6th Amendment Right to Counsel Flashcards
6th Amendment Right to Counsel - General
Once 6th Amend. right to counsel attaches, police may not elicit incriminating statements outside the presence of D’s counsel
6th Amendment Right to Counsel - Application
Right attaches once charges have been filed
Applies to all subsequent stages of judicial proceedings
6th Amendment Right to Counsel - Scope
Right is offense-specific; police can question D about any other crime without violating D’s 6th Amend. rights
6th Amendment Right to Counsel - 5th v 6th
5th
- Not automatic: accused must invoke right unambiguously requesting
- No offense specific: Once invoked, police most stop questioning on all subjects
6th
- Automatic: attaches once charges have been filed and at all subsequent stages
-Offense specific: Police can question D about any other crimes
6th Amendment Right to Counsel - Right to Effective Counsel
Included in 6th Amend right to counsel
- To establish ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal, D must show there is a reasonable probability that his trial’s outcome would have been different absent counsel’s deficient performance
Pretrial Lineups & Showups - Right to Counsel
A suspect has a right to counsel at any post-charge, in-person lineup or showup
- Does not apply to non-live identification procedures (e.g. photographic lineups, fingerprinting)
Lineup: W is shown several possible suspects
Showup: W is asked to ID a single suspect
6th Amendment Right to Counsel - Due Process Considerations (2)
D can attack pretrial ID procedures as a denial of due process rights if:
1) ID is unnecessarily suggestive; and
2) There is a substantial likelihood of misidentification
- Determined under the totality of circumstances
- Tough standard; must be extremely suggestive (e.g. perpetrator believe to be male and suspect is the only male in lineup)
6th Amendment Right to Counsel - Remedy for Violation
D may move to supress any subsequent in-trial ID made by the witness
Note: remedy for a violation is rare because govt. can often prove the ID’ing W has an independent source of ID to overcome exclusionary rule