Impeachment Flashcards

1
Q

When can you bolster witness credibility?

A

-Credibility was attacked
-In a sexual assault case, evidence that P made a timely complaint
-Prior identification: identifying D as perpetrator (allowed to bolster AND as substantive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Methods of impeachment

A

Prior inconsistent statements, bias or interest, criminal convictions, bad acts, opinion, or reputation regarding untruthfulness, sensory deficiencies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Impeachment by prior inconsistent statements

A

-Via cross OR extrinsic evidence
-Extrinsic evidence needs:
–witness opportunity to explain or deny
–adverse party opportunity to examine the witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

No foundation needed for prior inconsistent statement IF

A

-Prior inconsistent made by opposing party
-Hearsay declarant is being impeached
-Justice requires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Extrinsic evidence of bias?

A

Yes BUT I need to first ask about the bias facts on cross examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sensory deficiencies–when and how?

A

-Cross
-Extrinsic evidence
-No foundation needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contradiction extrinsic evidence?

A

Yes UNLESS insignificant fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Method of proving untruthfulness?

A

-Character or opinion witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Prior convictions permissible IF

A

-No foundation needed
-The court must admit crimes involving dishonesty or false statement
-The court may exclude crimes not involving dishonesty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Inadmissible prior convictions

A

-Crim D prior convictions UNLESS probative value outweighs prejudicial effect (favors exclusion)
-Other witnesses: 403 analysis (favors inclusion)
-10+yrs after release UNLESS probative value substantially outweighs prejudicial effect
-Pardoned based on rehabilitation
-Juvenile conviction
-Constitutionally defective conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rehabilitations Methods

A

-can only rehabilitate the attacked trait
-explanation on redirect
-truthfulness character evidence
-Prior consistent statement IF witness attacked for truthfulness due to motive and statement predates motive OR witness impeached for non-character reason, like memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly