Federalism foundations and legislative power Flashcards
Legislative & Executive Powers Early Foundations
- Executive has power to remove officials – implicit power
- Congress creates First Bank (McCulloch v. Maryland)
* can use Necessary and Proper Clause with other expressed powers to make law
* Constitution is blueprint, not the full extent of national governmental powers
* Establishes Ends / Means Test (Modern Necessary & Proper Clause)
Identify expressed Congressional power - Necessary if: Adapted to the end AND Useful to achieving that end
- Proper if:
a. Not prohibited by Constitution
b. Within letter and spirit of the Constitution
i. Does NOT create unlimited power in Congress - Supremacy Clause –
- Establishes federal law supreme over the States (preemption)
- States power cannot burden or impede explicit Congressional power
Mcculloch v. Maryland ends/ means test for N& P clause
No power listed to charter corp. or bank, but:
lay and collect taxes
borrow money
regulate commerce
declare and conduct war
raise and support armies
Means
adapted
not prohibited
within letter & spirt of Const
End
Legitimate & w/in Constitution
Identify legitimate constitutional end–power granted by Const.
Necessary–adapted to the end; useful to achieving that end
Proper–not prohibited by the Constitution
–within letter & spirt of Const.
Federalism Foundations
Constitutional Text / Structure
* Horizontal separation b/t legislative, judicial and
Executive
* Vertically b/t Federal government and the states
Separation of Powers
* Federal Government
o Structural – Article I (Congress), Article II (Executive), Article
III (Judicial)
o Not explicit in Constitution
* Federal Govt. and States
o 10th Amendment
Congress’ Expressed Powers
(Art. I, Section 8)
1.Taxing Power
2.Spending Power
3.Borrow money
4.Regulate commerce among the states, w/ foreign nations and with
Indian tribes
5.Establish regulations governing naturalization and bankruptcy
6.Coin and regulate currency
7.Establish post offices and roads
8.Grant patents and copyrights
9.Create lower federal courts
10.Declare war and support army, navy and militia
11.Govern D.C. and all federal conclaves and establishments
12.Make all laws necessary and proper ….
Executive Powers – Expressed
(Article II)
1.Vests Executive power in President
2.Role as commander in chief
3.Power to grant pardons
4.Power to make treaties
5.Appoint officials
6.Fill Vacancies
7.Recommend legislation deemed necessary and
expedient
8.Take Care Laws be Faithfully Executed
Judicial Power– Expressed (Article
III) / Branch Checks & Balances)
Separation of Powers creates checks and balances on other two
branches of federal government
Passing legislation
1. Concurrence of both houses of Congress AND either:
a. Approval or President OR
b. Super majority of Congress to override veto (2/3)
2. Treaties
1. Negotiated by President
2. Advice and consent of 2/3 of Senate
3. Law
3. Executive enforces
4. Judicial resolves law disputes
Commerce Power - Early
Foundations
- Commerce includes:
- Traffic between nations
- Buying and selling goods
- Interchange of commodities
- Navigation to regulate intercourse between states (Gibbons)
- Dual Federalism (1800’s – Great Depression)
* National-local distinction between federal government and states (not
used anymore)
* Strictly limited federal government to explicit powers - Federal could only regulate if:
- Regulating goods traveling in interstate market AND
- Regulations had a direct effect on interstate market
Commerce Power – Federal
Expansion after New Deal
1. Aggregate Principle for Economic Activities in State (Wickard v. Filburn)
* Can Regulate if:
1. If activity exerts substantial economic effect on interstate commerce AND
2. Total aggregate effect on interstate commerce
Obliterates direct/indirect effect for power to regulate commerce
2. Regulate People in Commerce (Heart of Atlanta Motel)
1. Test is:
1. Whether commerce concerns more than one state AND
2. Has real, substantial and harmful effect on Interstate commerce
2. Power to:
1. Regulate people moving in commerce
2. Can regulate commerce activities of people in origin and destination states
3. Aggregate principle just needs to survive rational basis (who has the burden?)
**
Executive Orders - Foundations (ebbs and power)
1. Steel Seizure Case: steel workers about to go on strike, so president seized control of the steel
mills because the produced military weapons. Determined “zones of authority” for Pres: the
power to issue an order must stem from act of Congress OR Constitution
1. Highest Ebb of authority is when President is authorized by Congress to act
1. Acts on express or implied authorization from Congress
2. Presumptively constitutional
2. Zone of Twilight: when President acts in the absence of Congressional denial of authority
(Congress hasn’t spoken or made its intent clear)
3. Lowest Ebb: is when Congress has disapproved or specifically said the President cannot
do something
1. Pres must show it’s something given to them by the Con and Congress doesn’t have
the authority to interfere
2. Presumptively unconstitutional
2. Historical gloss: systemic, unbroken practices and traditions can change the intersection
between Congressional authority and executive authority (must be Congressional
acquiescence over a long period of time)
Modern National Legislative
Power – Commerce Power
Court’s modern approach to Interstate Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to
regulate based on three categories:
- The use of channels of interstate commerce: roads, bridges, railroad tracks, air
routes, telecommunications networks, etc - The instrumentalities of persons or things in interstate commerce: planes, trains, and
automobiles - Those economic activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce:
local activity may be regulated by Congress if it exerts a substantial economic effect
on interstate commerce through its cumulate or aggregate effect OR is part of an
interstate regulatory scheme
side note There is a jx hook for govt to prove BRD that item traveled IC
Commerce Power congress can regulate: Channels of Interstate Commerce
- Channels of Interstate Commerce OR
i) Routes which person and goods move from state to state
ii) Railroad tracks, air routes, waters, comm networks, internet
iii) Regulate to keep flow free from obstacles
iv) Regulate to bar certain items traveling state to state
Commerce Power congress can regulate: Instrumentalities
- Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce OR
v) Modes or vehicles of commerce
vi)Planes, trains, ships, trucks
vii)Power to protect and regulate (even if threat arises from solely in-state activities)
Those modes and multi state business entities
People moving in IC
Goods moving in IC
Commerce Power congress can regulate: economic activities
3(a). Economic activities which have a substantial aggregate effect on interstate commerce OR
* Wickard – same person doing same economic activity
3(b). Intra-state Non-economic activity that: (Gonzales)
* Is an essential part of a larger economic activity
* Focus on the regulated activity itself, NOT circumstances surrounding
* Look for broad federal economic regulation and assess if the activity in question
relates to it
* Examples that did not Meet these criteria
* Lopez (law barring possession of a gun in school)
* Morrison (law regulating gender motivated violence)
* For both of these the activity itself was non-economic and there was no broader regulation
encompassing interstate commerce
**
Modern National Legislative
Power – Taxing Powers
Can prescribe taxes, duties, imposts, and excises for defense or
general welfare
As long as it raises revenue, it’s a tax
Generally, very broad power and only few limits
Any direct taxes on people or property apportioned among the
state’s population (direct is real property, poll tax)
Indirect taxes (all other taxes) (affecting conduct) must be uniform
No taxes on state exports
“penalty” = does not mean it is NOT a tax
Rational basis
Modern National Legislative
Power – Spending Power
Tax and Spend: Congress can attach conditions to grants of federal funds, if:
1. Spending general welfare
- Conditions are unambiguous
- Some attenuated relationship to federal program
- No independent constitutional bar
side note Congress can cross the line by imposing coercive conditions,
vague or ambiguous conditions, or conditions wholly unrelated to the federal
program or violating of another independent constitutional provision – cannot
indirectly regulate something it doesn’t have power to regulate through a penalty
disguised as a tax