Administrative/Filing Flashcards

1
Q

Title VII requirement for filing a suit

A

180 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

EEOC, state, or local jurisdiction filing for a suit

A

300 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How cases are triaged

A

“A” claims are extremely strong and will be thoroughly investigated.
“B” claims will require additional information to determine their validity.
“C” charges typically have little merit or fail on the face of the claim itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Two findings by EEOC

A

That there is cause to believe discrimination has occurred, OR
Based on the record before the EEOC there is no reasonable cause to find discrimination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Conciliation?

A

Where EEOC settles a discrimination charge before it reaches the federal court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mach Mining

A

The court held that it is appropriate for the lower courts to examine whether the EEOC satisfied its statutory obligation to attempt conciliation before filing suit.
Helps recognize the EEOC’s extensive discretion to determine the kind and amount of communication with an employer appropriate in any given case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

National Railroad Passenger Corp.

A

Issue: Is a hostile-environment claim actionable if one act that is part of the hostile work environment occurred within the statutorily mandated period for filing a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission?

Holding: Discrete acts of employment discrimination should be filed in compliance with the statutory requirement and acts that occurred outside of it are not actionable. Hostile work environments require that an action should occur within the statutorily mandated time period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates

A

Issue: May shareholders of an organization who lack control over key aspects of the work performed qualify as employees for purposes of federal employment laws?

Rule: Control is the principal factor to be followed in whether the director-shareholder physicians should be counted as employees.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission likewise focuses on control over work. EEOC guidelines use a six-factor test:
whether the organization can hire and fire and set rules controlling someone’s work;
the extent the organization supervises the person’s work;
whether the person reports to a superior;
how much the person can influence the organization;
the parties’ intent as shown in contracts; and
whether the person shares in the organization’s profits, losses, and liabilities.

Holding: Shareholder-directors of an organization who lack control over key aspects of the work performed may qualify as employees for purposes of federal employment laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mariotti v. Mariotti Building Products Inc.

A

Issue: Is a person an employee under Title VII only if various factors indicate that the employer has control over that person?

Rule: Control is the principal factor to be followed in whether the director-shareholder physicians should be counted as employees.

Holding: A person is an employee under Title VII only if various factors indicate that the employer has control over that person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Coverage under Title VII or ADA

A

To be covered by Title VII and the ADA the employer must have 15 or more employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Coverage under ADEA

A

To be covered by the ADEA, the employer must have 20 or more employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who is an employee?

A

“employee” means an individual covered by an employer”
Factors considered
- Can organization hire/fire individual?
- Extent that organization supervises the individual’s work?
- Extent individual can influence the organization?
- Did parties intend individuals to be an employee?
- Does individual share in profits, losses, and liabilities of organization?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Employer-Employee Relationship Factors

A
  • Employer has right to control when, where, and how worker performs job
  • Work does not require high level of skill/expertise
  • Employer furnishes tools, material, and equipment
  • Work performed on employer’s premises
  • Continuing relationship between worker/employer
  • Employer has right to assign additional projects
  • Employer sets hours an duration of job
  • Worker is paid by hour, week, or month
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Employee vs. Independent Contractor

A
  • Employer must consider whether to employ full-time workers or independent contractors.
  • Benefit of full-time workers
    –More loyalty to company
    –Greater quality and quantity of work
    Benefits of Independent Contractors
  • Allows employers to handle variation in workloads or economic conditions
  • Employers can avoid giving benefits and
  • Not covered by anti-discrimination laws.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Plaintiff must sufficiently allege she has been discriminated against under federal law:

A
  • Must be plausible claim to relief;
    “A short and plain statement of the claim showing the pleader is entitled to relief”
  • Consider the pros and cons including too much or too little information in the complaint.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Swierkiewicz

A

Rule: SCOTUS held that an employment discrimination complaint need not include specific facts establishing a prima facie case under the framework of McDonnell Douglas.
-It must only contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” pursuant to FRCP Rule 8(a)(2).

17
Q

EEOC v. Houston Funding -> Surviving Summary Judgment

A

Because discriminating against a woman who is lactating violates Title VII and the PDA, the Court held that the EEOC has stated a prima facie case of sex discrimination by showing that Houston Funding fired Venters because she was lactating and wanted to express milk at work.

18
Q

Mary v. Chrysler Group LLC -> Jury Trials

A

Seventh Circuit held that the record contained sufficient evidence to show that Chrysler failed to take reasonable steps to protect May from harassment because May had produced evidence of dozens of incidents of harassment in a three-year period, despite the fact that Chrysler conducted two meetings and hired handwriting experts in an unsuccessful effort to monitor and to identify culprits during the first year of harassment.

19
Q

Administrative Walkthrough

A
  • Discrimination by private actor
  • Files with EEOC within 300 day
  • They will find cause or no cause
  • Right to sue letter will be issued
  • 90 days to file complaint
  • Has to state plausible claims in complaint
  • — Plead prima facie case just to be safe
  • Plead prima facie case, will likely survive motion to dismiss and go into discovery
  • – Lots of things happen in discovery
  • Employer will move for summary judgment
  • – If it’s denied we move to jury
  • Jury Trial!
20
Q

Arbitration

A

A neutral maker is selected and empowered to make a final and binding decision in the matter.

21
Q

Hooters of America v. Phillips

A

Issue: Can an arbitration agreement that is very unfair toward one party be enforced?
Rule: An arbitration agreement may be rescinded if one party to the agreement has promulgated entirely one-sided arbitration rules and procedures.
Holding: Court held that Hooters materially breached the arbitration agreement by promulgating rules so egregiously unfair as to constitute a complete default of it’s contractual obligation to draft arbitration rules and to do so in good faith.

22
Q

Mediation

A
  • Mediation involves an attempt to settle the dispute informally between the parties.
  • A mediator does not have the authority to issue a binding decision. Further, the mediator’s role is to attempt to resolve the matter informally between the parties.