chapter 7 - exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

______ liability is focused on the nature of the situation instead of the actor’s actions

A

strict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

if you keep something on your land that’s likely to cause mischief, you are _____ if mischief happens

A

liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

state the kind of activity that has these three things:
1. involves a potential degree of serious harm
2. involve a high degree of risk that can’t be completely guarded against with the use of reasonable care
3. isn’t commonly performed in the community/area

A

abnormally dangerous activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

abnormally dangerous activities can be anything ____ or ____

A

explosive, toxic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the 3 other applications of strict liability?

A
  1. keeping wild animals
  2. keeping domestic animals
  3. quid pro quo sexual harassment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what kind of liability does keeping wild animals come with? what are the 3 types of animals? which breed of dogs is considered a wild animals?

A

absolute liability
lions, tigers, and bears
pitbulls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what kind of liability does keeping domestic animals come with? what does that mean?

A

qualified liability, we aren’t always liable for the actions of domestic animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

which domestic animal is most often sued over? what is a sign that they can be dangerous?

A

dogs, biting beforehand shows that they can be dangerous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is quid pro quo?

A

exchanging workplace benefits for sexual action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

_____ liability are lawsuits involving facts of a company selling/making a product that’s the cause of plaintiff’s injuries

A

product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the 3 causes of action that can be used against the maker of a product under a product liability case?

A

negligence, fraud, strict liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

t/f: the plaintiff can sure the entire chain of production in a product liability case

A

true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the following is product liability based on _______:
- if a manufacturer fails to exercise “due care” to make a product safe, a person who is injured by the product can sure the product for negligence.

A

negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

for product liability based on negligence, “due care” is required in which 6 areas?

A

design, production, processes, warning, assembling, testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

is privity of contract (relationship between product and injured) required for a product liability based on negligence case?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

in a product liability based on negligence case, what must the plaintiff must show? aside from due care duty

A

that the defendant’s conduct was the cause in fact and proximate cause of their injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

proximate caused is based on the _____ of the consequences

A

forseeability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

product liability based on ________ must require these 3:
1. misrepresentation of material fact concerning quality, nature, or approximate use of the product is made knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth
2. as a result of the fraud, injury occurs
3. the buyer/plaintiff relied on the misrepresentation.

A

misrepresentation

19
Q

intentional mislabeling of products or concealment of product defects is an example of _______

A

misrepresentation

20
Q

Strict Product Liability (aka Defective product case) based on ______ _____ require the following:
1. product was in a defective state
2. defendant was normally engaged in the selling/distributing of the product
3. product was unreasonably dangerous to the consumer because of the defective condition
4. plaintiff incurred physical harm to self/property by the consumption
5. defective condition was the proximate cause of injury
6. goods weren’t substantially changed

A

strict liability

21
Q

what must you prove to show that a product was in a defective condition? ( 3 different ones, needs to prove at least one)

A

manufacturing, design, or warning defects

22
Q

sellers are only liable for products that are ______ ______

A

unreasonably dangerous

23
Q

what are the 2 things that make a product unreasonably dangerous? ( you have to prove both in Texas)

A
  1. product was dangerous beyond the expectation of the customer
  2. the manufacturer could have made a safer alternative design but didn’t produce it
24
Q

what are the 3 types of product defects?

A

manufacturing, design, warning

25
Q

name the type of defect:
- a product departs from its intended design even though all possible care was exercised in the preparation and marketing of the product

A

manufacturing defect

26
Q

name the type of defect:
- the foreseeable risk of harm posed by the product could have been reduced or avoided by the adoption of a safer alternative design

A

design defect

27
Q

what are the 2 tests for a design defect?

A
  1. there’s a safer alternative design (SAD)
  2. the design of the product is unreasonable dangerous due to the adoption of the design
28
Q

what is used to determine if the risk of harm outweighs its utility to user and the public?

A

risk utility analysis

29
Q

name the type of defect:
- the foreseeable risk of harm posed by the product could have been reduced or avoided by reasonable instructions or warning

A

warning defects

30
Q

t/f: pharmaceuticals have to show all possible side effects to avoid a warning defect law suit

A

true

31
Q

obvious risks and foreseeable misuses fall under ______ defects

A

warning

32
Q

t/f: a manufacturer has a duty to warn about risks that are obvious or commonly know
ex) a knife will cut you

A

false

33
Q

t/f: the seller must warn about foreseeable misuses

ex) trampoline warning or don’t use dryer in water

A

true

34
Q

name the following type of liability”
- if a plaintiff can’t prove which manufacturer produced the particular product that caused harm, then all manufacturers are liable in proportion to their share of the market

A

market share liability

35
Q

what are the 7 defenses to Product Liability?

A
  1. assumption of the risk
  2. product misuse
  3. comparative negligence
  4. commonly known dangers
  5. knowledgeable user
  6. Statutes of Limitation
  7. Statutes of Repose
36
Q

what do you have to prove when using the assumption of the risk defense? (2)

A

the plaintiff knew the risk created by the product and voluntarily assumed the risk by using it

37
Q

to argue product misuse, you have to prove that the product was…

A

used in a way not intended by the manufacturer

ex) using drugs illegally and seeing injuries

38
Q

courts have limited the product misuses defense to when the particular use (is/is not) forseeable.

A

is not

39
Q

t/f: if the use of a product is reasonably foreseeable, the manufacturer must warn.

A

true

40
Q

the comparative negligence defense states that… and it’s used to…

A

the plaintiff is partially responsible and it’s used to reduce money owed by company

41
Q

the ________ _______ defense to Product Liability is used when you have a particular danger known to a particular person.

ex) electricians know about electricity, so they don’t need to be warned about electrical shocks

A

knowledgeable user

42
Q

under statutes of _____, the injured must bring a product liability claim within 2-4 years from the date of discovery or when it happened

A

limitation

43
Q
A