Assault Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the definition of assault in common law?

A

Intentionally or recklessly causing the victim to apprehend immediate violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the actus reus of assault

A

actions or words that cause the victim to apprehend immediate violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What physical reactions can indicate assault?

A

Shaking, crying, running away, etc.

These reactions show the victim’s apprehension of violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Read v Coker (1853)

A

Established that apprehension of immediate and unlawful violence constitutes assault.

The case illustrates how gestures can lead to an assault charge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Ireland (1977)

A

-D. breathed silently down the phone
## Footnote

Silence can amount to assault.

This case expanded the definition of assault to include non-verbal threats.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Constanza (1997)

A

-D. graffitied a threat
## Footnote

Writing can be considered assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tuberville v Savage (1669)

A

-“if… i would”
## Footnote

Words can negate an assault.
If = NO assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Smith v C.C. of Woking (1983)

A

-D. stared into ground floor house
## Footnote

The threat must be in the near future to constitute assault.

The case emphasized that the victim’s apprehension of violence is crucial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Logdon v DPP (1976)

A

-V. has fake gun pulled

Apprehension of a threat matters more than whether the threat can actually happen.

The victim’s perception of danger is key.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly