Immunology 5: Immune evasion Flashcards
Why are pathogens able to evade the immune system
The host environment is predictable
Strategy overview
Speed: in and out before adaptive immunity is effective.
Inhibition: producing molecules that interfere with immune pathways
Avoid detection (innate or adaptive)
Change rapidly: keeping one step ahead of the response
Smoke-screen effects
-> Induce huge responses against non-protective antigens
Stimulate the “wrong type” of response.
Speed
In, replicate + out before adaptive immunity is effective (quick hit)
- Eg. Influenza, Salmonella -> mucosal surface infections where rapid transmission is favoured
Inhibition with immune pathways
Viruses:
- Decoy receptors that bind/ block cytokine activity (e.g. Poxviruses contain a viral IL18 binding protein)
- Inhibitors of antigen presentation pathways (e.g. Down reg MHC transcription, Inhibit proteases that chop up virus)
- > BUT NK detect reduction in MHC so some viruses use CMV to mimic
- Inhibors of apoptosis
- interferance with signalling pathway (e.g. degrade adaptor proteins in TLR signalling)
Example: HIV
- targets CD4+ T cells first which are cells which would recognise and control it
- Downregulates MHC-1 complex
- frequenct antigenic drift due to low fidelity reverse transcriptase
- Hides within cells
- CD4 reduction leads to CD8 reduction
- Eventually leads to AIDs
Bacteria and parasites:
- proteases digest antibodies stuck to surface
- complement components degraded by proteases (e.g Pseudomonas aeruginosa- Produces elastase that inactivates C3b and C5a )
- coagulation cascades disrupted – proteases break up clots so pathogen can move
- antibody binding molecules eg. protein A
- slippery capsule of bacteria to prevent phagocytosis
- Escape from phagosome into cytoplasm (e.g. listeria monocytogenes -> hijack host cytoskeleton to drive bacteria forward in projection to adjacent cell)
- Block phagosome-lysosome fusion (e.g. M.tuberculosis which also avoids acidic phagosome environment)
Avoid detection
hide somewhere w/ low response or disguise yourself
Induce tolerance by deleting cells
- > e.g. being present in the thymus during T cell developement (gap in T cell repetoir)
- > e.g. using super antigen to delete family of T cells (Murine Mammary Tumour Virus)
Replicate away from immune activity
-> In brain eg. Toxoplasma gondii
-> In outer keratinised skin eg. Papilloma virus
-> Intracellular – away from antibodies
-> In red blood cells w/ no MHC pathways eg. Plasmodium
Coat surface w/ host or mimic host proteins
- > e.g. lipooligosaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni mimics the human GM1 ganglioside
Obscure coat
- > e.g. carbohydrate capsules to mask antigens (pneumococcus)
-> But key molecules like flagella cannot be covered
Latency
- > Herpes virus spreads to sensory neurone to persist inlatent state (low MHC levels)
Change in the face of immune attack
Change antigens to escape antibodies and T cells
1) Multiple serotypes circulating at once so harder for host to adapt
Example: 84 known serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae)
2) host dynamically change during infection
Chance:
-> Antigenic drift (mutation)
-> antigenic shift (reassortment of segments)
Example: Influenza
Programmed:
- programmed rearrangements of the pathogen DNA
Example: African Trypanosomes
- 1000 Variable Surface Glycoproteins VSGs
- sequentially expressed via rearrangement into expression sites
Smoke screen effect
Induce strong response against non-protective epitopes / antigens so the immune system is less effective against actual antigen
Can involve super antigens to proliferate the non-effective response
- Super antigens cross link the MHC with the TCR creating huge proliferation of T cells, limiting the amount of response possible against the pathogen.
Example: Toxic shock syndrome
- releases toxin-1 which acts as a superantigen leading to T cell proliferation and death
Stimulate wrong response
Pathogens can stimualte the wrong response (e.g produce mimicing chemokines, cytokines)
Example: Trichuris nematode
- make IFNγ mimics that drive Th1 response which is ineffective against them and inhbits the Th2 response required
Cross host effects
Immune evasion can be harder when the pathogen has many hosts with different immune systems
Example: SARS coronavirus hypothesis
- coronaviruses evolved to interfere w/ type I IFN responses
- Some bats:
o High basal IFN responses
o Low inflammation from PPRR activation
o Less intense adaptive responses
- Human have:
o Lower basal IFN system
o Higher inflammation
- Virus easily combats early IFN response as it is low compared to bats, and can lead to uncrolled inflamation -> get severe immunopathology