Dutch Powerhouse Flashcards
Can you compare the approach that the consumer healthcare powerhouse used and the WHO approach and can you explain why the Netherlands performs so well on their example and might do so poorly on others, what do you think about the approach of the powerhouse.
The who ranked the Netherlands on the 17 place .
Different approaches can have different outcomes
Depends on the different aspects they take into account for example certain health outcomes : costs of health systems and waiting list.
This aspects have an impact on the ranking and the final measurement. Important is also the methodology and the type of data they used.
Why are some studies on the Dutch Health care contradicting
Because of the differences of framework ( which aspects of performance are measured) and the methodology ( type of data and how this data is analysed.
always take the framework and methodology into account.
What did the Dutch healthcare performance report do in their study
Combining existing research ford different branches to get an overall view of the performance of the Dutch HC.
More transparancy and more accountability ( verantwoordelijkheid)
What was the main goal and the main domain of the powerhouse
Main goal : improve health of the Dutch
Main domains : quality ,acces and costs
How was quality divided
Quality was divided in effectivness and safety and responsivness
This is because the role of the government is to safeguard quality ,acces and affordability ( costs).
What type of analysis can you do to compare
analysis over time within 1 country or compare with other countries
compare with the policy norms ( for example the time an ambulamce needs to be there).
Different levels of measurement : system ( national) and organizational ( hospital).
Acces and geography : how fast can a patient be in the hospital ( traveltime)
Timeliness : how quick beingh helped when you arrived in the hospital
How do we weight all this different components to see if a health care system is good.
Using the who approach,so you look at the ranking that comes out of the measurement.
Is a comparison between countries easy to make
difficult because they use different definitions
What can policy makers do with the report
it helps them to get an overview
it sets priority were things can be improved
we can learn from other countries
it identifies knowledge gaps
what is important when you present a report
you have to try to get a lot of attention because in the policy cycle it is not only about scientific evidence but also less rational arguments play a role.
information in the media gets more attention.
the impact of beliefs is bigger then the impact of evidence
how is the framework of the DHCPR divided
it is divided in 4 aspects : prevention, cure, end of life care and long time care
what are the conclusions of the DHCPR report
easy acces, healthcare for everyone
the costs of care are seldom a problem and everyone is close to the GP but there are LONG waiting lists and poor telephone acces to GP.
do we get value for money in the netherlands accordind dhcp
in nl we pay more but also got more volume of care the last years.the rising costs are a big problem.
In international cost benefit comparison ,Nl performs about average.
On meso level some signs of inefficiency ,for example substantial variation in GP taruffs and hospital stay.
the Netherlands has the same problems as many EU countries : rising costs,ageing,rising chronic ill etc…
what is the definition of health care systems
Healthcare is defined as activities aimed at alleviating, reducing, compensating and/or preventing deficiencies in the health status of autonomy of individuals (Van der Meer and Schouten, 1997). It is centrally concerned with the provision of care to individuals by professionals with a medical education, but also includes supportive activities conducted by assistants and management
can health outcomes be Affected by non-medical determinants
–environment, public hygiene, nutrition
–case-mix (patients characteristics such as age, comorbidities)