2H Principles and practice of health promotion Flashcards
2 different view points on the extent to which health is individual or collective responsibility
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/
COLLECTIVISM
-doctrine that holds that and entity (be it state, government, organization or individual) has a responsibility to society as a whole
INDIVIDUALISM/ LIBETARIANISM
- a moral, social and political philosophy which emphasises the importance of the individual
- central tenants around individual liberty, personal independence and the virtue of self reliance
In general it falls to politicians to decide which paradigm dominates in health policy ie in the US the lack of universal healthcare reflects the political belief that an individual, not society, is responsible for healthcare
Give 4 examples of healthcare policies emphasising collective (social) responsibility
LEGISLATION
- ie drink driving laws which protect both individuals and others who the individual might out at risk
REGULATION
- ie health and safety regulations enable the health and safety executive to inspect business and ensure they a re protecting employees
POPULATION WIDE MEASURES
- ie water fluoridation
PROGRESSIVE HEALTHCARE SERVICE FUNDING SYSTEM
- universal tax where the greatest amount is paid by the richest, even thought the poorest often have most intense health service use
Give 3 examples of healthcare policies emphasising individual responsibility
INFORMATION PROVISION
- ie providing information on safe alcohol consumption levels allows people to choose how much to drink give the health risks
DEREGULATION
- ie relaxing licensing laws allowing pubs to serve alcohol 24 hours a day would allow people to choose when and where to drink alcohol
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE
- enables people to choose when and where to access healthcare
What are the determinants of health?
Factors with the greatest influence on health
Most of these positive determinants lie outside of the scope of health and social care which tend to deal with ill health
name 4 determinant of health theories/models with names and year
- the health field concept (Lalonde) 1974
- The policy rainbow (Dahlgreen and whitehead) 1991
- The health field model (Evans and stoddart) 1990
- Social determinants model (Diderichsen and Hallqvist) 1998
Describe the health field concept
- Lalonde 1974
- Canadian health minister
- explained that other factors alongside healthcare services have a major influence on health
- described 4 areas with key health influence:
1. Human Biology
2. Environment
3. Healthcare services
4. Lifestyle - criticised for having too much emphasis on lifestyle and not enough on the environment
Describe the policy rainbow
- Dahlgreen and whitehead 1991
- Acknowledges there are individual characteristics that cannot be changed (age, gender) and those which can be influenced (individual lifestyle factors)
- model indicated the different levels at which health might be influenced
- makes no attempt to explain the relationship between layers or elements within a layer
- aims to stimulate discussion about the relative importance of each layer/ element and the potential for intervention
- ## the relative importance of each layer and element will vary from population to population
The health field model
- Evans and Stoddart
- 1990
- health is explicitly conceptualised as not only the absence of disease but includes functional status and wellbeing
- helps practitioners understand how the determinants themselves are influenced and therefore how they might be modified
Factors include:
1. Social environment: education, employment family, poverty
2. Physical environment: poor housing, proximity to waste/hazards/conflict
3. Genetics: genetic factors which interact with the environment
4. Behaviour: Viewed as an ‘intermediate’ determinant (ie not simply a voluntary act’), behaviour is shaped by a range of determinants ie education, finance
Social Determinants model
- Diderichsen and Hallqvist
- 1998
- Social conditions affect individuals social situations which then determine their health risks
- this model identifies 4 broad conceptual mechanisms:
1. SOCIAL STRATIFICATION (social conditions such as education and employment will determine peoples social situations)…leading to…
2 DIFFERENTIAL EXPOSURE ..and..
3 DIFFERENTIAL VULNERABILITY….which together results in….
4 DIFFERENT CONSEQUENCES - the mechanisms work synergistically to create health inequalities
- for each mechanism, the possible entry points for policy can be identified on the model
Define social inequalities
Systematic differences on health between socioeconomic groups which are socially produced, modifiable and unfair
ie marmot reports 2010 and 2020
consider 3 different possible aims of health promotion
- to improve health?
- to improve access to healthcare?
- to enable individuals to improve their own health?
consider some areas health promotion can reach into (3)
- policy
- community improvement
- individual choice
The Ottawa Charter general
- est in 1986
- Participants met to share their knowledge of health promotion and came up with the Ottawa Charter to support the WHO in ‘health for all’
- the charter implicitly assumes that there are some circumstances beyond individual control and these require community involvement or state intervention
Individual vs community: list 5 things that the Ottawa Charter advocates that people in health promotion should do
- create supportive ENVIRONMENTS
- enable COMMUNITY participation
- develop SKILLS for health
- Reorientate health services towards PREVENTION
- build PUBLIC POLICIES that promote health
Individuals vs community: Healthy lives healthy people
- 2010 public health white paper
- In contrast to the Ottawa charter promoting health promotion at community and policy levels this promotes health promotion using ‘nudge’ techniques in order to maximise individual choice
targeted Vs universal health promotion: Pros for targeted interventions
- can tailor message to the group
- can be efficient
- can target high risk groups to try and reduce health inequalities (universal messages often mostly improve the health of those with the most resources and most able to do so)
Targeted Vs universal health promotion: Disadvantages for targeted interventions
Targeting a group:
- assumes members of the group are homogeneous
- can lead to culture blaming (ie blaming men who have sex with men for AIDS epidemic)
targeting a condition:
- tagertting just those at high risk can miss the majority of people who will get the disease
- prevention paradox
- esp for common conditions targeting the whole population can make a big difference to population disease risk.
- however the individual change is very small
- universal targeting can ‘pathologises’ a large number of people who would never have got sick
What are the two competing hypotheses for and against universal health promotion?
- Rose Hypothesis
- Prevention Paradox
What is the rose hypothesis
- given that risk factors for most diseases are normally distributed in the population, most cases of the disease will occur in those who are at low or medium risk of the disease. A smaller total number of cases will happen in those at high risk.
Therefore, measures to reduce the whole populations risk a little will have the greatest overall impact on disease prevalence/ incidence
Prevention Paradox
- universal interventions will have greater impact on the overall disease than targeted interventions, however, the benefit to each individual who changes their behaviour is small/ not existent
ie seatbelt wearing is an important safety measure, however, everyone has to wear them and only the few people involved in an RTC will benefit
How does the prevention paradox impact health promotion
- the prevention paradox can put the credibility of universal health promotion programmes in jeopardy
ie if a programme aims to reduce fat intake to recued CHD and many people are known to eat high fat diets but not have CHD this might reduce the incentive to follow the advice and may make people distrust/ ignore it
Communication in health education: describe McGuires model
McGuire proposed 5 communication inputs for health messages aimed at changing behaviour
- SOURCE
-The person/ organization that generates the message. Source credibility depends on position in society, source training and education, source shared characteristics with the receiver (ie age, gender, ethnicity), any source conflict of interests.
-ie health message from GP may be percieved as more credible than that from health minister - MESSAGE
- what is said and how it is said
- can be verbal or non-verbal
- can be horizontal (general health messaging ie eat a healthy diet) or vertical (specific health messaging ie stop binge drinking) - CHANNEL
- the media or medium through which the message is conveyed
- can be one to one (ie midwife–> patient), small group (ie antenatal class), mass media - RECIEVER
- the person receiving the communication
- should be the prime consideration of any health message - DESTINATION
-what is the communication trying to achieve:
- change in attitude?
-change in beliefs?
- change in behaviour?
what is integrated marketing communication?
process of delivering a unified message across multiple different media