Chapter 2 (EXAM 1) Flashcards
Ethics, Ways of Collecting Data, Designing Experiments, Correlation & Causation
Human Participants
Federally funded research must be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) in order to continue with research
IRB requirements
-Benefits of research outweighs the harm
-Requires informed consent
-voluntary participation
-right to privacy
-reveal deceptions
-debrief
Informed Consent
Research explained in detail so participants can make informed decisions about their participation
Voluntary Participation
Participants can always quit midway, no coercion or pressure to continue
Right to Privacy
Participant’s data and personal information cannot be shared or published without consent. Must be confidential and anonymous (does not collect identifying info to begin with)
Deception
Purposely misleading participants in order to maintain the integrity of the research
can be used but must have good reason and reveal deception at the end
Tuskegee soldiers and syphillis a case of deception used immorally
Debriefing
Chance for participants to ask questions and be given more details about the study towards the end. Any deception used must be explained here as well
Animal Subjects
5-8% of research
uses rodents/birds
acceptable substitute of unethical practices on humans (such as medication)
must have good reason and benefit must outweigh the harm
Requirements for Animal Subjects
Justify any harm to animals
Animals must be treated in very good living conditions
Case study (self report)
In-depth investigation of a certain individual.
usually the first step to learn about something
rare
Fencing
Survey (self-report)
Questionnaire to gather information from a large group of people very quickly
fast cheap and efficient
can find out about things that cannot be directly observed
not always accurate (Social desirability bias)
Naturalistic Observation (Observation)
Observing people in their most natural environment without telling them that they are being watched
Behavior no longer natural when they know that they are being watched
No conclusion about causation can be drawn (only the outcome)
Archival Research (observation)
Using existing data to answer questions. Doesn’t collect new data directly from participants
no control over the data, also shows no causation
may not be the right question and data may also be incomplete
angry tweet and heart disease example
Cross-sectional study (How people change over time)
Groups of different aged people are researched at once and then compared to other groups
easier, and faster data
Problem: Cohort/generational effect
causes may not be due to aging itself, but due to generational differences
i.e. technology and hostility with age may not have to do with the process of aging itself, but generational differences
Longitudinal (How people change over time)
One group of same aged people are watched over time then compared to their earlier selves
better show of change over time
Problem: extremely time consuming and expensive. A rare method, and usually studied over shorter periods of time.
Designing Experiment steps
- Predict
- Choose Research Method
- Collecting Data
- Interpreting Data
- Publishing Data
Predicting
Formulate a hypothesis
Define operational definitions
Hypothesis
Tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables, usually a guess
Theory
System of interrelated ideas sued to explain observations
Variables
Any measurable events that are either controlled or observed