dimension over time

Inclusion: ARP site has at least 1 tooth adj., No molars, >50% buccal bone
DBBM + Collagen Matrix
Control 20pts 23 sites
Test 18pts 23 sites
0.8% HA applied to Collagen Matrix 3x/day for 7days
Wound dimension (Immediate/1wk/3wks)
Bone dimension (4mo)

NSSD between wound healing dimenstions
NSSD in pain/bleeding/edema
SSD - MORE horizontal boneloss in Test group!!!
(1.92 vs 3.55)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blonco, Pico et al.

A

Adjunctive benefit of systemic metronidazole on non-surgical treatment of Pi (randomized placebo-controlled trial)

32pt 64i
Clinical, radiographic and microbiological at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months at six sites per implant
500mg TID 7days
Berglundh 2018 diag (no records)

Results w/ SSD: t vs c
PPD Red: 2.53 vs 1.02
CAL Gain: 2.14 vs 0.53
RBGain: 2.33 vs 1.33
Succss: 56% vs 25%

Significantly greater decrease in Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Campylobacter rectus counts compared with the control group (p value <.05).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Philip et al. 2021

A

Microbiome of Dental and Peri-implant subgingival plaque during mucositis treatment: RCT

debridement in conjunction wi

Results
Mucositis sites have less complex and less anaerobic biofilms
Antimicrobial mouth rinse + debridement effects dental AND periimplant biofilms (less dysbiotic) - does not translate clinically
Dental and Periimplant environments are distinct and require different treatment approaches

Aim
Assess the microbial effects of mechanical
debridement in conjunction with use of
mouthrinse on sites with peri-implant mucositis
and gingivitis

Methods
89pts
Pts with mucostits (4+mm + BOP) and gingivitis
SupraG debridement + mouthrinse:
0.2% Delmopinol
0.2% CHX
Placebo
Submucosal/SubG Biofilm samples at baseline, 1mo, 3mo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Silva (Hammerle) et al. 2021

A

Periimplant tissue change at ARP sites with DBBM vs DBBM + Col: 22mo follow up

Results
Rec: NSSD
MT: From T0-T1: DBBM Sig better at 3 and 5mm below margin (0.5mm differences)
MT: From T1-T2: NSSD
NSSD: MBL

Methods
RCT (54/66pts followed up)
Silicone impressions
EXT + ARP w/ DBBM vs DBBM-c
T0: Before extraction
T1: 2wks after crown placement
T2: 1yr after crown placement
Midfacial recession
Mucosal thickness (MT): assessed at 1mm, 3mm, and 5mm below
MBL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly