behaviourist approaches to learning Flashcards
principle 3.1
learning is what happens when we are wrong
principle 3.2
everything gets boring eventually
Pavlov and his dogs
- led to the principle of contiguity
during training every time the dog gets food there is a whistle - results in conditioned stimulus - dogs’ mouths watering at the sound of the whistle
classical conditioning
- we naturally respond to things in certain ways
- by pairing new cues with that natural stimulus we respond to the new cue in the same way
- Learning is defined as the change in strength of a behaviour in response to a previously neutral cue
- change in behaviour indicates a change in association
- leads us to respond to cues, like habits automatically
- partly responsible for tolerance to substances - environment triggers not personal attributes
- is also responsible for emotional responses as well. we have a habit of how we respond to social situations
acquisition the learning curve
the first step of classical conditioning
def: learning to associate a conditioned stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus so that when the conditioned stimulus is presented on its own, it elicits the same response as the unconditioned stimulus
acquisition timing of cues
- delayed conditioning - food right after
- trace conditioning - pause before food
- simultaneous conditioning - cue and food at the same time
- backwards conditioning - food and then queue
extinction def
weakening of an association between two stimuli over time - unlearning
eg: whistle no food to make there be no salivation
reverting it to a neutral stimulus instead of conditioned
the Rescorla Wagner model 2 assumptions
- learning occurs when what happens does not match our predictions
- our predictions are based on previous experience
the Rescorla Wagner model def:
“Whenever there are two stimuli (or more) paired together, any change in the strength of the association between two stimuli will be proportional to the difference between what was expected and what happened and how noticeable the association is.”
the Rescorla Wagner model formula
At=S(W-At)
At = change in strength/ association on current trial for stimuli
S = Salience (Range 0-1) how noticeable 1= instant learning
W = maximum strength of the association
At = current strength of all associations - how much learning has occurred so far
Last half is prediction error
Learning with the Rescorla Wagner model
light with food
W= 100 - the amount of reward being paired with the light
no learning yet so dog does not associate light with food therefore
A1= 0
Not obvious that light is associated with for so
S= 0.2
A1=0.2 (100-0)
A1=20
aka there is an increase in the strength of association therefore even if light were only presented dog would expect 20 units of food to be deliver
- not 20
the Rescorla Wagner model trial 2
a2= 0.2 (100-20)
a2= 16
less than before but we continue to learn
trail three Wagner
On trial 2 we add A2 + A2 aka 20 + 16 therefore
A3 = 0.2 (100-36)
leading to a smaller change in the strength of association
A3 = 12.8 =0.2(64)
does the rate of learning slow down after each trial
yes, but from 10 trials u can go for 0% association to 99% association
key notes
by trial 10 the change per trial is very small
the current strength of the association gets closer and closer to the W