behaviourist approaches to learning Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

principle 3.1

A

learning is what happens when we are wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

principle 3.2

A

everything gets boring eventually

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pavlov and his dogs

A
  • led to the principle of contiguity
    during training every time the dog gets food there is a whistle
  • results in conditioned stimulus - dogs’ mouths watering at the sound of the whistle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

classical conditioning

A
  1. we naturally respond to things in certain ways
  2. by pairing new cues with that natural stimulus we respond to the new cue in the same way
  3. Learning is defined as the change in strength of a behaviour in response to a previously neutral cue
  4. change in behaviour indicates a change in association
  5. leads us to respond to cues, like habits automatically
  6. partly responsible for tolerance to substances - environment triggers not personal attributes
  7. is also responsible for emotional responses as well. we have a habit of how we respond to social situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

acquisition the learning curve

A

the first step of classical conditioning
def: learning to associate a conditioned stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus so that when the conditioned stimulus is presented on its own, it elicits the same response as the unconditioned stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

acquisition timing of cues

A
  • delayed conditioning - food right after
  • trace conditioning - pause before food
  • simultaneous conditioning - cue and food at the same time
  • backwards conditioning - food and then queue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

extinction def

A

weakening of an association between two stimuli over time - unlearning
eg: whistle no food to make there be no salivation
reverting it to a neutral stimulus instead of conditioned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the Rescorla Wagner model 2 assumptions

A
  1. learning occurs when what happens does not match our predictions
  2. our predictions are based on previous experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the Rescorla Wagner model def:

A

“Whenever there are two stimuli (or more) paired together, any change in the strength of the association between two stimuli will be proportional to the difference between what was expected and what happened and how noticeable the association is.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the Rescorla Wagner model formula

A

At=S(W-At)
At = change in strength/ association on current trial for stimuli
S = Salience (Range 0-1) how noticeable 1= instant learning
W = maximum strength of the association
At = current strength of all associations - how much learning has occurred so far
Last half is prediction error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Learning with the Rescorla Wagner model

A

light with food
W= 100 - the amount of reward being paired with the light
no learning yet so dog does not associate light with food therefore
A1= 0
Not obvious that light is associated with for so
S= 0.2
A1=0.2 (100-0)
A1=20
aka there is an increase in the strength of association therefore even if light were only presented dog would expect 20 units of food to be deliver
- not 20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the Rescorla Wagner model trial 2

A

a2= 0.2 (100-20)
a2= 16
less than before but we continue to learn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

trail three Wagner

A

On trial 2 we add A2 + A2 aka 20 + 16 therefore
A3 = 0.2 (100-36)
leading to a smaller change in the strength of association
A3 = 12.8 =0.2(64)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

does the rate of learning slow down after each trial

A

yes, but from 10 trials u can go for 0% association to 99% association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

key notes

A

by trial 10 the change per trial is very small
the current strength of the association gets closer and closer to the W

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

On a common saying….

A

“that’s got a steep learning curve”
RW model shows us that it is not always that something is difficult

17
Q

how are the trials represented in a graph

A

by a curve that starts at 0 and then increases and increases and eventually starts to plate

18
Q

extinction with RW

A

light with no food
A1= 100
w=0 - no food
Is it immediately obvious that there is no food coming? no
S=0.2
a1=0.2(0-100)
a1= -20
same as the first one but negative
Trial 2
A2 = 0.2 (0-80)
a2= -16
continues…….
graph goes downwards

19
Q

blocking

A

Acquisition phase continues
what happens when we add a light
RW for stimulus 2
a2t = s(100-95)
the acquisition has already occurred so the prediction error is low
so how much learning is possible
5 - split by the two stimuli

20
Q

graphs of blocking

A

two lines, one at the top and one at the bottom
a1 is normal and the a2 comes later but doesn’t rise

21
Q

acquisition prior to over-expectation

A

the dog learns light and whistles both mean foods
because the dog learned that the light and whistle mean food separately there is no blocking
light = 100 units of food
whistle = 100 units of food
graphs are normal and similar

22
Q

when does over expectation occur

A

ex: dog thinks when it’s presented with both the whistle and the light that it will get double the food
the chart starts high and goes lower because the dog is disappointed
(disappointment curve)

23
Q

overshadowing

A

what if two stimuli are learned together… but one is much more noticeable than the other?
salience (how noticeable) influences how quickly learning will occur

24
Q

overshadowing dog

A

giant light
chart = the stimulus with higher salience goes high = more learning (shoots up more quickly)

25
Q

spontaneous recovery

A

rw predicts that if response to CS undergoes extinction, it must be relearned from scratch for there to be any response to it again
small response after relearning something

26
Q

rapid reacquisition

A

rw predicts learning should take place at the same rate as before, but this is not the case
learning is faster the second time

27
Q

latent inhibition

A

once u pair stimulus with a reward, should begin at the rate determined by the salience of the associated in that first trial
seeing a stimulus do nothing before makes it harder to associate it with a reward
- decreases salience

28
Q

limitations of RW

A

fails to predict some things
like all models, it is wrong in some ways and taken over by more complex models

29
Q

the point of rw

A

show how learning depends on errors
demonstrates some common learning phenomena to be aware of
show how learning happens quickly at first but slows over time

30
Q

habituation

A

occurs when the response to a stimulus decreases over time
after a long time, habituation occurs
- faster on round 2
- higher intensity stimuli lead to higher intensity responses and slower habituation
-overlearning can occur. continued exposure after habituation can have a long term effect

31
Q

the good side of habituation

A
  1. distractions - things that distract us in the environment can often be tuned out with repeated exposure to them
  2. overcoming fears : By exposing yourself to things that cause anxiety, you can slowly reduce your anxious response to those things and be more in control around them
32
Q

graded exposure

A

take a fear, then expose urself to that fear until slowly over time your less scared

33
Q

the dark side of habituation

A

too much of a good thing - get less excited about it over time eg: substances
compassion fatigue: being exposed to sad stories leading us to be less likely to help
learned helplessness: overexposure to stressful environments may make us less willing to escape the environment

34
Q

factors that impact habituation

A

novelty : if the duration or intensity of stimulus changes your response will reset partly
duration : if the duration is too short, habituation to future exposures will be slower
frequency : more frequent exposure leadis to quicker habituation
intensity : higher intensity = harder to tune out

35
Q

the inherent reward for learning

A

dopamine firing shifts from reward to the stimulus cue - our brains reward us for leaning
learning is dependent on prediction error
rewards lose their impact over time RW is steepest in the beginning +habituation

36
Q

stimulating a task choice

A

once you learn a hobby you become bored if it is too easy