Chapter 22 - Cross-Examining the Character Witness Flashcards
A party who wishes to challenge a fact witness’s character for truthfulness may do so in what 3 ways?
- Cross-examine the witness about specific incidents suggesting a character for untruthfulness under RULE 608(b)(1)
- Offer evidence of the witness’s criminal convictions under RULE 609
- Present a character witness who offers reputation or opinion testimony about the fact witness’s character for untruthfulness under RULE 608(a)
Fact witness has been attacked. What are the 2 types of evidence that a party may introduce to show the witness’s truthful character?
- Explanation of any extenuating circumstances related to prior convictions –> the party usually elicits these details from the fact witness on redirect examination
- Introduction of reputation or opinion evidence suggesting a character for truthfulness. –> the party offers this testimony through a rebuttal character witness.
608(b)(2)
Allows parties to ask character witnesses on CROSS-EXAMINATION about specific incidents of a fact witness’s behavior.
608(b)(2)’s two limitations
- Must have a good faith basis
2. Cannot offer extrinsic evidence of the specific act
Cross-Examination of a character witness can be much more devastating when the wtiness testifies about the fact witness’s ______ nature.
Truthful
2 Limitations on cross-examining a character witness about a fact witness’s TRUTHFUL nature?
- Good faith supporting belief
- Trial Judge has discretion to exclude questions when they will create unfair prejudice substantially outweighing their probative value.
Judges are much more likely to allow cross-examination of _______ than _________.
character witnesses than fact witnesses.
Because of the damaging questions that can be asked on cross-examination, parties are much likely to present character witness who testify about ______ than they are to offer witnesses who testify about ______.
Truthfulness / Untruthfulness –> Everyone has a specific instance of lying that could be found out on cross –> only negative character witnesses
Why is cross-examination of character witnesses about specific incidents usually a win-win tactic for the cross-examiner?
- CW either admits the existence of behavior undercutting his opinion OR
- CW makes a denial that suggests he is uninformed about FW’s rep or opinion.