Chapter 3 Flashcards
Describe what Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is
A process for resolving disputes as an alternative to the courts
What are the three types of ADR?
(1) Negotiation - parties or their lawyers engage directly to find a solution. (2) Mediation - neural third party facilitates discussions. (3) Arbitration - neutral third party makes a binding decision after hearing evidence—cannot be appealed except under severe procedural errors.
What are the advantages of using ADR?
Cost efficient, time saving, promotes privacy, higher compliance rate, maintains relationships.
When should you not use ADR?
Legal precedent is required, there’s a power imbalance between parties, parties unwilling to negotiate or disclose key information.
Describe the provincial court hierarchy
(Lower level) - provincial court. (Senior level) - Supreme Court or Court of Queen’s Bench. (Appellate level) - Provincial appellate courts. Supreme Court of Canada.
What are some specialized courts?
Domestic Violence Court. Drug Treatment Court. Mental Health Court.
What are the Federal courts?
Federal court, Federal Court of Appeal, Tax Court of Canada.
What are the steps for civil litigation?
(1) issuing of a writ of summons (2) appearance (3) statement of claim (4) statement of defence (5) counterclaim and defence to counterclaim (6) discovery (7) trial proceedings (8) judgement and enforcement
What is the limitation for pursuing civil litigation?
Must be within 2 years of the event or discovery of damage.
What are the three government branches?
Executive, legislative and judicial.
What are some disadvantages of using ADR?
Judicial fairness and impartiality are not guaranteed, courts have more power to extract info, decisions don’t follow precedent, resolutions may not be enforceable.
What are the rules of Natural Justice?
(1) Fair hearing - complaint at must have notice and opportunity to be heard. (2) Decision must be made by persons hearing the evidence. (3) Impartiality - no bias or appearance of bias in decision makers.
Describe Judicial reviewing of Administrative Decisions
(1) must adhere to natural rules of justice. (2) review of the process by which the decision was made not on the decision itself. (3) courts use prerogative writs for judicial review.
What must be present for a Judicial review of an Administrative decision?
Invalid statute, decision or remedy goes beyond power set out in legislation, errors of law on the record, failure to follow procedural fairness, abuse of power.
What is Prerogative Writs?
When a public official or tribunal has breached their duty
What is Certiorari?
Nullifies a tribunals decision
What is Prohibition?
Prohibits a tribunal from proceeding
What is Mandamus?
An order compelling a government to perform it’s duties